Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Had a parlay for $1600 and I had her +185 What bothers me is she dominated her 1st set and Halep needed a trainer and she smokes Ana 6-1? After that You go up 3-0 with 2 BREAKS at hand and you lose 6 straight games?
darn OFFFFFF |
Sarkhan | 4 |
|
|
she threw that match it was unreal. up 3-0 in 3rd set 2 break points. then had a chance to go up 4-1 on 0-40 triple break. and she loses 6 fucking games in a row.
|
Sarkhan | 4 |
|
|
Frenchman, can't you wait until the French open to state your bitterness? Your opinion means nothing in the Australian Open. He made a thread, big deal.
|
rzagza | 19 |
|
|
Giving Credit where credit is deserved, Murray has been playing well, thats for sure. Chardy pulled off a pretty big win against JMDP, he also beat Murray in Cinci, don't know how Murray was feeling then, Raonic had a W/O in the week prior over Murray, but then of course Murray goes on to win the U.S Open which at least makes me believe he wasn't feeling so bad. Regardless, I think the safer bet is Over at 31 rather then taking the +7.5 for Chardy. I feel that Chardy has made it this far and is not going to just sit back and watch Murray take it to him. Going to look for something like 6-4 7-5 6-4 or 6-4 4-6 6-2 6-2
|
xibeleli | 14 |
|
|
Sorry, I meant +7.5 spread at +112
Quote Originally Posted by llyod23:
is that +11.5 games won or +11.5 as a spread? |
lovelymoney | 69 |
|
|
And I end up spelling "you TOO" instead of Two. Fuckers
|
lovelymoney | 69 |
|
|
Get a room already you too. I have not been on this forum in a while, I went to 2 threads in this tennis forum and have both of you bitching at each other. If you have insight, write it down, keep your negative garbage to yourself and stfu. This is why I been capping to myself for the last several months, figured I would come on here to see some info before taking Chardy at +11.5 +112 or Over 31 -105.
|
lovelymoney | 69 |
|
|
Well I am officially done betting on useless tournaments such as these. These players are god damn terrible. |
txtechpika | 49 |
|
|
Same exact bet, got it at -140 to win $100.
|
cuwgolfer | 11 |
|
|
1 Unit on Igor here
|
txtechpika | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jerky969:
I'm the last guy to come on here and talk about fixes, I actually laugh at the guys who start threads titled fixed match. But the title of this tournament, coupled with the 10 people in attendance on centre court and some of the massive
Misshits were seeing is starting to change my perspective on this. Ggl doesn't even have a massive serve that warrants some of the Misshits we are seeing here
Lol I didnt even think of the name of the tournament, bet at home Cup LOL. Thats the 2nd very late OUT Call. This is getting rediculous. |
KinKAID | 32 |
|
|
Now hes arguing with a fan in the crowd LOL! The fan responds "I didnt say anything" Lopez Responds "Yes you did" Fan "No I Didnt" Its like children arguing |
KinKAID | 32 |
|
|
Umm is it me or does this match seem fixed. he ends the 1st set by smashing the ball into the back wall and then starts the 2nd set by double faulting. Lopez isnt making an effort what so ever, he is giving up on the ball. Now its 0-40 LOL |
KinKAID | 32 |
|
|
Yea! Plus my site I bet on, if he retires my -7.5 on fed would cancel out. So Shhh
|
bogaty | 4 |
|
|
Thank you Paszek, I love you. I took her +5 spread +107, when I saw her lose the first set 6-3 i got nervous, then when I saw her lose serve and it was 4-5, i was happy with a push, and then what happend after that, I cannot believe it! 6-3 7-6 = |
pinoy1da | 72 |
|
|
Heres a quick little scenario. I am not a fan of parlays, because lets face it, you need many things to happen and you need luck on your side. But if you were to make a 4 team parlay, whats stopping you from doing 4 straight wagers using the same original investment you would on a parlay. Lets assume the odds for every selection you have is all +100, so you got 4 odds at +100 (so your probably playing O/U or Spreads). You put $50 on the parlay, you go 4 for 4, you walk away with $750 + your original $50. Now, lets take the same $50 and put it on a +100 straight, you win and your up to $100 ($50 Profit), so you look for game #2 to bet on, you put $100 on +100, you win and your up to $200($150 profit), game #3 you put $200 on +100, you win and now your up to $400($350) profit, you find game #4 to bet on and you put down $400, you win again and your up