Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by JakeLake720: How was it stupid? Of course it makes sense..What's the difference between being up 4 or 5? The answer to that is nothing..If you go up six, you could possibly go to OT on an extra point block or miss (not likely but worth a shot)..Do you guys actually pay attention to game situation? It would be stupid not to go for two there! Yep.
|
Pinkhuffy129 | 9 |
|
|
And as mentioned during the broadcast, Arizona leads the league over the past couple years in blocked kicks.
|
Pinkhuffy129 | 9 |
|
|
Hoping for the blocked PAT. 26-21 won't do you any good against a td, 27-21 there's a small possibility a blocked PAT could get you OT.
|
Pinkhuffy129 | 9 |
|
|
Sunday Night Football Football
|
Dumpandchase | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LiLMonsta: yea you will lose.. you have to count all your sets that won. then add 3.. if Cilic lose.. 6-4 4-6 6-4 then you won by 1 set... I think he's talking about the regular game spread... +2.5 sets would guarantee a win in non-majors
|
need2cover | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by need2cover: So, how about I have +3. And, the match goes 6-4, 6-2. Will I still lose? And maybe I misread, if you were saying that Berdych had the sixes, in a 6-4, 6-2 match, Berdych won 12 games and Cilic won 6, so even +3, thats only 9 and you still lose.
|
need2cover | 12 |
|
|
Cilic +2.5 would win a 6-2, 2-6, 4-6 match because adding 2.5 to his 12 games won gives him 14.5 games won vs. Berdych's 14 games won.
|
need2cover | 12 |
|
|
The spread is simply the number of games a player gets/loses.
If You had Cilic +3, In your 6-4, 6-2 example, Cilic would've won 12 games to Berdych's 6. Add on the +3, and you definitely win, 15-6.
|
need2cover | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by fsutomahawk: Yea, I had a medium size play on Wawrinka and that was it. Same.
|
namethegame | 8 |
|
|
Good thing you made another thread...I missed the first two with the same title.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=38&sub=101613501 https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=38&sub=101613552
|
bigdaddy911 | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Theone324: Putintseva +120 Schiavone +130 GL Took Schiavone as well, at +138. |
Theone324 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DR225: Is there any possibility that Mugro tanks since his match in Monte Carlo is 16 hours away? If he's already in Houston and has to play at least two sets if he were to tank it, why not just play hard and try to win?
|
xibeleli | 7 |
|
|
Scoreboard.com had Isner up 2-0 in the first. Apparently something got crossed somewhere.
Hopefully they get internet working soon. Their twitter said it was the whole area. You'd think they'd try mobile hotspots or something as opposed to a slow twitter feed, this is an ATP event afterall.
|
Theone324 | 28 |
|
|
Ah, read it incorrectly.
Anyways, hope Isner continues in the second!
|
Theone324 | 28 |
|
|
Isner took the first set 7-5, after breaking Sock in the first game.
|
Theone324 | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BrianLaverty: Not sure where you are getting your info from, but its 4-3 Isner.. on serve... with no breaks so far. Because 5 minutes before you posted, it was 2-1 Isner serving.
How could Isner be up 4-3 and serving with no breaks? |
Theone324 | 28 |
|
|
Isner with the early break, serving up 2-1.
|
Theone324 | 28 |
|
|
Nah, play started as scheduled. Storm knocked out internet (and live scores) last night. You can find some score updates on their twitter
|
njnspigly | 11 |
|
|
They're playing, but a storm knocked out their internet last night, so live scores aren't available at the moment.
They're giving some updates on twitter https://twitter.com/mensclaycourt
|
benny987 | 5 |
|
|
Querrey just withdrew.
|
benny987 | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.