Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I like Cinn. to win this and cover -8 1/2. U know, Minn. can be scrappy at times. Minn getting some players back from injury. Could boost their play some what, I am sure. Minn. had some real luck last week and played over their heads. I think those would you believe it plays want happen this week. So no repeat for them. I would be careful on giving up to many points here.
|
Covers | 20 |
|
|
O yes, hawks in driver seat, want let off gas, can they stay focused, they should. Hawks by 20.
|
Covers | 27 |
|
|
U know, Atlanta seem to give San Fran. trouble at all times. San Fran wins but not cover. No need for them to go all out. Just enough to win.
|
Covers | 51 |
|
|
Carolina Off. is 14.8 average across the board. Defense is 5.2 average across the board.
Tampa is 26.80 average across the board. Defense is 14.8 across the board. Tampa home field is worth about 1pt. I will go with Tampa + 7 cause it is around a 4pt ball game. I do like the under 41 also. It should hit around 37 to 38. Just my on crap stuff. |
Covers | 80 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DJNY:
You may need to speak to DrDogs, or maybe just a doctor to get some help. Your speech is impaired and Akron is NOT at HOME. When I see reasoning like this it really makes me want to open a casino. It's like seeing the drunk guy demand a hit on a hard 18 with a dealer 6...I've seen it...smh...Come on people, can we clean up these threads PLEASE!?
Well excuse me for being human,DJNY. If I want to be perfect I will want to call on you for sure. Yes I got the home and road mixed up but I do know what I wanted to say i just put it down wrong. Crap just happens for no reason, it does. One thing, the underdog on the road will cover and I like the over now that is has going down. I will play at game time. |
Covers | 96 |
|
|
Well, lets see. Tol. back is hurt, will they risk his injury futher, well I don't think so unless, they may send him in in the second half if they need to. I just don't see them risking futher damage. Even though Akron has (1) win they have been very capable of winning more, they are that close. I see them covering this spread but may end up short but they can win this out right with Tol. Fluellen out of the line up. This will change the game dramatically for Toledo. That will put lots of pressure on the QB, not good changes to the offense and on the road. Akron will be up for this game at home. Pt. for me in this one. I did like the over a bunch but with Fluellen out that is out the window for now. I'm takeing the points very Large here. Now these are just my thoughts.
|
Covers | 96 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by O-tie:
My early plays after doing some study. Here we go on early plays and my on thinking. Play at your own feels good to you!! Nth.West. +6', U-44, Penn. St. -17, O-56, B. Green -pts. as long as it stays u-5 or lower, O-47, C-Mich.-4',u-63. There is no sure thing on any game, you must know that. I do not bet a team just because I like them. It is how they match-up and special teams,defense I say. Good luck to all. Will post some later games as well. |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by moneymagoo:
Went with duke +28.5, Fl St kicked the D off of there helmet and they had a QB and team. Cant see maryland doing any thing. FLORIDA ST - 31 JMT on this play. Maryland 3 & OUT all night long. A worn-out Terp. Def. you will see by half time. This is also when you see injurys accure on Def. side which will be in Fla. ST. favor. I see them wanting to make a better statement than their foe Clems-son. There are lots of reason for that & you should know that.. I will give up what ever pts. and watch college basketball. It ain't -Ah going to be pretty. |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
I like the Under in this game. I thinking 59 or 60 total scores. I would love for the line to get below 10' here, I think it will by game time. N. Ill is averaging 49 pts at home-Tol. is averaging 33 on the road. N.Ill. is averaging giving up on def. 17 pts a game while Tol. is giving up on def. 27.8 on the road. Tol. has had the tuffer schedual as I see it. Just something to throw at you.
|
Covers | 73 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by saladpuncher] Look fubes -- I think NIU be relying on that qb for too much they flava...gonna cause probs on wed-nes-day. Toledo mud hens or whatever win this one straight up.... What does Uconn have to do with this game. So what if they do rely on their QB. They have some back also that can run. I like this tripple threat back field = dangerious. Team like this causes problems for the opposing team secondary, someone will get open. Teams like this are hard to defend and I think, only thinking, Toledo will have their hands full. I give Toledo credit they are not to bad, but special team play is another questions. I may have to eat my words, any team can beat another team on any given day. You have to play over you head to do so for full 4 quarters. |
Covers | 73 |
|
|
I like Ball St. at home. They seem to stay focused better game to game. I thinks they have the better QB. In the running department they both seem pretty equal. Receivers dep. goes to B-ST. Their schedual was stronger and that make for a better team & play on both side of the ball. I like their special teams better. I see them covering here. May not be as close as you think. Ball ST. 28---20. |
Covers | 55 |
|
|
I believe Cocks move the ball well with their other horses in the back field. Remember last yr. when Latamore got hurt, they just got better. I will give the pts. here and enjoy the game. I see the Def. ends giving the Razorbacks all the want. This is pay back and they have not forgotten about it. Cocks by 24. Just my thoughts. 38--14 win.
