Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by YaMon:
WHOA... Is it true?? The IS IT RIGGED PICKS go 1-3 SU but 3-1 ATS. I personally did play the picks, but grabbed ca$h this weekend with Teasers. Stay tuned for more IS IT RIGGED PICKS, later this week. This thread isn't about picking against the spead,don't lose site of that. The original article said that the NFL had the season rigged so that these ten teams would be in the playoffs with three dogs winning straight up and one favorite winning the first week. Remember the NFL wanted to keep the Tiki barber train alive and running in the playoffs and how the NFL set up Mangini to overcome his master.And how the NFL was making Romo the new golden boy of the league all while they were wrapping it up in a pretty bow and handing it too us because the fix is in. Well, if they did such a good job, why'd they screw it up in the playoffs. Also in the Seattle game, the NFL went above and beyond with that safety, they are really getting creative. How long do you think they rehearsed where Glen fumbles, the Seahawk player almost gets it but right on cue, puts his toes on the line so that they can't get the touchdown. Bravo NFL Bravo. Then, they screw the golden boy with the fumble, all while sucking us into betting on the wrong side. What about the people on the other side of the so called fix. Is it fixed to them. Too many people, too much money, NO F-IN WAY. The NFL only stands to lose from being caught fixing games, it is a nearly perfect run league compared to the others and they rake in BILLIONS. And I am also going to go out on a limb and say that Vegas in not sabataging covers with their spies. Losing streaks happen, bad calls happen, stupid plays happen, live with it.
|
YaMon | 137 |
|
|
1. Look, the people with the thoery should have to prove that it true, not just make statemets and make other people disprove them. Maybe the explosions had something to do with the giany Boeings burning in the tower. I saw the video and it was creepy, but then reality set in and there are things do disprove everything.
2. Alright, let's say they gave the Patriots one championship, did they give them all three or did they earn the other two? Or maybe they were just real good. Na, that can't be it.
3. It's not fixed
4.You would take Bush, I would take Bush but they didn't. It doesn't mean it's fixed. GM's overate combines
And of course its decided on the field, and humans make mistake on calls, it's a fast game with alot going on. What proof do you have about highly influential forces at play in the games. It's just a wild statement with no conclusive proof so how do I prove that wrong.
Seahawks still got robbed
As the great Mitch Headburg said, "I think Bigfoots blurry, that the problem. It isn't the photographers fault"
Disprove that
|
YaMon | 137 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Titan65:
1) In my opinion there's no shame in questioning 9/11. Your attitude and candor towards the events are evident that you would blindly accept anything that occurs in front of your face even if there are gaping wounds in the event itself or the theory. Nothing is impossible and for people to question the government whether they allowed the attacks to happen, turned a blind eye on them, or perpetrated the attacks itself is not only acceptable but highly difficult to avoid. There is plenty of viable and reliable revisionist history that points out and uncovers that the government was aware of the Pearl Harbor attacks and offered no warning and little preparation to those that perished in the navy that day. 2) It didn't need to snow in New England for the game to be fixed. In fact, Oakland could have very well won the game but won on a fluky field goal thus saving the NFL and which ever other entities that wanted a team named the Patriots in the Super Bowl. In fact, they spruced up an old rule and switched around the meaning of it following the season in order to give the Pats the victory. Oh, and never mind the fact that the Patriot defensive backs were allowed to manhandle those receivers in the Super Bowl. Don't you recognize coincidences, especially those so conveniently exposed? 3) The Patriots are the obvious choice. Judging by the governments appropriations for homeland security expenditures towards New York City and State, it is obvious no one gives a rip about New York. Don't seem to recall rallying cries involving the blood of giants anywhere, so you know. 4) Houston taking Williams over Bush stinks on many levels, including Charlie Casserly stepping down immediately following the pick. They knew Dominick Davis and their offense was stagnant. Why take a defensive player, especially a young, spotty end who no one had number one (no one reliable) on their draft boards? Don't give me that Mel Kiper bullshit either. 1. As far as the governmet comment, there is only one fact that I don't believe, I think the third plane got shot down and not overrun by the passangers, this was covered up for understandable reasons. Shooting down a passanger jet is not a good move to rally the people. Were they looking for a reason to go to war, I would say so. Did they know it was comming, according to the documets found afterwards, Yes. Did they physically plant bombs in the buildings or shoot a missle into the Pentagon, No, that is ridiculous and its the only part that the conspericy guys hang their hat on. I think it's obvious that we were looking to start a fight and it's a pretty known fact that the government knew it was comming so I dont' think you can call that part a conspericy. I am not a Rep or Dem, I'm a realist. I'm really not sure how you can disprove something that never happened. So many people would have had to been in on it, not just government people, it would have leaked. For christ sakes, we have cell phone footage of Saddam a day after it happened. And to that, Bring the Boys Home
2. There is no way that the refs could think that fast on their feet to pull out a rule that wasn't there in order to let the Pats win. If I remember it correctly, he made a decisive call quickly which tells me that he knew the rule and he just enforced it. I totally disagree with the call but that was the rule. There are rule books and analysts read it right on the air.
