In my opinion, this is why the left doesn't trust the average American with guns. They project how they would act with them onto everyone else.
It is also baffling to me why the left wants to live in a society where the military and police have guns.
Anyway, this loon said the following:
From: Christopher Jordan Dorner
"Wayne LaPierre, President of the NRA, you’re a vile and inhumane piece of shit”
"Too bad Trayvon didn’t smash your skull completely open, Zim”
his attack on President Barack Obama’s critics -“You question his birth certificate, his educational and professional accomplishments, and his judeo-christian beliefs”
Oh and of course the media is busy doing their best to cover this up.
More on that here: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/la-manhunt-suspect-christopher-dorner-419213
So when are Obama supporting liberals going to stop shooting people anyway? The number of rapes, robberies, assaults, murders, and attacks on police at Tea Party rallies still remains at zero.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
In my opinion, this is why the left doesn't trust the average American with guns. They project how they would act with them onto everyone else.
It is also baffling to me why the left wants to live in a society where the military and police have guns.
Anyway, this loon said the following:
From: Christopher Jordan Dorner
"Wayne LaPierre, President of the NRA, you’re a vile and inhumane piece of shit”
"Too bad Trayvon didn’t smash your skull completely open, Zim”
his attack on President Barack Obama’s critics -“You question his birth certificate, his educational and professional accomplishments, and his judeo-christian beliefs”
Oh and of course the media is busy doing their best to cover this up.
More on that here: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/la-manhunt-suspect-christopher-dorner-419213
So when are Obama supporting liberals going to stop shooting people anyway? The number of rapes, robberies, assaults, murders, and attacks on police at Tea Party rallies still remains at zero.
Two women who were shot by Los Angeles police in Torrance early Thursday during a massive manhunt for an ex-LAPD officer were delivering newspapers, sources said.
The women, shot in the 19500 block of Redbeam Avenue, were taken to area hospitals, Torrance police Lt. Devin Chase said. They were not identified. One was shot in the hand and the other in the back, according to Jesse Escochea, who captured video of the victims being treated.
It was not immediately known what newspapers the women were delivering. After the shooting, the blue pickup was riddled with bullet holes and what appeared to be newspapers lay in the street alongside.
Good thing the "trained professionals" acted responsibly with their firearms, huh?
0
Note:
Two women who were shot by Los Angeles police in Torrance early Thursday during a massive manhunt for an ex-LAPD officer were delivering newspapers, sources said.
The women, shot in the 19500 block of Redbeam Avenue, were taken to area hospitals, Torrance police Lt. Devin Chase said. They were not identified. One was shot in the hand and the other in the back, according to Jesse Escochea, who captured video of the victims being treated.
It was not immediately known what newspapers the women were delivering. After the shooting, the blue pickup was riddled with bullet holes and what appeared to be newspapers lay in the street alongside.
This whole story is bizarre. For all of the garbage people see on fox. This makes it clear that msnbc and CNN are just as bad if not worse.
I hate the whole blaming a party for a whacked out killer. I refuse to do it, but in this case, in the chic filet shooter case. Those are two individuals that were completely brainwashed by media.
0
This whole story is bizarre. For all of the garbage people see on fox. This makes it clear that msnbc and CNN are just as bad if not worse.
I hate the whole blaming a party for a whacked out killer. I refuse to do it, but in this case, in the chic filet shooter case. Those are two individuals that were completely brainwashed by media.
The Family Research Council shooter, who pleaded guilty today to a terrorism charge, picked his target off a "hate map" on the website of the ultra-liberal Southern Poverty Law Center which is upset with the conservative group's opposition to happy rights.
Floyd Lee Corkins II pleaded guilty to three charges including a charge of committing an act of terrorism related to the August 15, 2012 injuring of FRC's guard. He told the FBI that he wanted to kill anti-happy targets and went to the law center's website for ideas.
At a court hearing where his comments to the FBI were revealed, he said that he intended to "kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-Fil-A sandwiches in victims' faces, and kill the guard." The shooting occurred after an executive with Chick-Fil-A announced his support for traditional marriage, angering same-sex marriage proponents.
