Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Lamello is too reckless...when he is off he looks bad probably because he has the ugliest shot in the league...Also does not play D... He constantly is looking for the highlight play instead of the easy play. And jacks 35 foot jumpers at the worst time. But all that is Charlotte's fault I guess. |
yorosan | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Schyzyz:
@jepjep02 Yeah.. same with bkn with no starters.. phonix will win this easily
Good call. |
CrazyMilkMan | 11 |
|
|
So this bet is knowing no Booker? Line is now -4. Either way GL |
CrazyMilkMan | 11 |
|
|
@davemsh
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
@Aalon Knicks would give up 3 1st at the minimum to get Zion.. he is can sign an extension this summer with Pelicans and sign and trade. Knicks are starving for a star player attraction. Pels still have more 1sts coming from the Lakers, including a top 8 pick this year, then more 1sts coming from the Bucks starting in 2025. They already have a young team. If the Knicks need a star player that's their problem.
Again, they have NO REASON to trade Zion, and Zion has no leverage to force a trade even if he wanted to. His step dad already said he's happy where he is.
Stop listening to the schmucks on radio and tv. Zion will be a Pelican for the forseable future. |
Themachine11 | 15 |
|
|
@davemsh
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
The pelicans future looks bright.. they may very well trade Zion and get a haul of picks and or players.. then they own the Fakers lottery draft pick in this years draft and another future 1st. BI.. Zion..CJ.. Herbert Jones..Valacunius.. next year. Plus a deep bench and high draft picks..Wowzer
They have no reason whatsoever to trade Zion. You can't get a haul for a player still on his rookie deal anyway. |
Themachine11 | 15 |
|
|
BI+CJ+Jonas vs CP3+Ayton+...Bridges?? |
ercem | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Themachine11:
Without him, this team is full of clowns...
CJ McCollum is a clown? All-NBA defense rookie Herb Jones is a clown? Jonas Valaciunas is a clown? wierdo |
smokin376 | 7 |
|
|
@warrenator
Quote Originally Posted by warrenator:
Looks like the lucky boobs will finally win, against a sub-.500 club with James getting 60 points, 30 at the free throw line
That sub .500 record is deceiving. They are now 31 - 27 since late november with the 10th rated defense and 13th rated offense. They are now 25-15 when Brandon Ingram plays in that time frame. They are now 7 - 1 with their current starting lineup. Which is why is was a very bad idea to bet on the LOL lakers this game. Keep this stuff in mind when betting pellie games. |
Bullsrule | 56 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ScriptedTheater:
I posted on here yesterday that if the NBA wants a race for the 10th seed, they will have SA beat Nola and then the next day the Pelicans will beat the Lakers... That is exactly what happened..
This has nothing to do with the NBA. Brandon Ingram didnt play against the Spurs and the the Spurs squeaked it out. Out of the western seeds 7 - 11, the Pelicans have consistently been the best team since November of the bunch. And that's including lots of injury problems, distractions (espn trying to get zion out of there) and big trades at the deadline. |
Moku_weena | 14 |
|
|
@MrBator
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Quote Originally Posted by yorosan: The league need lbj to get the 8th seed…public not gonna care suns vs pels/clips But Lakers/Suns will be a 4-game sweep. The league doesn't want 4-game sweeps. Wait, Pelicans/Suns will also be a 4-game sweep. Oh, and Clippers/Suns, too. Okay, never mind.
Pelicans/Suns would absolutely not be a 4 game sweep if Brandon Ingram plays. He's missed too many games this year. With him Pels are actually strong. Which is why this bet was lost. Worrying about if Lebron was available but totally missed Brandon Ingram coming back after missing the last 10. Anyways good luck going forward. |
Themachine11 | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bigvern1013:
Quote Originally Posted by weneverlose: You can have Burrow, I'll take Lawrence. Burrow's had a great year, but Lawrence has never lost as a starter. There's a lot to be said for perfection.I disagree.Burrow > Lawrence (but close)Etienne > Edwards-HelaireJefferson > HigginsJamarr Chase > RossMarshall > RodgersMoss > Chalk
If you look at the numbers alone, saying Burrow had a great year is a vast understatement. His year is astronomical. He literally doubles Lawrence in every metric. |
weneverlose | 43 |
|
|
Seems like so many underestimate LSU, and I just don't know why. This is a once in a lifetime type team |
shirley-jester | 22 |
|
|
Pretty? |
snowman76 | 39 |
|
|
replied to
49ers suspend their TV analyst for stating the obvious...or was it racist?
