Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Game over, nice vandy blowout. I give Houston maybe 10 points after it gets ugly.
|
GQStatus | 3 |
|
|
I think everyone agrees the over is due, but I don't see where anyone is taking into account that this is one of the earliest starts for these two teams all year. See a sluggish start early, plus BC has the fewest avg plays per game than any other team at 60.7 compared to 84 for Arizona. Given the size discrepancy have to feel BC wants to methodically move the ball downfield and limit Arizonas play count by controlling the clock. Lean under, obviously total will rely on who can dictate pace of game.
|
saigonbynight | 4 |
|
|
replied to
2013 Florida State Seminoles will go down as the best team in history..
in College Football
I find it absolutely halairous that people want to use point differential to compare dominance between past teams. I guess people don't look at things objectively and notice how much the game has evolved over the years(SOS aside). The game has changed since even the 2001 hurricanes took the field, a lot more airing it out and spread offenses in today's game, lord those teams in the 60s only put up 24-28 points, wow they must have sucked. Give me a break and actually use some damn sense before you start throwing out stats to compare teams over 10 years apart. It's funny people want so badly for something to be true that they're willing to make themselves look like idiots just to try to prove a point.
|
XLR8 | 125 |
|
|
Coming from a life long bama fan, take the Shockers. We will keep it close for the first half but will go through one of our famous 5 min scoring droughts in the 2nd half and lose by 10+. I for the life of me don't understand this line, about 4 points lower than I thought it would be. Take the shockers anything below 8.
|
scalabrine | 61 |
|
|
replied to
Somebody with sense explain to me Why FL ST. is favored by so much vs Auburn
in College Football
Bighungrynole, I went and looked at the draft projections and for some reason I don't see a single Florida St player in the projected first round. I did however find a Florida player, maybe they messed up and meant to put Florida st. #delusional #ACC #makesmyplayerslookbetterthantheyare
|
pnutt | 64 |
|
|
So you're admitting Bama is better, why would any fan argue with you on that one? Onthemound, don't worry, I'm sure Brando will endorse your second place trophy. Geaux Tigers! We're No. 2!! Get some.
|
pnutt | 53 |
|
|
replied to
'Bama -10.5 at Auburn.................................................................
in College Football
Bama hard on eh? Geaux Tigers! THE REAL 2013 National Champions! Why? Because we beat auburn and auburn going to beat down the turds, hail Les, hail tigers!
|
gridironguy | 202 |
|
|
replied to
'Bama -10.5 at Auburn.................................................................
in College Football
You're right LSU is the real 2011 Champs, I forgot they clinched it when they crossed the 50 for the first time in the 4th qtr. Go Tigers!
|
gridironguy | 202 |
|
|
replied to
'Bama -10.5 at Auburn.................................................................
in College Football
Onthemound5, I thought you said auburn was going to end alabama's reign? I'm confused why you are talking about an Alabama/FSU national championship matchup. Do I need to cancel my Auburn ML bet now? Please help, I'm soo lost.
|
gridironguy | 202 |
|
|
With the big difference being Stanfords game on the 15th was USC, while washington's was Portland State. Ask yourself, if you were the head coach, how much time would you really prepare for Portland State?
|
geezytha8man | 28 |
|
|
Every college football team sets goals before the season, and every single one of them starts with winning their conference, yes that includes Alabama. Point being this game means a heck of a lot more to washington than the lsu game, and please try to argue that with me.
|
badlands | 18 |
|
|
I'm sorry but please find me a team that has a nonconference game circled on their schedule and Notre Dame does not count.
|
badlands | 18 |
|
|
Time off yes, time to prepare no.
|
badlands | 18 |
|
|
Sorry you're right, I forgot washington had to invest a lot of time into preparing for portland st. Give me a break, washington had this game circled all year and started preparing for it after they got thumped by lsu.
|
badlands | 18 |
|
|
Under 48, fully expect Stanford letdown but just feel the line is taking that into account and is pretty sharp. The total on the other hand is not taking the letdown into account, believe its 4 to 5 points to high with the potential for this one to soar under. Good luck.
|
geezytha8man | 28 |
|
|
Under 48, Stanford with less time to prepare following an emotional win on the road = letdown spot. Stanford will obviously be able to run but expect them to come out flat and struggle in the early going. Stanford wants to play physical and control the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. I have a feeling its going to be a pretty sloppy game with the team winning the turnover battle coming out on top. Good luck, hope everyone wins some coin tonight.
|
badlands | 18 |
|
|
Lsu all the way, bama fan here, we have no depth, we will have more turnovers this half, and the shooting will only get worse as those legs tire
|
sloop703 | 17 |
|
|
Go ahead and double it up by taking lsu second half if the line looks decent, bama has no depth now and will get worse as the game goes on, tired legs, we'll lose by more than twenty
|
skulkraker | 11 |
|
|
Lsu whatever, those suspensions will kill us, won't have the depth to pressure like normal, not to mention we will probably have eblen at point now, very prone to turnovers (last game green and releford accounted for 34 of our 68 points, they are both suspended)
|
Q_the_money | 17 |
|
|
No I bet the same amount on each play, I don't fall into plays of the year, think they're a good way to piss most of your winnings away, and for the record I didn't play this game, just enjoy nropps thoughts on games, and I believe im entitled to give my opinion in a free forum
|
nropp11 | 78 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.