if you don't want the govt helping poor women get access to birth control, than i imagine you are cool with the govt picking up the tab for the upbringing of the children she will probably be raising alone?
Which road would be more efficient and sensible from a govt. funding standpoint?
Help them get protection or pay for the kid that the pro lifers says can't be aborted?
Help them pay for protection or let Planned partenthood get more business?
its a very small price to pay for good govt
Personally, if I knew it would help I would be for it. The only problem is there is no way to quantify it.
There's still no getting around the fact that some people are against abortion and contraception based on religious beliefs. The Little Sisters, which is a group of nuns, are being told they have to provide these services. They're nuns for Christ sakes. The Catholic church has been around a helluva lot longer than Obamacare. This would be equivalent to the government telling a J-E-W-I-S-H or Muslim organization they had to eat pork.
if you don't want the govt helping poor women get access to birth control, than i imagine you are cool with the govt picking up the tab for the upbringing of the children she will probably be raising alone?
Which road would be more efficient and sensible from a govt. funding standpoint?
Help them get protection or pay for the kid that the pro lifers says can't be aborted?
Help them pay for protection or let Planned partenthood get more business?
its a very small price to pay for good govt
Personally, if I knew it would help I would be for it. The only problem is there is no way to quantify it.
There's still no getting around the fact that some people are against abortion and contraception based on religious beliefs. The Little Sisters, which is a group of nuns, are being told they have to provide these services. They're nuns for Christ sakes. The Catholic church has been around a helluva lot longer than Obamacare. This would be equivalent to the government telling a J-E-W-I-S-H or Muslim organization they had to eat pork.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.