Why are all these people with left wing political views out shooting people?
0
Oh nice:
The Family Research Council shooter, who pleaded guilty today to a terrorism charge, picked his target off a "hate map" on the website of the ultra-liberal Southern Poverty Law Center which is upset with the conservative group's opposition to happy rights.
Floyd Lee Corkins II pleaded guilty to three charges including a charge of committing an act of terrorism related to the August 15, 2012 injuring of FRC's guard. He told the FBI that he wanted to kill anti-happy targets and went to the law center's website for ideas.
At a court hearing where his comments to the FBI were revealed, he said that he intended to "kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-Fil-A sandwiches in victims' faces, and kill the guard." The shooting occurred after an executive with Chick-Fil-A announced his support for traditional marriage, angering same-sex marriage proponents.
while i agree there are nuts on both sides, this guy doesn't sound completely brainwashed by the media. what the hell do we really know about the guy but i read his manifesto and it sounds like he is pissed at the corruption in the LAPD. i'm sure no one doubts that there is a shitload of corruption in the LAPD. if you read his manfesto, he is pretty intelligent and i'm sure he makes good points about LAPD corruption. unfortunately, he's also a nutjob and went way off the deep end so whatever good points he makes will be lost in his craziness.
0
while i agree there are nuts on both sides, this guy doesn't sound completely brainwashed by the media. what the hell do we really know about the guy but i read his manifesto and it sounds like he is pissed at the corruption in the LAPD. i'm sure no one doubts that there is a shitload of corruption in the LAPD. if you read his manfesto, he is pretty intelligent and i'm sure he makes good points about LAPD corruption. unfortunately, he's also a nutjob and went way off the deep end so whatever good points he makes will be lost in his craziness.
while i agree there are nuts on both sides, this guy doesn't sound completely brainwashed by the media. what the hell do we really know about the guy but i read his manifesto and it sounds like he is pissed at the corruption in the LAPD. i'm sure no one doubts that there is a shitload of corruption in the LAPD. if you read his manfesto, he is pretty intelligent and i'm sure he makes good points about LAPD corruption. unfortunately, he's also a nutjob and went way off the deep end so whatever good points he makes will be lost in his craziness.
Best description of a Covers political forum contributer
Club
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
while i agree there are nuts on both sides, this guy doesn't sound completely brainwashed by the media. what the hell do we really know about the guy but i read his manifesto and it sounds like he is pissed at the corruption in the LAPD. i'm sure no one doubts that there is a shitload of corruption in the LAPD. if you read his manfesto, he is pretty intelligent and i'm sure he makes good points about LAPD corruption. unfortunately, he's also a nutjob and went way off the deep end so whatever good points he makes will be lost in his craziness.
Best description of a Covers political forum contributer
The guy lost his job and is mad at the LAPD and the people who cost him his job. This has nothing to do with democrat or republican or Obama.
Da road you have got to knock this constant crap off, where you try to associate everything that happens each day with Obama somehow playing a part in it.
It really is getting old now and even members of your own party dont agree with you
0
The guy lost his job and is mad at the LAPD and the people who cost him his job. This has nothing to do with democrat or republican or Obama.
Da road you have got to knock this constant crap off, where you try to associate everything that happens each day with Obama somehow playing a part in it.
It really is getting old now and even members of your own party dont agree with you
I hate the whole blaming a party for a whacked out killer. I refuse to do it, but in this case, in the chic filet shooter case. Those are two individuals that were completely brainwashed by media.
You hate to do it so much that you did it.
Clearly, you would agree that the individual in this thread was also brainswashed.
Ooops, you didn't. I cannot imagine why you are labled extremist.
Oh yeah, you aren't because you support happy rights. Just as long as the state allows it without the feds.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:
I hate the whole blaming a party for a whacked out killer. I refuse to do it, but in this case, in the chic filet shooter case. Those are two individuals that were completely brainwashed by media.
