Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
good luck during the debates, obama will get buried KOAJ....you are being delusional to think that McCain can beat Obama in a debate. Don't let you hate blind you wise son. Seriously....check out McCain's performance in the Republican debates and his recent events where he has been put on the spot by someone...he becomes flustered and angry...it will be JFK/Nixon all over again
|
SarasotaSlim | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TIMBER9:
However it will be close, the dems will be in the projects with buses loading up the worst of the worst promising food and smokes for an Obama vote so it will be tight (and YES this will happen!) what is that supposed to mean?....everyone that lives in the project is the worst of the worst that's a pretty terrible view man |
SarasotaSlim | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TIMBER9:
Any of the four will beat Obama.... His act is tired now! imagine what it'll be like come november. Obama will vanish like a fart in the wind. then you better get to work on the 6% of your population that wants to vote for Bob Barr...giving Obama the delegates down there |
SarasotaSlim | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
win win win for mccain...as long as he keeps his mouth shut that is the only way McCain can win....everytime he opens his mouth he is either flip-flopping or misspeaking about the existence of a former country, etc. from my inside people, there are rumblings in the GOP that McCain will gently step aside mid-August a week before the Democratic Convention |
SarasotaSlim | 41 |
|
|
Pokerbroker-
why not action as of yet?...evidence seems pretty clear cut in this thread.
|
Zodiac_Killer | 136 |
|
|
Who actually thinks John McCain will be the nominee of the Republican Party come August?
That is the more likely scenario that the GOP invents some sort of health problem for McCain and they insert Powell/Romney/Rice
|
SarasotaSlim | 41 |
|
|
gfinger's post has no place in any of these forums
|
MuEagles79 | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
mu - its a combination of demand destruction coming from washington and the pump people are buying less and there is some belief that washington may look to add supply to the mkt even if its 3 years out it doesnt matter...these are futures agreed 69's claim is just ridiculous |
69_Amazin_Mets | 39 |
|
|
69 & SS-
this thread shows how clueless you guys are:
"Sharply increased crude and gasoline supplies were the immediate cause of Wednesday's decline. The Energy Information Administration reported that U.S. crude oil supplies rose by 3 million barrels, or 1 percent, last week. That is the opposite of the 3 million barrel draw analysts surveyed by energy research firm Platts expected. Gasoline supplies also leapt unexpectedly."
do you both enjoy being owned so thoroughly and so often |
69_Amazin_Mets | 39 |
|
|
created a topic
The "Straight Talk Express" becomes the Flip-Flop Express: McCain Shifts on Afghanistan
in Politics
https://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/mccain-shifts-p.html
Here's a non-inclusive list of all of McCain's flip-flops he has had while campaigning over the past year 1. Drilling in coastal waters 2. Support of Donald Rumsfield's handling of the Iraq War 3. Accepting public campaign funds 4. Bush Tax Cuts for the wealthy 5. Roe v. Wade 6. Jerry Fawell/Christian Conservatives 7. Ethanol 8. Confederate Flag 9. Equal Pay for Women 10. Immigration Reform 11. Terrorist Attacks helping Republicans 12. Windfall Profits Tax on Oil Companies 13. Privatizing Social Security 14. Balancing the Budget in his First Term 15. Estate Tax and now..... 16. McCain Shifts Position on More US Troops to AfghanistanJuly 15, 2008 5:20 PM While Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, was seeming defensive on Iraq today, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., was changing his position on Afghanistan. Just last week, McCain was calling for the U.S.'s NATO allies to increase their troop presence in Afghanistan and was resisting calls for more U.S. troops there. “I would like to have our allies make a bigger commitment, both in personnel and other ways,” McCain said in Portsmouth, Ohio. “I’d like to hear from our military leaders, our chairman of the joint chiefs, as well as the military commanders there.” McCain foreign policy aide Randy Scheunemann told the Boston Globe that there needed to be more NATO troops, and "there is no easy answer, but clearly Pakistan needs to do more to crack down there." This was quite a contrast from Obama, who since August 2007 has been calling for at least two additional U.S. brigades in Afghanistan. A contrast, that is…until today. "Our commanders on the ground in Afghanistan say that they need at least three additional brigades," McCain said today at a town hall in Albuquerque. "Thanks to the success of the surge, these forces are becoming available, and our commanders in Afghanistan must get them." During a trip to Afghanistan in 2006, McCain resisted such a call, saying when asked if more US troops were needed, "If it's necessary, we will, and I'm sure we would be agreeable, but the focus here is more on training the Afghan National Army and the police, as opposed to the increased U.S. troop presence." Speaking to reporters on his bus today after his speech, McCain rejected the notion that he and Obama have similar