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
I call b*llsheet! I'm real tired of this political correctness movement. Yeah everybody says that...until its something directed at them or people that look like them. Then the sheets of snow will flow from your own mouth. |
begginerboy | 71 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Alexg85:
Saints were bad at winning opening games too. New contracts and a clock ticking for Drew Brees can push change. Their time to win is now, and also Brees is chasing a TD record. Honestly idk how the Saints do so good with just 2 offensive players basically, and a backup RB chiming in. But somehow they do. But, the 150 rushing yards given up is scary. I'm feeling it's a Rams win and the Saints will have to claw their way back into the playoffs So Brees, Kamara, Thomas, Ginn, Cook, and arguably the best offensive line in football is basically two offensive players? How? |
EastsideBangers | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gutinstinctus:
These "revenge" storylines never work unless they are backed up by facts. Fact: The Rams are a much superior offense than the Texans especially running. Gurley anhilates Hyde or Johnson. Fact: Carlos Hyde and Duke Johnson dominated New Orleans yesterday. For some strange reason the Texans tried only 19 rush attempts, even though they were averaging more than 7 yards per carry. Unbelievable! Fact: Drew Brees is WAY worse away than at home. Fact: Lattimore has regressed since the 2nd half of last season. Cooks, Woods and Cupp are a at least on the same level than Hopkins, Fuller and Stills. I don`t know Rick, sounds like you are on the wrong side of this game.
Unless you can be objective or disclose actual facts, fandom has no place on a betting board. |
EastsideBangers | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Play4daBucks:
Please give us a write-up on the Rams!! Dude loves the Rams and has been chalking them all year. Dude does not like the Saints and has been fading them all year. Has tried using arguments with half cocked, poorly justified stats as receipts. Called for the Rams to win large against the Saints back in week 9. Obviously, that did not happen. So, I'd wager it's gonna take some time searching the trash bin trying to justify the Rams covering this time around. Not an easy write up for someone continuously fading the Saints. |
LeagueCapper | 202 |
|
|
"St Louis Rams. What a team. What a season. They will not be beaten twice in the same season. Just too damn good to happen." You at least need to get the city right to be taken seriously. And about that LOS ANGELES team and their season? They lost to those Eagles. The Saints just beat those same Eagles...in a revenge game no less. |
VGPOP | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller:
TIN FOIL HATS unite this one is tops for posting meaningless inormation you obiously missed the fact that sainst at home lately are not strong at all have gone 1 -4 ATS last 5 yea yea i know they didnt play vs Panthers but how do u allow a 1st time qb who never played in any game or took a snap to blow you out at home 33-14??? YOU mean to tell me your 2nd string is that bad?Also again adding the Vegas fuugg job making saints an 8 point fav.i maen if losing 14-4 @ tampa bay and 14-0 vs eagles dosent throw up redflags for you then your blind also two more home games they were losing for 3 quaters squeaked out 3 point wins THe Browns omfg and steelers Drew brees is worn out cannot make plays downfield any more and the double backs of rams CJ anderson with Gurley will run all over that saints lethargic defense,I also am a fan of drew Brees but i have a theory that NFL dosent want saints ever to be in a superbowl do to the bounty gate years which caused Sean peyton to be removed as HC for a year. The Browns ended up pretty good this year no? The Bucs had the #1 offense most of the season, not the Chiefs. And the Saints "squeaked" out a win against the Eagles and were down 14-0. But what did the Rams do? They were down 30-13 to that same Eagles team and LOST. Shut up dumbass. |
Hublot | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:
KC coaching is much better than LAC's, not sure there's a big advantage for Patriots in that department this time. Rams & Saints have a similar level of coaching? I like what I've seen from Sean Mcvay for the most part. Maybe even advantage Rams? McVay is not on Sean Payton's level friend. Not enough experience. Plus the Saints have a damn good coaching staff. Mike Nolan is on the defenseive staff and Deniis Allen is no slouch. Little known fact...Saints are #2 in the league in holding teams to 20 points or less. I'm just not convinced Wade Phillips suddenly turned that shit defense of his around after one game against a very pedestrian Dallas offense. |
NinjaNight | 76 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.