Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by tbeckham: do you follow basketball? road teams are 3-1 in the finals while road teams are 1-3 in the stanley cup. That's a very small sample size. Take the previous rounds. The Blackhawks went on the road and won game 6 in LA. LA returned the favor on the road. The heat were 1 and 2 on the road and 3-0 at home. The spurs were 1 and 2 on the road 3-0 at home. Hawks fan is right. There is no comparison. Home court means way more than home ice. |
tbeckham | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Eight88:
Need to win? Seriously? Heat may win, but it is not because they "need" to... Every team in every sport in playoffs need to win and guess what half of them don't I think what he means, in term is of needing to win, is having a sense of urgency to win. If the heat lose tonight, the series is all but over. If the spurs lose tonight, its 2-2 headed back home. So in that sense, the Head do need this win more than the spurs do. Best of luck with your wagers. |
WOLFPACK3208 | 4 |
|
|
Appreciate your insight.
Nice cash tonight.
|
Leafsinsider | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by daytradernation: You got bigger tits than my wife, now put a shirt on or quit eating ice cream every night.... That wouldn't be the case, if you didn't married that 13 year old.... |
BLangsett | 51 |
|
|
Great nite Vicky
|
vicky98 | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SiuLungBao: your right I probably jinxed this trend and every game from here on out, the spread will matter. GL with your wagers
|
Curry-Goat | 28 |
|
|
I find it interesting the last two rounds, the spread hasn't meant much. Meaning the dog wins outright, no points needed. If the fav wins, they also have covered. Interesting trend. I think maybe one game where the favorite won the game but didn't cover the spread.
|
Curry-Goat | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by prestige33: This line is too high for a reason...It seems to be easy to take Miami ATS... Good luck sir Care to explain this... Game 1 line opens at -3 moves to -5/5.5 by game. Spurs win by 15 and the line opens for game 2 at -4.5. How is that too high ? What should it be -3? -2? Seems spot on IMO
|
LVTruck | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by petergriffin21: This is y u guys lose...typical overreaction...all thunder did was defend home court..spurs win 5 and 7 at home Please tell me how it's an overreaction? The spurs have NOT beat the thunder this year when OKC has a healthy line up. And you can't tell me the last time the spurs blew a 2-0 lead isn't in the back of their minds...
|
AntiVegas | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AntiVegas: Dont care what no one says. They had their way in games 1 and 2 due to the loss of Ibaka. They are a completely different team with him. Anyone who cant see that is remedial..... Game 5 will be very interesting. The spurs will play better but will it be enough? You're absolutely right, with a healthy line up, OKC has owned the spurs ALL season. I do see an athletic team on both ends of the floor. And it's evident that athleticism is causing the spurs all sorts of problems. A key, to me, is Jackson's injury. If he can't go, I don't see Lamb playing so well on the road. GL on your wager.
|
AntiVegas | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing: It basically comes down to if heat wana show up. And thats impossible to cap. If heat want this game they win I personally think the opposite. I believe with LeBron, you will get effort. IMO, it's all about if the pacers show up or not. Are they going to pout every time Miami makes a run? Or are they going to show a little bit of mental fortitude when adversity strikes. They didn't show that in games 3 or 4. Plus it's not like Indiana has been great at home these play offs... Having said that, will vegas really give us 4 straight Miami ATS wins? It has to even out, right? On the other side, in the big 3 era, every time they have been down in a series 1-0, they have come back to win 4 straight and closed it out in 5 games. Might be a good spot to make a 2nd half wager. GL
|
strippersnbens | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by strippersnbens: Heat might not care, knowing they'll take care of business in Miami Or Indiana might not care, knowing they lost the series. The heat have that killer instinct. Indiana doesn't. Good luck with your wager.
|
strippersnbens | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT: No play on OAK! DAMN! I planned on pounding Oakland but now I'll just go light. As a tigers fan, I like oak in this spot. I could be wrong but I'm taking my chances that I won't be.
|
JEFFTHEHAT | 360 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT: I play both, if WAS wins by 1 you win both. Happened 4 times in past couple weeks. Thanks! Good luck.
|
JEFFTHEHAT | 895 |
|
|
The other chase systems you do, you have det, Chicago, Houston all as system 1 plays @+1.5. You also have a rotation play of cinci plus the 1.5.
My question is with these plays...are you playing cinci +1.5 and wash ML? Because this thread has Washington and LAA as series chase. Thanks for the giants play yesterday!
|
JEFFTHEHAT | 895 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by nflcapperletsgo: These are not two series plays on the same series. They are from different series. Care to explain? Under Sunday loot, it has both Miami series and Indiana. Today is Sunday and Miami does play Indiana in a best of 7 series starting today. Maybe these series bets where for the previous round and loot boy forgot to post them... Sometimes loot boy likes to wait until after the game to decide if he played what he posted or if he 'switched.' Loot boy Need a bookie?
|
mikeru3 | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mikeru3: //////Sunday Loooooooooot Train\\\\\\\ *Miami to win Series -Triple Super Duper Grouper Fat Nasty Largo *Indy to win Series -Triple Super Duper Grouper Fat Nasty Largo Good luck fellas! Tip your waitress. Taters gonna tate but I shall keep stacking Fat Nasty Loot checks! Loooooooooooooooot Looooooooooooooooooooooooooot! These two bets just show how much of a moron you're. Not only are you a moron but you can't possibly be taken seriously when you make two bets that guarantee you lose money. Good luck stacking that loooot. Can I be your bookie??
|
mikeru3 | 68 |
|
|
Thanks for the fade.
MIKE You are a LOSER dude!
|
mikeru3 | 54 |
|
|
It's bye bye you illiterate darn.
And you honestly think I give two shits about being banned? The loooooot train will be derailed soon enough. |
mikeru3 | 27 |
|
|
Ok nets +1 is the play! Thanks for posting before tin. But
will you be playing the 'opposite' of what you posted again after you lose?
|
mikeru3 | 27 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.