Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Does anyone have an ideas for sports related investments? |
brownbull | 2 |
|
|
I don't bet these futures bets with juice but if I did, strong plays on Chargers over 9 and Cardinals over 5.5. Texans should be solid and I'm not buying the 49ers just yet.
|
LB_Dirtbags | 18 |
|
|
Rip off. I hope you didn't give the lawyer a penny.
Also, the Daily Fantasy thing is dying a slow death. Hundreds of millions of (investment) dollars have been squandered on it.
|
smartapple123 | 9 |
|
|
It's not 100% but it has been making me money for years and from reading this thread I am pretty confident it still works.
The majority of forum posters that are too lazy to capitalize the first letter of a sentence DO NOT make good handicappers. Whatever the connection is, there is without a doubt a connection. good luck to all of you. mcgregor has a chance! ha ah
|
smartapple123 | 12 |
|
|
Where did these come from? Thanks for posting but I see the Saints #9 & the Giants way down at #18. Odd.
|
strippersnbens | 5 |
|
|
No, it's true. It's not losers crying.
The play calling when they were up 10 & 3 points was pathetic. FYI, I had some Clem ML $ but still feel like I got a gift. Both by Bama play calling and no call on the illegal pick on game winning td. Game rightly should have gone to OT.
|
mbialowas | 63 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: Pre mature whistle, that was a fumble I have watched this multiple times and from the angle we have you can't tell if his knee was down or not. But forward progress? Huh? The only reason he called that is so they could not review it. If that was forward progress than what about a couple dozen plays in every game every weekend? We've all watched enough football to say that it was ridiculous.
|
undermysac | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: Did the replay not show the ball go about 10 yards forward? Sorry I have no play on the game just observing. No complaints here. Enjoy the rest of the game. Yes. The ball definitely went forward quite a bit because it was a throw. The officiating has been a complete joke.
|
undermysac | 13 |
|
|
replied to
Cowgirls are getting all the calls- Obvious NFL wants them in the Super Bowl
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Jrod6: I agree but who cares just load up and cash on them, last year was panthers this year it's the girls True. They have been getting calls all year. Tonight was obnoxious. Time to just keep betting them to win and not sweat it. It's still BS how biased the officiating is in their games but it's not like anything will change.
|
Crashdavis565 | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Polar_Bear: By the way in all the games so far the teams with the most players demonstrating for lack of a better word, are the teams winning the games beginning on thursday when marshalls broncos won and the patriots with fists in the air, seahawks and so on..... Virtually the last play of the game too. Missed FGs, etc.
|
Achilles1629 | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1: I love his knowledge , insight and wisdom of the game on Monday night countdown but I cannot bear to listen to him as a play by play announcer .......terrible I agree 100%. You guys beat me to it. Terrible broadcast tonight.Hard to hear & understand them. I like them both in their usual roles but not in the booth. This is painful.
|
Alien-1 | 19 |
|
|
replied to
Omg. Betonline has the superbowl champions Denver Broncos at +100 to make the playoffs
in NFL Betting
Correction; money "held"
|
Ilost20grand | 28 |
|
|
replied to
Omg. Betonline has the superbowl champions Denver Broncos at +100 to make the playoffs
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Ilost20grand: I think that there is no max for future props. the more money someone puts in for a future prop the more interest on money the business makes. plus more future props are keen to loosing due to injuries and stuff like that There is usually a fairly low limit on futures bets. They are more concerned with getting crushed if the wrong team wins than earning interest on the money help over the months. Once you make your max limit bet, they will either readjust the odds or leave them as is depending what their liability is on that team. Maybe could use more action on a particular team and will gladly allow you to bet more at the same odds. I am sure someone on here could recommend a place that allows more but everywhere I have bet had futures limits like $300, $500, $1000.
|
Ilost20grand | 28 |
|
|
Thorpe is 100% correct.
|
Dbreezyy | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dl36: I don't have access to this, but interested to know what the odds are on this Sportsbook.ag currently has +250 on the prop for Trump to release his tax returns prior to the election.
|
mainman11111 | 11 |
|
|
The Draymond foul (that wasn't called) that made Westbrook lose the ball at the end when the score was 104-101 should have been his sixth. I did think a call or two against Draymond were suspect but how many others did he get away with?
|
GamblingSkeptic | 43 |
|
|
They were laughing at the question. It was obvious. The question was ridiculous. If they were laughing at Curry or acting like punks I would be the first to criticize them. This was not the case.
|
begginerboy | 20 |
|
|
Durant clearly stunk it up but you can't say no help from refs. What a joke. Glad I laid off OKC and only bet prop bets. This is the kind of game I used to pound OKC on. I've learned how it often works after too many years of watching the joke NBA.
|
cedandhisbro | 4 |
|
|
Klay was incredible...but a giant part of that was Roberson on the bench with five fouls. Roberson can at least contain him so he doesn't go off like that.
|
cedandhisbro | 4 |
|
|
I just saw the replay. Clearly Curry. NO DOUBT. Also, Green should have been fouled out for slapping Westbrook's arm prior to that.
|
LancerPX | 17 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.