You hate to do it so much that you did it.
Clearly, you would agree that the individual in this thread was also brainswashed.
The guy lost his job and is mad at the LAPD and the people who cost him his job. This has nothing to do with democrat or republican or Obama.
Da road you have got to knock this constant crap off, where you try to associate everything that happens each day with Obama somehow playing a part in it.
It really is getting old now and even members of your own party dont agree with you
THAT coming from the guy who blames the Post Office's financial problems on Republicans.
Note: Democrats supported, and still support, the Post Office's pre-funding of future pension obligations.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
The guy lost his job and is mad at the LAPD and the people who cost him his job. This has nothing to do with democrat or republican or Obama.
Da road you have got to knock this constant crap off, where you try to associate everything that happens each day with Obama somehow playing a part in it.
It really is getting old now and even members of your own party dont agree with you
THAT coming from the guy who blames the Post Office's financial problems on Republicans.
Note: Democrats supported, and still support, the Post Office's pre-funding of future pension obligations.
The guy lost his job and is mad at the LAPD and the people who cost him his job. This has nothing to do with democrat or republican or Obama.
He was a big fan of MSNBC, spouted every leftist talking point and gushed about the first lady's latest haircut.
It actually has everything to do with liberals as they constantly assure us that "Tea Party Crazies" are going to shooting things up. Even though left wingers are the ones out doing the shooting.
It is psychological projection.
0
The guy lost his job and is mad at the LAPD and the people who cost him his job. This has nothing to do with democrat or republican or Obama.
He was a big fan of MSNBC, spouted every leftist talking point and gushed about the first lady's latest haircut.
It actually has everything to do with liberals as they constantly assure us that "Tea Party Crazies" are going to shooting things up. Even though left wingers are the ones out doing the shooting.
It is funny how all the people wringing their hands over the elementary school shooting are utterly absent here. Why could that be?
Oh, note how the left behaves when shootings happen:
The 2009 massacre of three Pittsburgh police officers (which lib journos falsely blamed on Fox News, Glenn Beck, and the "heated, apocalyptic rhetoric of the anti-Obama forces"); the 2009 suicide insurance scam/murder hoax of Kentucky census worker Bill Sparkman (which New York magazine falsely blamed on Rush Limbaugh, "conservative media personalities, websites and even members of Congress"); the 2009 Holocaust-museum shooting (which MSNBC commentator Joan Walsh blamed on Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, and Michelle Malkin); the 2010 Times Square jihad bomb plot (which Mayor Michael Bloomberg falsely blamed on tea-party activists protesting Obamacare); and the 2011 Tucson massacre, which liberals continue to blame on former GOP vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
0
It is funny how all the people wringing their hands over the elementary school shooting are utterly absent here. Why could that be?
Oh, note how the left behaves when shootings happen:
The 2009 massacre of three Pittsburgh police officers (which lib journos falsely blamed on Fox News, Glenn Beck, and the "heated, apocalyptic rhetoric of the anti-Obama forces"); the 2009 suicide insurance scam/murder hoax of Kentucky census worker Bill Sparkman (which New York magazine falsely blamed on Rush Limbaugh, "conservative media personalities, websites and even members of Congress"); the 2009 Holocaust-museum shooting (which MSNBC commentator Joan Walsh blamed on Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, and Michelle Malkin); the 2010 Times Square jihad bomb plot (which Mayor Michael Bloomberg falsely blamed on tea-party activists protesting Obamacare); and the 2011 Tucson massacre, which liberals continue to blame on former GOP vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
back here in the real world, it seems obvious, but i would say killing 20 little kids in school is a little different from a disgruntled government employee killing three co-workers, but it seems like this story is getting plenty of attention.
0
back here in the real world, it seems obvious, but i would say killing 20 little kids in school is a little different from a disgruntled government employee killing three co-workers, but it seems like this story is getting plenty of attention.
Ooops, you didn't. I cannot imagine why you are labled extremist.
Oh yeah, you aren't because you support happy rights. Just as long as the state allows it without the feds.