plans for the region. "He's just said we need more troops," McCain said. "There is a dramatic difference. He's never been to Afghanistan, he's never been briefed on Afghanistan personally by the commanders." Moreover, McCain asserted, Obama doesn't see the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as connected, as does McCain. "If we fail in Iraq, it would have meant enormous encouragement to the Taliban in Afghanistan and other anti-American elements and jihadists throughout the region," McCain said. "And so to say, we could have let Iraq fail, as Senator Obama said,...that would have had a devastating effect in my view on our reliability in the region, that the willingness of our allies to cooperate with us in Afghanistan, and so they are connected. In life and warfare, failure breeds failure, success breeds success. That is just a lesson of history, and Senator Obama obviously does not understand those lessons." McCain also repeated a charge first made by Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, against Obama -- that he chairs a Foreign Affairs subcommittee with oversight over NATO operations and yet "he's never had a hearing. He's never had a hearing. So I am not surprised that all he has done is said, 'Well, we need more troops.'" Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Joe Biden, D-Del, rejected that accusation in a statement to ABC News. "The reason Senator Obama didn’t chair a NATO and Afghanistan subcommittee hearing is because I did, as Chairman of the Committee….when it comes to the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq, we hold those hearings at the full committee level,” he said. |
MuEagles79 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kujayhwk: Mu:
It is sad when a couple Cover's mods that like 69AM will team up to throw one of their fellow mods under the wheels of the bus, in full view of the Cover's community.
This site certainly took a giant step backward that day. I wonder what will happen the next time one of those moderators boxes someone for questionable reasons |
PokerBroker | 199 |
|
|
replied to
A level of stalking and obsession not even reached by SecondAgain, Marino, or Oldlineman
in Penalty Box Quote Originally Posted by 69_Amazin_Mets: I bring lots of stuff upon myself because I am a smart ass. I know that, and deserve some of what I get.
Mu attacks me because we have different political views. I think that is the reason. wrong 69- I made sure CT knew of your infractions because you are a racist who was only allowed out of the Penalty Box on the condition that you only post one new thread a day in the Politics Forum. I posted the second thread because you got the first thread locked with your non-pertinent comments. I know you are unable happy that someone is out there pointing out your racist comments and complete lack of respect for the Covers Moderators CollectNow- which alias are you now? SAF. |
69_Amazin_Mets | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by chillery: Its simple, 69Mets is either related to one of the members of the covers team or he has some dirty pictures that involve beastiality with one or more of the covers team and is threatening to put it on YOU TUBE or Jerry Springer. 3. It is all about the bottom line for CT. Different standard of justice for users who bring a lot of hits to the site. Heard a rumor floated around here a few weeks ago that 69 Mets is an alias used by one of the most popular members around these parts and is just used to post the craziest shit possible in any respect, CT got absolutely pantsed in this instance. Why would anyone respect their authority now when it has been shown that you can directly disobey a Moderators rules for release from the Penalty Box and just get away with a private email??? |
PokerBroker | 199 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2: I guess maybe this explains why Republicans have such contempt for the law and the constitution. |
69_Amazin_Mets | 13 |
|
|
CT-
Thanks for once again a timely and informative response. |
MuEagles79 | 12 |
|
|
probably better served in the Penalty Box than the politics forum
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=87&sub=929861 |
MuEagles79 | 3 |
|
|
unemployed middle age men who pretend to be truck drivers
|
69_Amazin_Mets | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheGreatToby: if he made a racist comment then they should box him for life, sorry69 but thats not cool(if it's true) yeah...its pretty amazing they let him out and then he gives the big middle finger to everyone involved. Pretty screwed up individual 69 is....first proven to be a racist and then proven to be a dishonest backstabbing liar....good stuff |
PokerBroker | 199 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Helmut: Then I'll move myself off shore. ummm....if you can't afford to pay the $2,700 in back debt, then you probably can't afford to move offshore either....just a thought |
Helmut | 39 |
|
|
replied to
A level of stalking and obsession not even reached by SecondAgain, Marino, or Oldlineman
in Penalty Box
maybe I wouldn't have to create another thread if you didn't get the other one locked...check out stalker Bob/69 posting just a half an hour after I created the 2nd thread....stalker alert...stalker alert
why are you afraid of someone asking a question to CT? enjoy your freedom 69 |
69_Amazin_Mets | 30 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.