Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I used your info a lot for majors. 3rd and 4th round match-ups seem a lot more successful for me as well than 1st and 2nd round. |
AJLightning | 42 |
|
|
AJ - Happy New Year amigo!
I have been reading your posts for a couple years now, and was wondering if you kept your overall record last year, and if so what was it? Best of luck this year. My picks: To Win: Ogilvy 35-1, Walker 14-1, Kirk 16-1, Henley 38-1, Stallings 52-1. Jumping on your turney match ups on Henley (+105) vs Clark, Ogilvy (-105) vs Bae. |
AJLightning | 42 |
|
|
replied to
Saturday March 8th: Being the best ever isnt as hard as you would think.
in College Basketball
Thoughts on Tenn Train??? Seems like Mizzou is the biggest trap bet of year.
|
TRAIN69 | 106 |
|
|
Big game for Mizzou. Horrible road team, but could be an early "must win" for them. Value play, could easily come down to last possession. I wouldnt play ML, but +5 is nice.
|
Degen4Ever | 12 |
|
|
That is rushing D I was referencing. I almost think the opposite will happen, Iowa can run the hell out of the ball.
|
Retief63376 | 16 |
|
|
In a conference that can't do anything on offense but run, Iowa's D is 4th, and 21st in the country. I don't know if their throats will be open.
|
Retief63376 | 16 |
|
|
Anther question, So is Vegas stating that if both starting QBs were playing they would be 10-14 point favs? More and more I think about this, I'm thinking books are trying to taking advantage of uninformed public, and SEC hype. I think I just reversed my picks.
|
Retief63376 | 16 |
|
|
Exactly, That was with Mettenburger though. Now reports that DL Ego Ferguson didnt make trip. I'm puzzled on this line. Hate betting on Big Ten, especially against SEC, but Ferentz has had success.
|
Retief63376 | 16 |
|
|
Any thoughts? I'm leaning on laying on both. Nebraska has beaten no one, and looked bad doing it. Iowa looked beater beating no one, LMFAO.
|
Retief63376 | 16 |
|
|
replied to
***Macwesties Thurs. Jan. 01, 2014 * NCAAF *GATOR & CAPITOL ONE * College Games***
in College Football
Interesting 2 Big Ten over SEC. I hate when you make me 2nd guess myself...
|
Macwestie1 | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tedwalsh7: Pittsburgh at Bowling Green
PIT 21.1 BG 41.9
DIFF 20.8 BG -5.. / ML PLAY ALSO Take team names out of the equation. Why if you think a team is 20.8 points better and the line is -5, why on earth would you risk $ on the money line? Bad money management there. |
tedwalsh7 | 28 |
|
|
Since Osirus would break down the schedules, I will help him out...
After this week, Mizzou will have played the best opponent in Auburn vs Clemson, or Mich St for that matter. Strength of schedule (which is going into this week, and will only go up further for Mizzou than the other 2 schools) is Miz - 24th, Fla st - 42nd, OH ST - 52nd. Lets dig deeper... at the time each school played their opponents, Mizzou played 6 ranked teams, FSU 4, and OHST 3. It's not Mizzou's fault that they beat down every team they played by double digits, except for TxAM, thus costing their opponents to fall in their respective rankings. Lets look at... I can go on and on in this conversation. However, I can't fix stupid. I'm not stating Mizzou is going to beat FSU or OHST, IF (big IF) they even get to play. But what I am saying, is that Mizzou would have had a better chance at being undefeated with the weaker schedules of Fla St or Ohio St. And Ohio St and Fla St would have had a harder time being undefeated as they did with current schedules. To take anything away from Mizzou based upon their schedule is ridiculous. And shows that you are biased for a school, or blinded by Mizzou's success just like every better who bet against Mizzou this year (except the SC game. 10-1-1 ATS speaks for itself). Can you point out somehow |
Osirus13 | 16 |
|
|
|
TRAIN69 | 20 |
|
|
VD- Slu has two common opponents as Wisconsin, And beat them by more points and held them to less. Both were at home for Wisky and Slu too. Food for thought, GL today.
|
Retief63376 | 14 |
|
|
Any reason why Pix? Wisky struggles with big men, Slu has 2 good ones. Wisky hasn't faced D like this all year. And Slu makes FTs. All good things in a low scoring game.
|
Retief63376 | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PeteJohns98: I know, try these guys too, they are pretty good: https://www.AllStarSportsPicks.com/ Troll. How does this guy get 77 posts? And who would pay for picks? |
Retief63376 | 14 |
|
|
Had over in the Zags game last night and got very lucky in 2nd half. GL with totals!
SLU line up to +2.5 at my book, come on public, keep pushing it up! |
Retief63376 | 14 |
|
|
No worries. Like I said, I knew I was missing something. Any leans today?
|
Kramer323 | 115 |
|
|
Chaminade up to 22.5 already, might wait on this one to game time too.
|
Retief63376 | 14 |
|
|
0-0 in college Bball. Don't post many plays, just wanted a convo going on these.
Minny - 4.5 - Looked like a much better D team, and control boards a lot better. Just ran into foul trouble (like all other losers in Hawaii yesterday LMAO) Chaminade +21.5 - Feels like a let down spot for Zags. Chaminade can score, and always competitive in this turney. Small degen play. Slu +1.5 - Something doesn't smell right here. A top 10 team laying only 1.5??? Slu plays amazing D, and owns the boards. Should be a low scoring game, and give me the team with the points that can make free throws. Medium to big play, waiting for line to move, will take at pick, but can see it going to 3 - 3.5 before game starts. Thoughts welcome, and lets break the book! |
Retief63376 | 14 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.