|
Covers | 12 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by DOC-HOLLIDAY-58]
WELL, I Thought the Colts gm on Thursday night was too easy, Indy -3 everyone one this site , saying the same shit o its shady, o its this blah blah. Louie too good fck syracuse.. Hey, not me I was on the Colts and Under 43 for a nice piece of the pie. Just read my past post on the game.
|
Covers | 39 |
|
|
What happend over at Capping the Game site? It seem to have been down for 3 day or so. I was just curious. I like Ind. here also. I hope to get 8 if possible. They are tuff at home and will be ready for the Badgers. They are in a good situation looking a the shot at the Champion ship game. This should inspire them to play hard, maybe a out right win for them. |
Covers | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bkg1010:
Tigers gave Bama all they wanted, just came up short! Big let down spot here for LSU I think. Tigers are notorious for playing down to their opponent. Which LSU teams shows up?
Miss State coming off 2 straight losing efforts will have to play much better than they showed against AM, or this will get ugly, if good LSU shows up!
Early lean, LSU minus something less than 14 I hope.
Good Grife!!! Time to fade Miss.ST. right out the door. Death Valley is going to be horrible place for Miss.ST. today. I bet they get it handed to them on a platter, they are totally overated. Maybe nest yr. but not this yr. LSU by a bunch. Be no let down for the Tigers. They must cover in high # to get that better bowl bid here boys. Giving them pts. up here. 32-6 for home boys!!!!! |
Covers | 8 |
|
|
A lot of guys bet for all the wrong reason. I get myself in some situation like that also. I see the Colts on a up swing & Jags on down spin, over anxious causes mistakes after mistakes. They just can't think straight to play straight. They can't not jell as a unit team. I saw a lot of good stuff last week game Colts played. They beat a good def. team, I thought they could not. I will take the better qb here, the better improving def. here and give up the -3 and take the under. I just don't see big points on both side, just one side slighty over 20, around 24-jmg. These are just my thought & they are better than my guesses. No repeat here, diff. year, diff. players & play.
|
Covers | 127 |
|
|
I seeing homefield being a factor here but not to much but just enought to pull it out by 9 pts. So it is a tight play for both teams. UlM just got their but kicked and on the road to try to put it behind them. I believe Ark.ST. is more a complete team at this time and it shows in their play. I am pulling the trigger on home team and hope for some Created-turn-overs for home team defense. I see UlM a little to anxious pulling the trigger + bad choices in trying to redeam its self........ JMO. |
Covers | 51 |
|
|
I don't see Virg. Tech. Doing much with Fla. ST. with their speed & aggression. I think V-tech. will make some big time mistakes greated by Fla. ST. boys. V-tech is so up and down, unpredictable. Fla.ST. boy will do what Clem-son's did create problems. I will give up the points and say V-tech. is on a down spin. We all have watched both play and they're going in opposite direction as I it. I really like Fla.ST boys special team better and that creates alot of posssesion time and points. Fla.ST. --- the points.
|
Covers | 61 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by shawnb2007:
Oklahoma will beat Iowa St by at least 20 Stoops is 19-0 off a loss and wins by an average 16.5 points per game in those wins off a loss ! If you are smart you will take Oklahoma . 45-17 my predicition Oklahoma I did play/more value and a better team. Okla. can be esplosive that said Iowa St be hard pressed to keep up! Teams I took. Fla., Okla. Minn, AirForce, Miss.St., Baylor, Ohio St., Mississippi, Indiana, Ark. ST. Oh Man, I feel good about them. You need some luck on your side some time. Good luck to all. |
Covers | 22 |
|
|
I like Ind. also especially at home. They can score pretty quickly as they do. Iowa is fading fast. Ind. by 2 scores. Just my thoughts.
|
Covers | 15 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.