Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bovada has been great to me in the past. Used them as a book and for poker. They closed my account in April 2012 because I live in WA state. They reopened to me this year though I haven't re deposited since. When I was using them, I was getting cash outs via Western Union in about 2 hours of request. I will use them again after cashing out from Bet Online, which I haven't done yet
|
discgolfer78 | 5 |
|
|
The Jets are not going to win in Seattle. I don't really like any of the dogs this week, but the one that I'll guarantee to be wrong is NYJ. Their offense is terrible, traveling coast-to-coast into a brutal Seattle stadium. Russell Wilson's passer rating at home is #1 in the NFL, not to mention the Jets are terrible against the run. Lynch will have a field day. Seattle will cover.
|
Tomspeople | 20 |
|
|
Love all these picks. BOL
|
Splooge | 6 |
|
|
Watching the Indiana game... this parlay is dead before it got off the ground.
|
c027 | 26 |
|
|
Don't be scared of the spread... Patriots -11.5
|
2001bmw | 28 |
|
|
Ravens moneyline may be obvious but to beat the spread is less so. If you're betting against the spread in all your picks I'd have played New England -11.5 instead of Baltimore -7.5. I did pick Baltimore to cover, but in the context of obvious plays, I think Baltimore is riskier than New England this week.
|
TwinTebow | 13 |
|
|
I'm gonna call you Mike Vick cause you love betting on dogs.
|
LeagueCapper | 146 |
|
|
Correction: I saw all the news yesterday & today on ESPN, etc. and overlooked the fact that the injuries were sustained back in week 4. Detroit is disputing the accuracy of the reports, anyway. I wouldn't worry too much about Megatron
|
roare12 | 6 |
|
|
I stayed clear of this game. Don't have anything on AP, but Megatron may be a concern.
"Lions WR Calvin Johnson told reporters Thursday that he suffered both a concussion and nerve damage during Detroit's Week 4 loss to the Vikings that has affected his ability to grip a football." https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/nfl-rapidreports/20905385/lions-clarification-of-calvin-johnsons-injury-claim-raises-more-questions
|
roare12 | 6 |
|
|
My only concern is the over for SF/STL. I feel it will be under.
I would have taken NE against the spread rather than ML. Buffalo defense is horrendous and New England turned them to swiss cheese in week 4 on the road. Now New England is playing the same matchup at home, coming off a bye. Covering 11.5 won't be a problem. BOL
|
MWdePro | 20 |
|
|
I like all the favorites to win but my only spread concern is San Francisco. Meanwhile, the Raiders are without McFadden and Goodson. Carson Palmer has been heating up lately, but the Ravens are also perfect at home. The Ravens are going to win, and I think Ray Rice will be in for a huge game after seeing what Doug Martin did to Oakland last week. Tennessee should have Jake Locker behind center- but keep in mind that CJ2K was playing terrible behind Locker & heated up with Hasselbeck in the mix. I think Ryan Tannehill has been heating up, and with the homefield adavantage and a terrible Tennessee secondary, Miami gets the nod. Will they cover by 6? Shaky. But I took them against the spread. New England's going to cut the Buffalo defense apart, much like their matchup earlier in the season. Coming off a bye, I'm confident they'll cover the spread (and then some). The 49ers and Rams may help Vegas out. Both teams are coming off a bye, and Danny Amendola should return... I think the Niners will definitely pull a victory at home but the 11.5 spread is scary. I think they'll need a defensive touchdown for that to happen, but again I took SF to cover. Much like New England against Buffalo, I think Pittsburgh is going to dominate Kansas City. Kansas City has averaged 16.6 points/game on the season, but only 11.25 over their last four games. Now they're going on the road against the #1 ranked total defense thats allowed 18.75 points over their last 4 games. I think the Steelers win big here at home in a MNF game. PS- please do not spend your winnings on a 95 Corolla. |
nuggins | 4 |
|
|
Carolina does not have more talent than Denver, on either side of the ball. They have two wins this season, against New Orleans and Washington. Those are two of the worst defenses in the NFL. Carolina is averaging 19 points over their last 3 games while Denver is averaging 33.3 points over their last 3, two of which were road games. Denver's got this.
