Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, knows what the informed people in America already knew..
He suggested the U.S. President's Nowruz message "included dishonest assertions ( lies) and his claim of friendship for Iranian people was not sincere,"
..and Iran's Supreme Leader should be able to ID a liar . because it take one to know one..Iran denies it has ever sought nuclear weapons.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, knows what the informed people in America already knew..
He suggested the U.S. President's Nowruz message "included dishonest assertions ( lies) and his claim of friendship for Iranian people was not sincere,"
..and Iran's Supreme Leader should be able to ID a liar . because it take one to know one..Iran denies it has ever sought nuclear weapons.
I will have to agree with Don Fredo on the job Obama is doing on foreign policy .. it's another remarkable job..
Obama ignores the overwhelming public opinion of the American people ....When close to 80% of Americans believe Iran's development of nuclear weapons posed a "critical threat" to the United States...and over 70% believe a deal would not prevent the Iranians from obtaining a nuclear weapon...Obama is overriding the majority of Americans concerns and trying to make a bad deal with Iran. anyway ..
So why is President Obama obsessed with making a bad deal with Iran?
Is because... after he did a another remarkable job of creating a vacuum in Iraq.....Iran has accepted Obama's outsourcing of the fight against ISIS in Iraq to them? ( who ,if victorious will be the one's to fill that vacuum.)..
Remarkable foreign policy job ..Mr.Obama.. yes indeed! Remarkable...
Obama to Iran "lets make a deal....Iran to Obama "death to America"...
I will have to agree with Don Fredo on the job Obama is doing on foreign policy .. it's another remarkable job..
Obama ignores the overwhelming public opinion of the American people ....When close to 80% of Americans believe Iran's development of nuclear weapons posed a "critical threat" to the United States...and over 70% believe a deal would not prevent the Iranians from obtaining a nuclear weapon...Obama is overriding the majority of Americans concerns and trying to make a bad deal with Iran. anyway ..
So why is President Obama obsessed with making a bad deal with Iran?
Is because... after he did a another remarkable job of creating a vacuum in Iraq.....Iran has accepted Obama's outsourcing of the fight against ISIS in Iraq to them? ( who ,if victorious will be the one's to fill that vacuum.)..
Remarkable foreign policy job ..Mr.Obama.. yes indeed! Remarkable...
Obama to Iran "lets make a deal....Iran to Obama "death to America"...
person Cheney 1994
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I
Q: Do you think the U.S., or U.N. forces, should have moved into Baghdad?
A: No.
Q: Why not?
A: "Because if we'd gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. There would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq.
Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein's government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off: part of it, the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of it -- eastern Iraq -- the Iranians would like to claim, they fought over it for eight years. In the north you've got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey.
It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq."
person Cheney 1994
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I
Q: Do you think the U.S., or U.N. forces, should have moved into Baghdad?
A: No.
Q: Why not?
A: "Because if we'd gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. There would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq.
Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein's government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off: part of it, the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of it -- eastern Iraq -- the Iranians would like to claim, they fought over it for eight years. In the north you've got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey.
It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.