Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by MyTimeToShine: I'll take Port with the points @ home. Port is solid at home. Vegas knew the public would be all over OKC and they got what they wished for as usual.. With 5 points and a portland team that is good at home...i would disagree and say its not that easy. Don't confuse covers consensus with actual bets (since most people TRY to go opposite of the public). And lastly, with the nfl playoffs looming, this line is not directed towards your average player. and this game will probably see very little action relatively speaking. Don't think too much into what "vegas" is wishing for.... Just some insight i hope you find useful. GL
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lutcher24: i dont normally post but i have been betting games for more than 25 years. this game is a perfect tease. so take ole miss plus 3-4pts and over. double what you normally wager. do the same for the GB Minn game taking GB and over. you will win. dont get greedy just double |
Covers | 82 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by drunkjack: Are you kidding me, nobody else sees this. I've only seen this 3 other times in my life and it's worked everytime. Read the last 10 like a baccarat board and follow the pattern. both teams = the same Vandy U O U O U O U O U O Wolfpack= U U O U U O U U O U. If you don't recognize the sequence in the last 10 is the same and both point to this game being heavy under. This only happens once every 3-4 years, and works every time. 5 star lock While your at the roulette table, why not throw some on black too...its not like their independent events anyway.... |
Covers | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Trailblaza05: If everyone is so confident in TT than why has the spread not changed even when 65% of the public is on TT? 65% of covers consensus does not represent the public
|
Covers | 47 |
|
|
On paper it reads Fresno St. - too bad they also have to play the game on the field.
|
Covers | 82 |
|
|
Does anybody in here actually watch football? Theres nothing fishy about the line, or it dropping.
|
Covers | 63 |
|
|
does BYU and the under seem to easy or is it just me
|
Covers | 57 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dukes_fantasy: still undecided on this but must comment on some other posts..."DR DOG" BYU didnt play with Notre Dame....ND laid an egg like they did 3-4 times this year..BYU got way up for that game & ND didnt show up at all & didnt cover as predicted by every sharp known to man. same thing vs PITT, ND was very over-valued. BYU has a solid D & unimpressive offense. i'm having a tough time with this game but slightly leaning toward SDST. with regards to strength of schedule for any bowl game?! toss those stats/matchups out the window. even without a major coaching change during the weeks leading up to bowl games teams are very different from the last week of regular season. a good example so far this year was Nevada covering vs AZ. like i said...i'm undecided on this game & will read up & look deeper & look beyond regular season points per game & strength of schedule. "SHARK EPREZA" the under isnt a lock & i dont think anyone who bets the over is a "moron" like u posted. u do know the lines that are posted usually try to get action on both sides...so the over/under number released is targeting action on both sides...meaning they refine the number so people have to decide one way or the other...its not a number where smart people can say "omg its too high" the under is the bet...the numbers are almost always the perfect medium to force us into a decision. certain times/situations the number released is way out of whack because ya have a team like ND that the public will jump on no matter what the line is because they are one of americas sweathearts & knowing that the oddsmakers release a line on ND on monday morning that is waaaay to high. so basically if u didnt take pitt or byu vs ND but instead took ND u are some of the people that the oddsmakers bank on in those situations I wasted my time reading this but you are a moron. gooodluck with your wise methods of analysis.
|
Covers | 57 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mikem9: I CANT STAND SCOTT ARIZONA'S QB.HES 120 POUNDS SOAKING WET AND IF IT WASNT FOR ZONAS BIG RECIEVERS{TALL} HE REALLY BE BAD.I NEVER PLAY OVERS CAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW IF A QB OR HB WILL GET HURT AND CHANGE THE WHOLE GAME.BUT AFTER WATCHING ARIZONA PLAY A FEW TIMES THIS YEAR PEOPLE FORGET ZONA HAS A 1700 YARD RUNNING BACK.NEVADA D IS AWFUL.THIS IS ONE EXCEPTION I WILL MAKE .OVER MAYBE EVEN OVER 100 PTS Yea good point, you don't ever play overs because you don't know what's going to happen, or who is going to get injured. That makes a lot of sense. But playing a side is a whole different story right. this guy
|
Covers | 60 |
|
|
IF only being sharp was that easy...Carolina looks to good to be true to me, despite popular opinion
|
Covers | 41 |
|
|
I can't count how many times i got ANDREW F**CKED this season
Still going against the luck... Titans will keep that defense on their heels. And luck will do what he always does in the last two minutes... With that said...gimme the points "If it wasn't for bad luck, id have no luck at all"
|
Covers | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by draw57: LOL are'nt all NBA ov's hit mostly in 4th Q I once hit an under in the middle of the 4th
|
Covers | 41 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.