Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
wasnt "because they suck" your reasoning for betting against UW-M earlier.....how'd that work out??
|
mikeru3 | 21 |
|
|
Seeing a lot of different info out there is he's gonna play tonight at Portland. Anyone one have anything solid if he's in our out?
|
BoughtTheHook | 6 |
|
|
Hey si1ly, Where do you get those team rankings? |
si1ly | 124 |
|
|
Hate the idea of this heavy juice, but are there any Mavs fans out there that have an opinion on this prop bet? Game 1 he had 17, but his stats (and minutes) seem to be inconsistant. Thoughts? |
BoughtTheHook | 1 |
|
|
All of those games mentioned earlier didn't come on the third leg of a 3 game - 4 night stretch. Any worry that their stamina / nerves catch up to um in this one? |
jesron1269 | 7 |
|
|
Miami (OH) leading scorer, rebounder, and assist man Julian Mavunga listed as Questionable with a heel injury? Anyone with any info if he's playing tonight, please share. |
Covers | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sloop703:
... but when you compare them to EFFICIENCY numbers, they still show that Pacific is awful offensively. Just going to throw out that Pacific is #260 overall defense, #209 effective FG% defense, #225 3pt% defense. Just to be fair Cal St's defensive numbers are worse. #276 overall defense, #264 effective FG% Defense, and #323 3pt% defense. Not saying Cal St doesn't win and cover, but they're defense is bad. Not to mention they allowed Pacific's "aweful" offense to score 73 points, shoot 47%, and outgain them on the offensive glass in Cal St.'s gym. |
sloop703 | 54 |
|
|
No way Weber St. continues to stay cold at home. only shot 29%?! Montana St. starters have 5 combined points. Weber St strong 2nd. |
BoughtTheHook | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by chensucht:
Northern Arizona is strong at home. Take the points! I dont think so. 4-1 at home this year. 2 wins coming against non-d1 teams. The other two strong wins were vs teams outside the top #250. the only team theyve played at home in the top #260 was #251 Pepperdine. They lost by 9. Montana > Pepperdine. |
Covers | 4 |
|
|
Eastern Washington fouls more than any other team in the country. While Montana St isn't shooting lights out FT% they do get the line a lot. Couple that with terrible defense from Montana St. and two teams with tempos above leauge average and i like OVER 139 in this game. |
BoughtTheHook | 1 |
|
|
Kenpom has FW losing by 16! what makes you like them tonight?
|
scsiegel89 | 7 |
|
|
Great Post....GL tonight.
|
duanedibley | 23 |
|
|
First road game, but students all home for break. Not sure the locals that'll be there are as intimidating as the ORANGE CRUSH. But gimme Illinois - 5.5 in this one as well to start conference play with a W and a cover....GL |
TBallgame | 3 |
|
|
Mizzu #325 SOS has inflated a lot of their numbers offensively. I think Illinois (#264 tempo) eats clock and Leonard gets some offensive boards to eat up more clock. Illinois only averages 8 TO per game and a lot of Mizzu points come fast break from a turnover. Leonard and the Illini are top 15 in blocked shots. Illinois isn't a good FT shooting team. I like UNDER 140.5 in this one, but have been wrong before.... GL to ALL...unless you have the over
|
robbypark | 60 |
|
|
Injury report lists Rice's leading rebounder and scorer, Kazemi, as probable after suffering a head injury saturday. Seems like head injuries are looked at a lot closer these days. Anybody know if he's in or out as a precaution?
|
sloop703 | 24 |
|
|
Rider gave up 95 points to MARIST (rank #264) and lost by 20! Gimme over 154. Florida has put up big numbers against weak competition. Next game isnt't until 12/17 which means there's no reason to "rest" the starters too early in this one. If Florida hits 90 points this game goes over. GL to all. |
bware | 21 |
|
|
Looking at that over. SC had 2 weeks to game plan, low total number, Tenn Over has hit 12 of last 17 home games, and after playing LSU & Bama last two weeks, Tenn gets a break with SC's D. Both teams have been ugly on offense at times, but I think this number is reachable. Thoughts??
|
TDHAWKS | 8 |
|
|
Love betting College Ball. Tons of games every day of the week to find an angle that you believe gives you that edge. Lots of mismatches in talent, size, experience..etc that can give you that edge. Sounds like you were looking for some "easy money" and just tailed other people's opinoins.
|
seaweed | 17 |
|
|
You beat me to it...... 12-2 run last 4:05 for the heat, Held Charoltte to 15 2nd quarter points, James starting to find his shots..... HEAT -5 2nd Half
|
JMTRAN | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by YACKER:
Locked in play: Providence -8 (2 units) The Friars enter their game with Northeastern at 6-1 and 5-0 at home this year. They haven't played a great schedule so far and LaSalle handed to them pretty good on a neutral floor last week. Kenpom has them game at Providence -11 which made me take a longer look. The line opened at 6.5 and has moved to 8 in a lot of places. This Providence team has outrebounded their opponents by more than 10 per game and that is including getting outrebounded badly by LaSalle. Northeastern is at a size disadvantage here and that won't bode well for them and second chance points. Northeastern has shot the 3 well this year (40%, 39 in NCAA) but they face the 14th ranked 3 point defense tonight. Northeastern shoots better from the 3 line than they do from the field overall. Even though Providence doesn't shoot the long ball well they do shoot almost 45% from the field. Providence will pull away from Northeastern as the game goes on and cover the 8. Northeastern is ranked 285th in the nation in rebounding at 32.5 rpg while Providence is ranked 22nd at 42.1 rpg! Big difference there. Providence -8 looks solid. GL |
YACKER | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.