Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
The other angle is team coming off a terrible beat (USC) and a team coming off an unbelievable win (AZ at Oregon).
|
cmwnow | 7 |
|
|
Someone here has to have experience with this sort of situation. I'm sure it has come up over the years. The bookie set the line thinking the the middle would be USC favored, based upon public perception or actual abilities?
|
cmwnow | 7 |
|
|
I guess the public would go by the rankings right? So the line is correct and USC is going to win?
|
cmwnow | 7 |
|
|
The rankings say AZ, the line says USC. With is correct?
|
cmwnow | 7 |
|
|
Looking at Arizona, like the line move in their favor. Ranked 10, yet USC favored. Are the rankings bullshit? Or is the line Bullshit?
|
cmwnow | 15 |
|
|
Need one play to bring it all back, but must be good.
|
cmwnow | 15 |
|
|
It was just this past Monday. The just credited the money back into my account, so now I am at square one again.
|
cmwnow | 5 |
|
|
I was finally up a small amount of money for the year. I started with $500 and finished with just over $2,000. I cashed out at Bookmaker. They sent me a money order for $2,046 drawn from a Canadian Bank.
Well, it bounced earlier this week and the bank charged me a fee. I contacted Bookmaker, but haven't even received a direct response as to what they are going to do. Everyone says they are an "A" book, but common, you can't even cover a $2,000 check. How solvent are they!!! WARNING, WARNING!!
|
cmwnow | 5 |
|
|
How low can it go?
|
cmwnow | 9 |
|
|
I am starting to see comments that Kentucky will blow out Kansas. Well, then why is the line only -6.5?
|
cmwnow | 6 |
|
|
I think this is looking good. I should have bet more.
|
cmwnow | 2 |
|
|
Tease Kentucky -3, Kansas +8 $65 to win $50???
|
cmwnow | 2 |
|
|
Great cover on Carolina!
|
pistol589 | 270 |
|
|
Pistol: On the Carolina Under, Bookmaker has Under 6 at -130 and Five Dimes has Under 5 1/2 at +105. Would it be better to pay the extra juice or just go with the 5 1/2?
|
pistol589 | 270 |
|
|
Burly: Wouldn't Toronto be Homestand A play also if it stays -120 or higher?
|
pistol589 | 270 |
|
|
I've been playing the system since it started on here with great results. Correct me if I am wrong because it is kind of tricky and I have previously relied on Pistol. I see Toronto and St. Louis being A plays on the home chase system if they close out -120 or greater. I also see Carolina being a 2.03 under play because the under lost on December 31st. I also see Detroit being a 1 over play because they have had 5 straight unders. The system is set out on page 1 if anyone wants to review and check this out.
|
pistol589 | 270 |
|
|
Wait a minute. I thought the system was for team totals rather than game totals. New Jersey only scored 2, so it was a win with less than 2.5 goals.
|
pistol589 | 270 |
|
|
On the home stand wagers, I was not aware of how the labby line works, as I have never bet that way, so I researched. Would it work this way with a 111 labby line. A bet would be to win 2 units. If lost, you would add the 2 to the end, so the B bet would be to win 3 units. If the B bet is lost, then 3 is added to the end, so you would bet to win 4 units. If the wager loses, then on the next home chase, would you start with the same 111 line? If you were to win a couple of wagers and the line is cleared, do you then increase your line to 222? It is confusing to me.
|
pistol589 | 270 |
|
|
Pistol: Great NHL system. Been following it and like it. You said you work a similar system in NBA. Can you tell us what that is?
|
pistol589 | 270 |
|
|
Looking good now. Thanks for the plays. Like the quarterback focus!
|
alecboyh | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.