I see.
It's the government's money and they give it to the corporations.
Where did I say it was the govt's money. Selective reading comprehension Cano?
Where did I say it was the govt's money. Selective reading comprehension Cano?
Where did I say it was the govt's money. Selective reading comprehension Cano?
The problem with articles like these is they fail to discuss the actualities of how foreign aid works.
To Obama supporters, it appears that he is actually providing money to a country to deal with a specific issue (illegal immigration) and they 'ra ra' that. To his detractors, he is giving away money that could be better spent elsewhere.
The reality of most foreign aid is it doesn't take the form of a check made out to the Government of XX. Often, it is money that is provided to a company/companies with US interests. Some of this policy of accounting was started by Reagan as a way to circumvent Congressional approval for providing monies to assist with covert operations. It was actually a brilliant move.
The other reality is that most often, these 'initiatives' are no more than press releases as they generally are a continuation of previous US aid.
In looking at the article, I imagine that US security firms are reaping the benefits of this 'so-called' aid. The desired results are in the right place, but I imagine that the actual methods to slow down the illegal immigration of children will result in stories the American public won't want to know about.
The problem with articles like these is they fail to discuss the actualities of how foreign aid works.
To Obama supporters, it appears that he is actually providing money to a country to deal with a specific issue (illegal immigration) and they 'ra ra' that. To his detractors, he is giving away money that could be better spent elsewhere.
The reality of most foreign aid is it doesn't take the form of a check made out to the Government of XX. Often, it is money that is provided to a company/companies with US interests. Some of this policy of accounting was started by Reagan as a way to circumvent Congressional approval for providing monies to assist with covert operations. It was actually a brilliant move.
The other reality is that most often, these 'initiatives' are no more than press releases as they generally are a continuation of previous US aid.
In looking at the article, I imagine that US security firms are reaping the benefits of this 'so-called' aid. The desired results are in the right place, but I imagine that the actual methods to slow down the illegal immigration of children will result in stories the American public won't want to know about.
The problem with articles like these is they fail to discuss the actualities of how foreign aid works.
To Obama supporters, it appears that he is actually providing money to a country to deal with a specific issue (illegal immigration) and they 'ra ra' that. To his detractors, he is giving away money that could be better spent elsewhere.
The reality of most foreign aid is it doesn't take the form of a check made out to the Government of XX. Often, it is money that is provided to a company/companies with US interests. Some of this policy of accounting was started by Reagan as a way to circumvent Congressional approval for providing monies to assist with covert operations. It was actually a brilliant move.
The other reality is that most often, these 'initiatives' are no more than press releases as they generally are a continuation of previous US aid.
In looking at the article, I imagine that US security firms are reaping the benefits of this 'so-called' aid. The desired results are in the right place, but I imagine that the actual methods to slow down the illegal immigration of children will result in stories the American public won't want to know about.
The problem with articles like these is they fail to discuss the actualities of how foreign aid works.
To Obama supporters, it appears that he is actually providing money to a country to deal with a specific issue (illegal immigration) and they 'ra ra' that. To his detractors, he is giving away money that could be better spent elsewhere.
The reality of most foreign aid is it doesn't take the form of a check made out to the Government of XX. Often, it is money that is provided to a company/companies with US interests. Some of this policy of accounting was started by Reagan as a way to circumvent Congressional approval for providing monies to assist with covert operations. It was actually a brilliant move.
The other reality is that most often, these 'initiatives' are no more than press releases as they generally are a continuation of previous US aid.
In looking at the article, I imagine that US security firms are reaping the benefits of this 'so-called' aid. The desired results are in the right place, but I imagine that the actual methods to slow down the illegal immigration of children will result in stories the American public won't want to know about.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.