Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@GTD still a buy stock
|
GTD | 3 |
|
|
i will FADE the line move here and take RoughRiders +1. if Riders cover likely this game goes UNDER. |
CFLChef | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE: too many points to lay in week 1 on the road with a track team not knowing what field conditions will be on natural surface. Falcons likely win SU but the spread to me looks more 50/50 at this point in time. i'd be looking to fade the ticket count at kickoff on this one.
forget this game and take Falcons -7 in Chicago.....This will be a blowout of epic proportions. |
ToddC | 14 |
|
|
when O'Brien got there they had Case Keenum, Thad Lewis and Tom Savage. i would say they have overachieved making the playoffs 2 of 3 seasons under O'Brien with no legit QB. as far as the draft picks go i'd feel comfortable making a lay bet that for the next 5 seasons the Browns will continue having a less then 50% win record each season. legit desirable free agents don't want to live there and when rookie contracts expire players leave if any team wants them.
|
davemsh | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Wess_Tijuana: i was curious so i looked up - Previous head 2 head meeting committing 6 or more turnovers, next meeting month of September as Away Dog 12-4-1 ATS with the average line being +5.9 i would still try to get +6 or more in-game if nothing else but to win the battle of getting the better line.
In their blowout loss at Green Bay near the end of last season, Seattle actually outgained the Packers, led in time of possession, and picked up more first downs However, it is difficult at any level to compete effectively when losing the turnover battle 6-0 6-0 !! Earl Thomas will be back in Centerfield for this one; last year at Green Bay was the first game for the Seahawks without him after he broke his leg during a 40-7 blowout of Carolina the week prior This line will push to 3.5 I am sure Green Bay will not win the turnover battle 6-0 this time around Bottom line, the Seahawks this September will be much closer to the version that took the field in Foxboro against the full-strength Patriots last year in mid November ...A game, of course, that the Seahawks won by 7 I see real value here on Seattle |
ToddC | 14 |
|
|
double revenge on the road not that strong in my opinion. Seahawks won 3 straight in the head 2 head before obtaining this double revenge scenario. my line is Packers -2.5 making this a PASS on betting game. 2 quality teams with a good line. i would possibly play Seahawks if getting +6 or more in-game.
|
ToddC | 14 |
|
|
Eastern Time Zone teams as Home Dog(Colts) vs a West Coast team(Seahawks) on the 2nd of back2back Road Games are 16-4-1 ATS last 10 years.
Colts are 15-3 ATS at Home off back2back Road Games(week 3 @ 49ers, week 4 @ Jaguars) last 10 years. Andrew Luck is 4-0 ATS as a Home Dog. |
Covers | 57 |
|
|
Michigan 34 Alabama 13 i should warn all... i am really high right now..... |
Covers | 46 |
|
|
Michigan 34 Alabama 13 i should warn all... i am really high right now..... |
Covers | 46 |
|
|
this game definately has more meaning for the Saints. IMO they will look to send a message to the League that they do not intend to lay down and rest so easily. however, i see them goin' 5-11 in the reg. season. NOR -3 |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
odd trend i know, but Road Favs off a Home Fav SUATS loss are 2-10 ATS last 5 years. Fade BC. CAL +1 |
canadianice | 7 |
|
|
trends are a great resource for identifying coaches/teams personalities. marc's playbook can give you a hint of what you really want to look for. dont ignore trends, but dont automatically bet on them. the real key to success is discipline. dont get greedy. marc's book is a good information sources for stats and past results when your on the go. i would recommend phil steele's college football preview for sure.
|
Daddy_Freddie | 7 |
|
|
oh, also Edmonton now 2-8 ATS as a Road Fav since '07.
|
popthebook | 6 |
|
|
Winnipeg now an amazing 11-8 SU and 14-4-1 ATS as a Home Dog since '07
|
popthebook | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Powerz: thanx for the contribution Powerz. we will make good money in this thread. im still waiting to see the week 1 lines, but we can assume the value is in the dogs. week 1 Dogs are 13-6-1 SU and 17-3 ATS last 5 yrs.
Also Meant to say good thread Home favs from 1-3 were 9 ATS with 4 SU losses Last year
Home favs from -4 to -9.5 were 7 Wins Ats - 4 Wins no Cover - 12 SU losses last year |
chopperocker | 18 |
|
|
teams off a Home Fav SU loss are 2-10 ATS as a Road Fav.
|
chopperocker | 18 |
|
|
teams of a Road Dog Straight-Up win are 21-11 ATS as a Home/Road Dog and 12-5 Straight-Up as a Home Dog in theyre next game.
|
chopperocker | 18 |
|
|
Over 179
|
Covers | 21 |
|
|
anybody seen a price yet?
|
osc239 | 51 |
|
|
rethink that thought.
|
Toddo66 | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.