Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Texas just plunged a knife deep into the heart of the DBags |
Digitalkarma | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
Missing in action for this one, eh fellas?
Nah mate, not missing at all. Just waiting quietly and patiently for you to put your foot deep into your mouth by getting carried away with the rare Slam where this moronic approach actually works before deciding to post the stats that blow this BS idiotic moronic approach out of the water. |
rzagza | 61 |
|
|
Now, that final figure includes retirement results being paid out on. Here I've been generous. 5 retirement winners contribute +30.08 units to that figure, whereas 16 retirement losses in turn obviously only contribute -16.00 units. So, if one bet this horrific strategy at a book that didn't pay out on retirement results, then a further -14.08 units would have to get added to the final total, making for a greater than 410 unit loss. DOUBLE-OUCH! From 2009's AO to 2015's USO, this strategy had its followers down 257.70 units, an average of -9.20 units per Slam. From 2016's AO to 2018's FO, this strategy has its followers down 139.84 units, that's an average of -13.98 units per Slam. So in the last couple of years this strategy has on average become even more disasterous to follow than it had already been. Neutral readers, you have been warned. Don't even think to touch this betting approach with 5 barge-poles all tied together. You deserve better than to live on the streets with junkies and lowlifes. The positive results from the occasional Slams where this approach has worked well (2013's Wimbledon, 2014's FO & USO, and 2018's Wimbledon) are simply smoke & mirrors. The utter beating you'll take most of the rest of the time will quickly turn those rare positive Slams into distant memories. |
KiwiSportsFan | 13 |
|
|
2015 AO wins - 4 (+32.17) losses - 39 -6.83 units
FO wins - 7 (+43.90) losses - 39 +4.90 units
Wimbledon wins - 6 (+27.07) losses - 45 -17.93 units
USO wins - 4 (+22.75) losses - 42 -19.25 units
2016 AO wins - 12 (+55.80) losses - 41 +14.80 units
FO wins - 5 (+28.30) losses - 32 -3.70 units
Wimbledon wins - 4 (+21.40) losses - 40 -18.60 units
USO wins - 4 (+15.50) losses - 37 -21.50 units
2017 AO wins - 3 (+14.00) losses - 31 -17.00 units
FO wins - 7 (+23.08) losses - 43 -19.92 units
Wimbledon wins - 2 (+10.25) losses - 28 -17.75 units
USO wins - 4 (+16.83) losses - 39 -22.17 units
2018 AO wins - 8 (+29.00) losses - 35 -6.00 units
FO wins - 2 (+11.00) losses - 40 -29.00 units
That's a grand final total of -397.54 units. OUCH! |
KiwiSportsFan | 13 |
|
|
WTA +300 Dog results in Slams since the start of 2009
2009 AO wins - 5 (+43.48) losses - 48 -4.52 units
FO wins - 9 (+41.55) losses - 47 -5.45 units
Wimbledon wins - 8 (+31.43) losses - 59 -27.57 units
USO wins - 8 (+45.13) losses - 49 -3.87 units
2010 AO wins - 7 (+35.91) losses - 59 -23.09 units
FO wins - 6 (+29.15) losses - 52 -22.85 units
Wimbledon wins - 7 (+27.47) losses - 51 -23.53 units
USO wins - 10 (+44.81) losses - 44 +0.81 units
2011 AO wins - 5 (+19.54) losses - 49 -29.46 units
FO wins - 5 (+25.56) losses - 44 -18.44 units
Wimbledon wins - 8 (+37.36) losses - 47 -9.64 units
USO wins - 8 (+45.09) losses - 44 +1.09 units
2012 AO wins - 7 (+35.87) losses - 53 -17.13 units
FO wins - 6 (+46.81) losses - 49 -2.19 units
Wimbledon wins - 7 (+36.20) losses - 35 +1.20 units
USO wins - 10 (+52.70) losses - 49 +3.70 units
2013 AO wins - 6 (+38.62) losses - 54 -15.38 units
FO wins - 5 (+17.64) losses - 48 -30.36 units
Wimbledon wins - 8 (+62.90) losses - 35 +27.90 units
USO wins - 6 (+29.25) losses - 47 -17.75 units
2014 AO wins - 6 (+33.30) losses - 48 -14.70 units
FO wins - 6 (+55.41) losses - 46 +9.41 units
Wimbledon wins - 8 (+35.51) losses - 42 -6.49 units
USO wins - 11 (+58.72) losses - 49 +9.72 units
|
KiwiSportsFan | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
Where’s Kiwi Rider with the upset tampon tally? Oh he’s not here. Did any top 10 women’s players make it out of 1st 2 rounds besides Halep and Keys?
