Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
KP...how in the hell are you? I hope everything in your life is graet!
Any thoughts on San Jose St vs Weber St? Looking into this, thinking San Jose could pull off the upset at home, thoughts? |
KineProfessor | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by hustlehard123: Im an internet thug?? Lmao ill smack the shit outa u on the streets buddy...strong on internet and on the streets u fuckiing junky... Yeah, don't you mean strong on the playground for a 8th grader? Go spew your shit somewhere else! |
hustlehard123 | 34 |
|
|
Ash...two things:
1. NEVER HEARD OF YOU. 2. NOBODY CARES WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY. |
trustandfall | 8 |
|
|
trust...why are you trying to prove yourself to some dope who came into your thread and brings up a completely unrelated topic? It's people like ash who drive away the credible cappers because they eventually get tired of their bullshit! Ash, what do you care if he thinks Les Miles is a great coach? Isn't everyone entitled to their opinion? You have been on this site less than a month and the best you have is criticizing people's opinions on who they like as coaches, dope!
|
trustandfall | 8 |
|
|
You very well may be correct, but this line stinks to high heaven, it is screaming stay away, but I still like the under, looking at a 20-13 type of game with a lot of running plays and the clock moving constantly.
BOL! |
trustandfall | 154 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by trustandfall: Maryland+7 ½ vs Georgia Tech – Maryland ML If you follow sports or read sporting news, you have no doubt heard about Maryland losing all 4 of its quarterbacks on its depth chart to season ending injuries. You’ve probably also heard about how Maryland is starting a redshirt freshman linebacker at quarterback this week. And no doubt, you’ve probably told yourself “Man, what a great spot to bet Georgia Tech!” Now let me tell you why that is a bad, bad idea. Georgia Tech is the 4th best rushing team in the country… Pretty awesome. However, I think this is far more spectacular. Maryland is the 3rd best rushing defense in the country. Yes, you read that right. Only Alabama and Stanford are averaging less rushing yards against them per game. Oh, Maryland also gives up about 20 points a game, good for 28th best in the country. That’s all well and dandy, but if Maryland doesn’t score, Georgia Tech will win. Ah, but they will score! This freshman linebacker starting at quarterback was playing quarterback in high school just two years ago! Maryland has the 4th best receiver in the ACC (by yards per game anyhow) and this “linebacker” went 7-7 in his final game as a senior. Sure, he ran an option attack in high school, but it’s obvious he knows how to throw the ball too. This is going to be a very, very low scoring game as both teams ground it out. Maryland may not win outright, but I’m willing to risk it because I’m positive they cover. If they cover and don’t win, I break even minus the juice. If they win outright, I risk 2 units to win 4. I’m taking that risk. For me, it’s win nothing but lose nothing, or win 4 units… Trust me; Maryland keeps this game close, and has a tremendous shot to win it. Maryland 20, Georgia Tech 17 Congrats on a great week, but this write up is one of the absolute worst theories I have ever read. To think a 20 year old kid who has been playing LB for the past 2 years is capable of playing a respectable QB in the ACC is crazy. Worse, is saying he can pass the ball because he went 7-7 in his final game as a senior in high school, that is even crazier! Bottom line to this game is simple, both teams stink, this LB playing QB will hand the ball off all day on FB dives, Tech will try and run the ball, thats what they do, stay away from the line go with the Under, as you said correctly, MD has a stout run defense. Not trying to be a dick here, just re-read what you wrote, the dude has not played offense in 2 years, and in high school, he was an option QB, MD is a pro set team, this will be one ugly game! Best of luck! |
trustandfall | 154 |
|
|
Pitt season ticket holder here, I have Va Tech as a strong play this week, couldn't believe I only had to give up 10 points. I get Pitt is due, but their problems can't be fixed in a week! It will take Cryst 2-3 years to turn this around. They are giving up 200+ yards rushing a game! Their D-Line and Linebackers STINK! O-Line shaky at best! Problem is, that is all they have, remember, they have lost their last two recruiting classes because of the coaching fiascoes!
