Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Riccio,
Just wanted to say thanks for the insight and write-up. Always appreciated and taken into account when I'm looking over my card. |
riccio14 | 77 |
|
|
He's playing 2H -3.5
|
LVTruck | 35 |
|
|
Wow, good cover on the over. What a breakdown again by WV. Like two points in 6+ minutes??
|
nropp11 | 107 |
|
|
Changed twice as I was putting my bet in, jumped to 131.5, then 132.5. Any thoughts? I mean I'm sure it's still a play,but smaller?
|
nropp11 | 107 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rlawson: FINAL PLAYS: Dallas vs. New York UNDER 192.0 (2 Units) 1-0, +2.0 Nice run man... I waited till you bet per usual to get the extra .5 ;). Never was close
|
rlawson | 76 |
|
|
Nice loss on Ball State under... LOL...
Love your info, you were saying you wished February hadn't ended, perhaps time to rethink that theory ;). Keep banging em out.
|
nropp11 | 84 |
|
|
Per usual with your early bets Lawson Indy/Chi line is up to 189.5 on my book, thinking about waiting even a little longer and seeing if it doesn't jump up to 190.
|
rlawson | 53 |
|
|
Phew... This is why I don't usually watch my totals bets... lol. Nice call riccio, tailed with you and won. Thanks again as mentioned before. Keep doing your thing.
|
riccio14 | 62 |
|
|
Agreed with first half assessment. I'm just going to let it ride. As long as George Mason comes out early in the 2nd half then we should hit this over. I think they will, so not going to get greedy with U71.5. GL all.
|
riccio14 | 62 |
|
|
Have been quietly following you for awhile riccio. Love your work you put in, and your insight. Just wanted to let you know I appreciate, and have tailed some or used your info to change my mind on a lean. Keep up doing what you do...
That said, crazy first half with George Mason luckily figuring it out some at the end to keep them SOMEWHAT in the game. Thoughts on a middle opportunity here at Under 71.5? Given it's over 20 points off the original line. And if VCU maintains the blowout how long does GM fight for?
|
riccio14 | 62 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor: I listed pacific, northern illinois, and dartmouth as the system plays today Sorry... I worded that poorly... I was saying it didn't look like a play (based on my book having it listed as a conference tourney game, which I now see it doesn't look like it is). Thanks.
|
KineProfessor | 1966 |
|
|
KP... What am I missing with Northern Illinois... Is that not a conference game, and therefore not a system play?
|
KineProfessor | 1966 |
|
|
Just here to say thanks, and congratulate you on the Lakers over with over 4 minutes left in the game, lol. Always nice when they're this "easy". Love your work man, and appreciate it.
|
rlawson | 40 |
|
|
Agreed law, going to ride it out.
|
rlawson | 40 |
|
|
lawson any thoughts on 2nd half 97.5 under? I agree the lakers have regularly had a huge dud quarter... Also if they come out and blow the kings out here, seems likely to go lower(obviously). Seems like almost to good of a first half to try for a middle, just wondering your thoughts.
|
rlawson | 40 |
|
|
where did everyone get canisius +11.5? I only bet with a local book, but lines generally mirror the "consensus". Just wondering as I've been thinking about branching out some. Unfortunately I got 10.5 (it moved from 10 to 10.5) and lost that one, pushed the other as did everyone else it seems(+10).
|
KineProfessor | 1966 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sabermaths: everyone and thier grandmother took under bro. Ummm... No. The line doesn't move from 199.5 to 204.5 with "everyone and thier grandmother" taking the under... bro.
|
penguino | 9 |
|
|
Went 3-0 on system plays, and 2-0 on non system. All three winners were straight up, unreal... You sure the system won't win at as high a clip this year KP? lol. I guess I lucked out as one of the possibles didn't fit at my book (only use a local right now, probably should use others to shop best lines, but like the security of getting paid).
Anyhow I definitely want to echo the sentiment of others, really appreciate all your work, and just everything I've read, seen, and backtested has helped me look at certain games differently for sure.
|
KineProfessor | 1966 |
|
|
Not knocking your play BTW, just a little surprised. I like the under too, just didn't think it would get so high. Let's hope that's a lot of misplaced perception about two big teams on TV. GL.
|
rlawson | 82 |
|
|
Wow, now 204...
|
rlawson | 82 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.