I knew this idiot would be all excitied because of recent resuklts. I knew his moronic memory would forget the damning stats I said I had collated. So just for this idiot, I'll post the stats to shut his stupid fcuking mouth for once and for all. |
rzagza | 26 |
|
|
Also, Wash had won 10 straight against Miami, they are their daddies. SF isn't STL's daddy. |
BIGDTITLE | 27 |
|
|
If FIFA wanted England to advance, Colombia would've had their head-butting idiot red carded in the first half. |
Doubleadownon12 | 3 |
|
|
u2.5 - Danes will be super defensive. |
PublicJoe | 9 |
|
|
2 or 3 more losers (depending on whether one's book pays out on retirements) Petkovic +900 Mertens +350 Tsurenko +500 (retirement)
Winners - 2 (+11 units) Losers - 39/40
For fun I decided to go back over the last's 10 years worth of Slam results and - with 8 years worth of results collated & 2 to go - you guessed it, this fucking terrible approach would've sent its adherents to the poor house: but hey, maybe the 2 years I've yet to track will see everything turn around. Pigs might fly, too. Will post up those stats when I have the time. |
rzagza | 61 |
|
|
This is the true final. It's winner will beat either American. But if that American is Keys, it'll be back up the brinks truck unloading time, even for Halep. That's how badly I rate Keys' mentality on a Slam final kind of stage. |
SixGod | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CodyBanks:
Shout out to Kiwi for exposing you this tournament :) Good Weekend to everyone else :)
Good job, CB. I'd have gone back and gathered those stats once this FO ended if you hadn't already done so. This latest plea that I've failed to record any number of winners to make things look worse than they purportedly are is one of the stupidest comebacks I've ever received from someone whose misrepresentations of reality I've questioned. As if the moment a big dog cashed and I failed to record here it the day of the occurrence our fraud and/or his mate here wouldn't have been in like a flash accusing me then & there of trying to make things look worse than they are. Lets see how his mate tries to defend him making this absurd assertion about my failing to record some positive results.
|
rzagza | 61 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
Kiwi, I'm in awe of the amount of winners you dont provide here. But why make predictions when you can never be wrong if you dont make any? Amirite, brotato chip?
The fraud speaks.
Hey fraud, post all "the winners" I'm failing to record. |
rzagza | 61 |
|
|
do all majors for the past 10 years He only has to go back over the last 8 Slams and if he finds that just 2 haven't been profitable will mean we will then know the thread creator has been misrepresenting the profitability of this purported no-need-to-cap approach to tennis (since he has repeatedly posted that this approach has only once failed to turn a profit over the last 8 Slams). ------------- The mammoth run of losers finally ended. Even I'm surprised it took this long.
Winners Buzarnescu +400 Losers Parmentier +700
Winners - 2 (+11 units) Losers - 37 |
rzagza | 61 |
|
|
LBJ has chemists working for him, that's for sure. Bespoke masking agents ahead of their time are costly. |
gamblorman | 27 |
|
|
Anyone blaming JR is a clown. Blame the guy who can't make a simple FT for a 1 pt lead with minimal ticks left. HE lost the Cavs the game. |
Doubleadownon12 | 30 |
|
|
Another 3 losers Another 3 Losers
Sasnovich +500
Bogdan +450
Peng +400
Winners - 1 (7 units)
Losers - 36
|
rzagza | 61 |
|
|
Another 3 losers Ferro +1200 Watson +500 Townsend +900 Winners - 1 (7 units) Losers - 33
|
rzagza | 61 |
|
|
Vegas came back from being down twice in game 1 They only ever came back from 1 goal deficits in g1; they've not come back to win a game after trailing by 2 goals - as they did here - in the entire playoffs. So, their comebacks in g1 offer no meaningful basis to make that bet.
hasn't lost at home all playoffs They lost to the Sharks at home (4-3 in OT) in g2 of that 2nd round series. So this statement offers no meaningful basis to make that bet.
Do people, when making up fairy stories, not realise others will actually pay attention to reality when appraising their value? What a laugh it would be for this bet to win, and this _____ ends up cashing on the basis of pure delusions. In the long run, it would actually harm him to win because then he'd learn nothing.
|
Doubleadownon12 | 8 |
|
|
Since the Conference Finals started, no team has come back to win from trailing after 2 periods. |
Dangerbay | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.