YSU ran for 204, what do you think Va Tech will go for? Pitt scored 10 total points against Cin last week, they lost their whole D-Line from last year and still sacked Sunseri 6 TIMES! For the love of god, DO NOT BET ON PITT, there are bettter bets on the board this week. BOL no matter what way you decide! |
LetsGoFins | 14 |
|
|
Compare who the 2 teams have played, Lasalle's stats is against some of the weakest defensive clubs out there! Over inflated stats versus inferior competition!
|
StanfordAlumni | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by The_CLOZER: Don't worry about it, no explanation needed. Nice analysis, ass! |
The_CLOZER | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bighurt: xavier might be the right side.....nobody will know until they play the game.....my biggest issue is they could make this line Xavier -4 or -5 and get plenty of action on them imo.....this line seems short much as uconn seemed yesterday.....but i could be wrong.....ive been wrong before Seton Hall is a much better team then Lasalle, I don't think we realized how good until last night, but look at their schedule and roster, they are solid and will finish in the top half of the big east, this Lasalle line is no doubt fishy, but it seems they are placing a large emphasis in Xaviers last 5-6 games which were played without their full compliment of players, now that they are all back and have had a couple of games in, I think they start rolling. But I agree, we will find out tonight, that's why they play the game. GL |
Bighurt | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by The_CLOZER: Exactly why the line is at Xavier -2, sucking you suckers in Clozer...other than the line variable, what do you like about Lasalle? |
Bighurt | 23 |
|
|
Clozer...other than the line, what makes you like Lasalle tonight?
|
The_CLOZER | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stevo1: I'm on them to win SU,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 6-2-0 ATS vs 4-7-0 ATS and at home also Xav has a 0-6 ATS losing streak and 0-6 streaks are 50/50 to cover so far this season,,I'll Take La Salle at home Look who the two teams have played and their comparative SOS, it's not even close. Lasalle's ranked at 319 versus Xaviers at 67, they have built their record and stats playing lessor opponents. Now go back and see who Xavier has beaten when they had their full compliment of players, it doesn't compare. Also, Lasalle loves the 3 ball, Xavier is ranked in the top 20 in defending it, that should be a good competition to watch, who ever wins that I believe will win the game. All that being said, I was on Uconn last night -2 and lost my ass! Good luck to all no matter what way you decide! |
Bighurt | 23 |
|
|
replied to
1/4/12 $$$ The Reapers First CBB Post $$$ Plenty of Plays + 5 POD's :-O
in College Basketball Quote Originally Posted by Grimm_Reaper: And who are you? You have no posts. I have been posting plays on here forever. Not under this name, I use to have a different one also Why comment, let your plays do the talking! |
Grimm_Reaper | 35 |
|
|
Lasalles SOS 319 xavier's 67, their great defensive stats are against horrible offenses, and their offensive stats are against, on average, the 339 ranked defenses in the country. Becareful that's all.
Then again, I was on Uconn large last night -2 and had my ass handed to me. BOL! |
The_CLOZER | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StanfordAlumni: This game reminds me of the uconn/hall game. I love la salle in this spot. They put up a ton of 3's and play great D, and should be pumped up to play against xavier at home. Why xavier? Xavier is top 20 in defending the 3, its what they do well. Also, lasalle's sos is 319 while xaviers is 67, in other words, they have played no one. Go back and look at xaviers wins before the cinci fiasco, lasalle doesn't have one win that compares to them. Over inflated stats versus week competition, xavier by 10. |
neander100 | 18 |
|
|
replied to
1/4/12 $$$ The Reapers First CBB Post $$$ Plenty of Plays + 5 POD's :-O
in College Basketball
Like the Xavier play!!! Look at their SOS Lasalle is 319 vs 67 for Xavier. Look on KenPom the off and def efficiency for Lasalle is blown out of proportion due to there lack of schedule strength. Also, Lasalle gets a lot of their points from the 3, while Xavier excels at defending the 3. I think Xavier wins this by 10+, however, wouldn't suprise me to see them trailing or tied at the 30 minute mark or so, with them pulling away in the end, that's just how my large bets always end up !
GL. |
Grimm_Reaper | 35 |
|
|
What's up siz?
Happy Holiday's and best of luck bowling this year! |
RJSizzle | 216 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by chau1007: What's your unit size? Is it $1? Because you are up so many units cause you bet like over 20 units a game? Why don't you just multiply your units by 5 and make it 100 units a game? That way your units look way better than it seems. I know people say that your unit size is up to you, but when you post your units as over +200 for the season, it looks better than what it is, as to betting 1 to 5 units a game and +200 units for the year would be impressive, but not when you are betting 20 to 50 units a game. Just sayin..... Who the fuck cares!!! Odds has been around a long time and is a well respected capper here, who the fuck are you to question his units? No one has ever questioned him, his record, or his record, why do you feel the need to question his units? Maybe his unit is $10, that is what he is comfortable with, what does it matter? The dude is 18-4-1 over the past week and you want to question is units, come on man! |
oddsbuster | 108 |
|
|
I av
have kept my mouth shut for two days now, long enough, bware you are an idiot, you can't pick games, your insulting, and serve no purpose to us here on covers, please go away! |
bware | 32 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.