|
mrquija27 | 37 |
|
|
This trade is basically Randall Cobb for Julio Jones. Randall Cobb has turned it on lately with Greg Jennings out, but I don't think I'd give up Juilio Jones for him. Stevie Johnson isn't a dependable fantasy WR and his schedule for the rest of the season isn't great. In playoff weeks he's against STL, SEA & MIA. That being said, I wouldn't trade Julio Jones for Randall Cobb. Jones has more upside.
|
HookEmHorns22 | 23 |
|
|
Oh they'll cover. I would take Denver -10.
|
malkin | 26 |
|
|
Terrible trade. Never trade two mediocre WR's for one stud WR. The goal is to get as many points per roster spot as possible. Trade makes no sense. If he was offering 2 RB's and you're weak at RB, that would make sense... but this trade is terrible.
|
HookEmHorns22 | 23 |
|
|
Just found out that Owen Daniels is questionable to suit up against Chicago. Casey is a decent fill-in at TE, but I think Houston cannot win without Daniels. Arian Foster & Ben Tate will have limited production against a tough Chicago D. Provided that Tillman plays, he will limit Andre Johnson in the passing attack.
|
codezilla | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by xanthax: You like all the favorites again this week. I was a bit concerned whether Miami will cover the spread, but I ended taking them because I think they're looking to bounce back in a home game against a terrible Tennessee secondary. I was also concerned whether Baltimore will cover the spread, but they're perfect at home and also looking to make a statement win, and Oakland is going coast-to-coast without McFadden or Goodson. I didn't take any action on Detroit, but only because my book didn't offer any until this morning. I regret taking Atlanta -2.5 since my book now has them -1, but I think they'll cover either way against the worst defense in the league. Skipped Dallas-Philly altogether. Took Chicago as a pick'em before learning that Peanut Tillman may miss the game to see the birth of his child. Hopefully he plays, I lose confidence in Chicago if he doesn't. San Francisco, at home & coming off a bye, will dominate St Louis while Bradford tries to re-ignite his chemistry with Amendola. All around, I'm confident with my picks.
|
codezilla | 7 |
|
|
BOL
|
codezilla | 7 |
|
|
Hello, First time poster here. Just wanted to share who I'm picking for week 10 in the NFL. All of my wagers are parlays against the spread with an occasional over/under pick. All of my parlays are picks of 4 to 8 events. I didn't make any wagers before week 6. Since I only deposited $150.00 with my sportsbook, my units have increased every week as my bankroll has grown. YTD: 3-5 in over/under YTD: +$3,082 Here are the parlays I've wagered for week 10: $100.00 to win $8,008.97 Denver Broncos -4 New York Giants -4 New England Patriots -11 Indianapolis Colts -3 Atlanta Falcons -2½ Miami Dolphins -6 Pittsburgh Steelers -11½ $40.00 to win $420.62 Tampa Bay Buccaneers -3 Denver Broncos -4 Indianapolis Colts -3 Chicago Bears pk $40.00 to win $978.45 New England Patriots -11 Miami Dolphins -6 Baltimore Ravens -7½ San Francisco 49ers -11 Pittsburgh Steelers -11½ $40.00 to win $919.02 Indianapolis Colts -3 Denver Broncos -4 Seattle Seahawks -6½ Tampa Bay Buccaneers -3 New York Giants -4 $10.00 to win $4,966.31 Denver Broncos -4 Tampa Bay Buccaneers -3 Miami Dolphins -6 Indianapolis Colts -3 Seattle Seahawks -6½ New England Patriots -11 New York Giants -4 Baltimore Ravens -7½ San Francisco 49ers -11 Pittsburgh Steelers -11 |
codezilla | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.