I agree, there was definitely something wrong with the guy that killed a bus driver kidnapped a kid to bring him to his underground bunker. I think that goes without saying. Maybe doomsday preppers brainwashed him, who knows.
The Chic Filet guy is actually the first act of political terrorism in quite a while, I am shocked that this is not garnering more media coverage.
Either way, I hope my extremist views and attitudes don't hurt your feelings any more, you seem to be quite twisted out of shape.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
You hate to do it so much that you did it.
Clearly, you would agree that the individual in this thread was also brainswashed.
Ooops, you didn't. I cannot imagine why you are labled extremist.
Oh yeah, you aren't because you support happy rights. Just as long as the state allows it without the feds.
I agree, there was definitely something wrong with the guy that killed a bus driver kidnapped a kid to bring him to his underground bunker. I think that goes without saying. Maybe doomsday preppers brainwashed him, who knows.
The Chic Filet guy is actually the first act of political terrorism in quite a while, I am shocked that this is not garnering more media coverage.
Either way, I hope my extremist views and attitudes don't hurt your feelings any more, you seem to be quite twisted out of shape.
I agree, there was definitely something wrong with the guy that killed a bus driver kidnapped a kid to bring him to his underground bunker. I think that goes without saying. Maybe doomsday preppers brainwashed him, who knows.
The Chic Filet guy is actually the first act of political terrorism in quite a while, I am shocked that this is not garnering more media coverage.
Either way, I hope my extremist views and attitudes don't hurt your feelings any more, you seem to be quite twisted out of shape.
I'm not surprised at all.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:
I agree, there was definitely something wrong with the guy that killed a bus driver kidnapped a kid to bring him to his underground bunker. I think that goes without saying. Maybe doomsday preppers brainwashed him, who knows.
The Chic Filet guy is actually the first act of political terrorism in quite a while, I am shocked that this is not garnering more media coverage.
Either way, I hope my extremist views and attitudes don't hurt your feelings any more, you seem to be quite twisted out of shape.
Listen pal are you friggin brain dead or something, because i dont just take sides with my own party on every issue, like you do. Last week i blasted my party on the gun ban, so really get your head out of your butt and start paying attention.
I address issues, and what party i belong to doesnt make my mind up on the issue. I can clearly think for myself, unlike you who has never gone against the right wingers ever on this site.
I never said the republicans caused all the postal services problems, i said the republican controlled congress in 2006 passed all kinds of bills that hurt the postal service, so get your facts right before you speak, because 99 percent of the time you are wrong.
I also said very bad management has caused the postal services problems. For years and years they have been under charging for postal rates, which has really hurt them.
But off course right wing flakes all just want to blame the unions and dont even bother to see who the real problem is.
Maybe someday, you will actually learn to use your own mind on things, instead of being a party sheep, baa, baa, baa
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
THAT coming from the guy who blames the Post Office's financial problems on Republicans.
Note: Democrats supported, and still support, the Post Office's pre-funding of future pension obligations.
0
Listen pal are you friggin brain dead or something, because i dont just take sides with my own party on every issue, like you do. Last week i blasted my party on the gun ban, so really get your head out of your butt and start paying attention.
I address issues, and what party i belong to doesnt make my mind up on the issue. I can clearly think for myself, unlike you who has never gone against the right wingers ever on this site.
I never said the republicans caused all the postal services problems, i said the republican controlled congress in 2006 passed all kinds of bills that hurt the postal service, so get your facts right before you speak, because 99 percent of the time you are wrong.
I also said very bad management has caused the postal services problems. For years and years they have been under charging for postal rates, which has really hurt them.
But off course right wing flakes all just want to blame the unions and dont even bother to see who the real problem is.
Maybe someday, you will actually learn to use your own mind on things, instead of being a party sheep, baa, baa, baa
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
THAT coming from the guy who blames the Post Office's financial problems on Republicans.
Note: Democrats supported, and still support, the Post Office's pre-funding of future pension obligations.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.