3. I don't know how to reply because it's not fixed
4.I agree that Bush is the better player but RB's in this league are a dime a dozen compared to DE. He was a combine freak and that makes the GM's wet. It never equates to making the right pick but you see it every year some guy who runs a fast 40 and can jump over a building, gets drafted high and doesn't amount to much. I won't make my decision for a little bit because 1 year's not enough. Besides many things, the Texans need an offensive line more than a RB.
You are picking out one, one thousanth of the scenerio that has to happen, in order to fix a season.
(Disclaimer on the last SB, that might have been fixed)
|
YaMon | 137 |
|
|
To say the NFL is rigged and the U.S government planned 911 is a joke. First the NFL. Do you relize how many people would have to be in on the so called rigging of the games. This would have to be planned from the beginning of the year with the refs involved and certain players from each team. This thread isn't about rigging certain games but the whole league in order to get these so called teams above into the playoffs. How do you keep this quiet? How do convince million dollar players to follow along with the plan. I assume that everyone that the NFL asks to go along with rigging games didn't say yes. How do you keep them quiet when their in it for a championship that they know they can't win? Can a ref determine the outcome of 1 game. Maybe. Can they determine the outcome every game they wanted to. NO. Could they pay off a QB, sure, Is he going to make millions when his contract expires if he sucks. Nope. Does Grossman not care about his future and is willing to throw a couple games in the first full season he has played instead of playing for a contract? After McNabb went down, they must have really shelled out alot of money to Carolina, Wash, Giants, Cowboys and Atl in order for them to lose and then inturn paid off the Cowboys so the Giants could get in and play the Eagles. Do you think the executives where high fiving after that saying, "that was a close one" In order to get the Cheifs in because it's so important for everyone to see them play the Colts (who cares), they must have shelled out huge bucks. The reason Brees went to the Saints is because he has shoulder surgery and the Chargers had Rivers and had to make a decision. Is it possible they didn't think his shoulder was going to be the same when he came back, with a replacement they thought was viable and not that they paid the Chargers to let him go? Was it a mistake for Houston to take Williams over Bush, probably but they made a stupid decision and good RB's in this league are not exactly hard to come by. It's called mediocrity. Players fumble, QB's throw Int. The teams nowadays are so evenly matched that one break, bad play etc causes a team to lose and we don't have to blame it on rigging. So the NFL made the Patriots win the superbowl because of the name of their team? I could give two sh%ts about the Patriots. How much did it cost the NFL to make it snow in the Pat's/Oak playoff game. Let's get real. And about the US causing 911, you must have watched that documentary online with the scary music and mystery planes landing in Cleveland. As I watched it I admit that I was intriged but there are plenty of sites online that discount that video point by point. It's not up to the government to prove they didn't do it. To even think they would blow up the Pentagon and the Twin Towers is just assanine and impossible to cover it up.Yes IMPOSSIBLE. Too many people would have been involved. Maybe the NFL did it so that the Patriots could win the SuperBowl but why wouldn't it have been the Giants . MLB couldn't even get the Yankees to win the World Series that year right there in NY.
|
YaMon | 137 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.