Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"All the evidence points to more likely than not. You would have to be a dolt or an ostrich to believe otherwise."
I tend to think Pac has not roided. Excepting some HGH during his move up in weight perhaps. So...what is all the evidence that points towards chemical abuse? |
Mack05 | 29 |
|
||||
Manny is not a true 147lb fighter. Anyway I would be very surprised if Floyd loses to Shane. |
fighting-mma | 7 |
|
||||
I'm on Cobra & fatboy.
At least one of these dogs will hit. |
LarryParker | 14 |
|
||||
Didn't someone around here say he was a fully certified nut?
|
NJDevils | 9 |
|
||||
The books want people to keep betting on the event and if the event is cancelled, they get to hold the money for 3(?) months. They figure this will encourage more deposits. And if the event is rescheduled within 3 months of the original date, you don't get to reschedule your bet even though the venue, weightclass, gloves, sanctioning body etc could have changed. Concerning the drugs, well, I have a very average knowledge of Performance Enhancing drugs but the general understanding is that any drugs used will test positive the day after the event anyway. If that's the case, then I think Floyd deserves his new nickname, Kentucky Floyd Mayweather.
|
juan110470 | 39 |
|
||||
Karmazin at -330ish means Miranda (by TKO?) or no Bet.
|
EricLinny | 22 |
|
||||
Yeah, a fair bit of banging on Manny's refusal to test olympic style because they see it as a very easy step for him to do. They don't all take into consideration the element of dignity. Consider if Floyd were offered big money to star in a KFC commercial where he says "Mmm...the best chicken in town" Now if Manny concedes to a special testing proceedure that other boxers do not have to do, doesn't that appear to highlight or admit to something? Also, how did gridironguy insert that photo of Arum on his other post? |
Mack05 | 33 |
|
||||
Some of you people don't seem to have any insight into the refusal. Manny is indignant that at being accused of cheating when he believes there was no evidence of suspicion. This is not an olympic games contest and other professional boxers have not been required to undergo any unusual tests so why should he this time? If he were to admit to the special tests wouldn't he be admitting that his previous two bouts looked suspicious? Indignant. If you don't know what that word means, google it up.
Etymology From Latin indignans, ppr. of indignari (“‘to consider as unworthy, be angry or displeased at’”) < in- (“‘privative’”) + dignari (“‘to consider as worthy’”) < dignus (“‘worthy’”). [edit] Adjectiveindignant (comparative more indignant, superlative most indignant)
[edit] Synonyms |
juan110470 | 39 |
|
||||
I'm not saying you can't speak/write English like a native speaker but the grammar could be polished a little. "Manny Pacquiao as humble as he is, has enormous ego too, and by the way Floyd Mayweather is acting would a Manny Pacquiao just say yes to what ever Floyd Mayweather says?" Legible text, just not "Professional journalist" standard yet. |
tOOT3r | 7 |
|
||||
Bah don't be silly. Cotto will drag his career beyond two fights because he will still be making more money than he would doint anything else. He might not become the next Hollyfield but he will fight on. Cotto v Pacman II will never happen as there is no public interest in it after that lopsided bashing. I can't believe Pacman will fight Mayweather at 147 as he demanded 145 from Cotto. Unbelievable madness. |
juan110470 | 34 |
|
||||
More dramatic for the Pacman legend.... wins by TKO |
Mack05 | 156 |
|
||||
Official stop time? Did the over 11.5 hit? |
Mack05 | 156 |
|
||||
So if this goes to the judges, who thinks Cotto gets treat fairly? I think it is likely not so. Cotto was pressured to put up his 147lb belt for a 145lb fight. Everyone WANTS the belt to change hands and to see history unfold as the little guy does it in seven divisions. The judges know what is supposed to happen. |
waves | 43 |
|
||||
Cotto might do it but it can't be a great great bet as I see a gift decision for Pacman as a very likely scenario. The best thing that could happen for Cotto's career here is that he loses a controversial decision. Then, he can push for a rematch for another huge payday.
|
waves | 43 |
|
||||
Smart money on the Giant but after watching more video I swing to Haye. The Giant has a poor punch output, lacks the killing instinct, has undeadly flurries, is unable to fight on the inside. So... even if Haye punches himself out early failing to hurt the Russian, he won't find it hard to survive to the finish. |
TennisCapper | 27 |
|
||||
"This is the easiest 2:1 fave i've seen in a while. "
You must be mad. There is a jolly good chance the Beast from the East takes this one. Remember, at heavyweight, Haye is muscled up and this detracts from late stamina. If he doesn't hurt his opponent early, he could be fading late, moving around and losing the last 4 rounds. He will find it hard to hurt the Russian. |
TennisCapper | 27 |
|
||||
Bring back the old art style to your website.
And then you'll start winning money again... Otherwise you'll just keeping jinxing fight results with your karma |
fighting-mma | 5 |
|
||||
Fighting-Mma, Shogun is stylistically a bad choice to beat Machida. I once, in a different forum asked you to change the artwork style of your website back to the original style and you didn't. So now, your karma will be to lose money on this fight. Tsk Tsk. Rothwell, even Yoshida are more likely dogs to come up trumps |
fighting-mma | 22 |
|
||||
Oh come on Mack05, this sort of claim should come after a weekend that includes dog picks.
This weekend, you picked two favourites, one of them won a shady hometowner. |
Mack05 | 43 |
|
||||
Its only in certain countries homecooking is strong...
Froch is white and English, they'll want him to win, it would be best for the boxing coffers |
Mack05 | 12 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.