So,if the atmospher has X amount of natural source CO2 created by all those natural events volcanoes, plants ,animals etc ..they takes up Y amount of atmospheric space ...then there is only Z amount of room for man-made co2 in the atmospher ..and if the mass of man-made CO2 exceeds a certain level .. this extra mass of man-made CO2 build- up ... increases the temps around the world raise,,.
Ok ..so what are methods that scientist are using to measure atmospheric carbon dioxide and determine which CO2 is coming from what source? ..and how reliable are the findings ?
Now, if we wanted to lower the amount of CO2 in the earths atmosphere...we could figure out how to capture huge amounts of the gas and turn it into dry ice..to cool thing down ..lol
So,if the atmospher has X amount of natural source CO2 created by all those natural events volcanoes, plants ,animals etc ..they takes up Y amount of atmospheric space ...then there is only Z amount of room for man-made co2 in the atmospher ..and if the mass of man-made CO2 exceeds a certain level .. this extra mass of man-made CO2 build- up ... increases the temps around the world raise,,.
Ok ..so what are methods that scientist are using to measure atmospheric carbon dioxide and determine which CO2 is coming from what source? ..and how reliable are the findings ?
Now, if we wanted to lower the amount of CO2 in the earths atmosphere...we could figure out how to capture huge amounts of the gas and turn it into dry ice..to cool thing down ..lol
So,if the atmospher has X amount of natural source CO2 created by all those natural events volcanoes, plants ,animals etc ..they takes up Y amount of atmospheric space ...then there is only Z amount of room for man-made co2 in the atmospher ..and if the mass of man-made CO2 exceeds a certain level .. this extra mass of man-made CO2 build- up ... increases the temps around the world raise,,.
Ok ..so what are methods that scientist are using to measure atmospheric carbon dioxide and determine which CO2 is coming from what source? ..and how reliable are the findings ?
Now, if we wanted to lower the amount of CO2 in the earths atmosphere...we could figure out how to capture huge amounts of the gas and turn it into dry ice..to cool thing down ..lol
I believe the answers are isotopes and isotope analysis. On a scale of 1 to 10 on how reliable the science is, I would give it a 7 or 9 because even DNA testing isn’t 100 percent accurate.
So,if the atmospher has X amount of natural source CO2 created by all those natural events volcanoes, plants ,animals etc ..they takes up Y amount of atmospheric space ...then there is only Z amount of room for man-made co2 in the atmospher ..and if the mass of man-made CO2 exceeds a certain level .. this extra mass of man-made CO2 build- up ... increases the temps around the world raise,,.
Ok ..so what are methods that scientist are using to measure atmospheric carbon dioxide and determine which CO2 is coming from what source? ..and how reliable are the findings ?
Now, if we wanted to lower the amount of CO2 in the earths atmosphere...we could figure out how to capture huge amounts of the gas and turn it into dry ice..to cool thing down ..lol
I believe the answers are isotopes and isotope analysis. On a scale of 1 to 10 on how reliable the science is, I would give it a 7 or 9 because even DNA testing isn’t 100 percent accurate.
I believe the answers are isotopes and isotope analysis. On a scale of 1 to 10 on how reliable the science is, I would give it a 7 or 9 because even DNA testing isn’t 100 percent accurate.
...
Money on another note I. saw this article today and if you haven't seen it ....it's a quick read ..that I found interesting..
I believe the answers are isotopes and isotope analysis. On a scale of 1 to 10 on how reliable the science is, I would give it a 7 or 9 because even DNA testing isn’t 100 percent accurate.
...
Money on another note I. saw this article today and if you haven't seen it ....it's a quick read ..that I found interesting..
... I’m surprised you even have an interest in science. Religious people call scientists demon seeds of the devil and think that science is the work of the devil. I have to keep my political beliefs a secret and my fascination in science a secret...
That’s an interesting discovery. I see some scientists thinking that ocean water may have migrated to the surface from the Earth's mantle. I thought the opposite when I read this. I wonder if water seeped into the earth during formation or if there could be holes in the earth where water seeps through...
... I’m surprised you even have an interest in science. Religious people call scientists demon seeds of the devil and think that science is the work of the devil. I have to keep my political beliefs a secret and my fascination in science a secret...
That’s an interesting discovery. I see some scientists thinking that ocean water may have migrated to the surface from the Earth's mantle. I thought the opposite when I read this. I wonder if water seeped into the earth during formation or if there could be holes in the earth where water seeps through...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.