to $800($750 profit). Same exact as if you would make a parlay... If you lose on the 3rd or 4th straight wagers, you have only lost your original $50 which you would have lost anyways on your parlay if you went 3/4 anyway. But atleast with the straight wager idea, you dont have to bet all 4 on the same day. You can stretch it over a few days, especially when you have so many baseball games throughout the week. This way you only concentrate 1 game at a time, and you dont have to focus on 4 things to come through right away. You could also stop at any time to, perhaps your happy with the $350 profit, you dont want to go to the 4th game, you could start over with $50 and build your new streak. I know I have read posts on here when you start with $10 and double up until you hit 10 in a row and come out with over $10,000 lol. But I am just curious to know if it makes sense to make a parlay when you can do the same thing essentially with straights using the same original bet and double up. Thoughts and Opinions? |
Sarkhan | 1 |
|
|
May i ask why you played -1 on Washington? is it because the juice is way high? ill be following your system this year, but im not betting. I will be comparing 3 different systems for the year. good luck sir!
|
therizz | 367 |
|
|
got $300 on pittzburgh (+141) . Best of Luck to the bettors
|
Mkuhi | 54 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by pramsey1843:
Do you know what percentage of series are sweeps? How often does a bottom dweller sweep a power team? How many units do you lose if the Mariners sweep the Rangers? If Joe Blanton wins game 1 for the Phillies, the next two pitchers are Halladay and Lee what are the odds of a sweep? In a vacuum, you will will most of the time, but win you lose it will be a big loss. With some common since and statistics applied, this could work. Too many factors to apply to use this all the way. I have not finished my complete research from last year, but from what i have noticed the better teams do not get swept so often. and if it were the case, if seattle was playing texas and seattle wins game 1, i place 1 unit on texas for game 2, if they dont win i place 2 units. Yes i know what you mean because chances are your juicing texas especially against seattle but even with the juice i would probably lose 6 units total on texas iif they got swept to the mariners. I can tell you so far, that there has been 2 sweeps thus far. Yankees swept baltimore and Dodgers swept Pittzburgh. But in both cases Baltimore and Pittzburgh were underdogs all the way through, so I would have lost 6 units on the 2 teams combined but I have made 13.8 units in wins, and thus my overall is 7.8 units made. Yes it is difficult to see this all the way through, in fact part of my data research is that I am doing a month by month breakdown for every team. This way I can see when most of the sweeps do occur and I can analyze. I can tell you 1 reason I skip the first week of baseball is because for some reason teams like Boston and Yankees dont start well. I hope to finish gathering info for the other 20 teams from last year so I can see where the numbers stand. |
pramsey1843 | 499 |
|
|
Hey there good luck with your system. I am trying out my own type of system as well. I am using the contest to keep track of the records and units. Essentially all I'm doing is once a new series begins, whichever teams win the first game, I play the opposite for game 2, if they lose again, I double the unit for game 3,
Example: jays vs cleveland. Jays win game 1, 1 unit on cleveland game 2. Cleveland loses again. 2 units on game 3. Although on the contest I am using 300 and 500 unit bets because there is no 250 option and I am recording separate data with $100 and $200 unit bets in my spreadsheet. In a 4 game series I am doing $50 then 100 Then 200. I am not actually betting this year as I am just collecting data. I have done research on last year but I have only collected from 10 teams but they have produced 30 units but that can go either way once I collect data from all 30 teams. Essentially the whole purpose of this system is the less sweeps that occur the more money will be made. I skip the first week of all sports so from series #2 the system is 12-8 with +7.80 units. Sorry for posting this in your thread just wanted your opinion about this system. Anyways ill be following up all season, best of luck!
|
pramsey1843 | 499 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.