How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Republicans vs Liberals
Red vs Blue
O'reily vs Obama
Paycheck vs Welfare check
How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
Good post.
Although I think that calling the Repubs brainless and lazy is a little bit extreme.
0
Quote Originally Posted by aaustinova67:
Republicans vs Liberals
Red vs Blue
O'reily vs Obama
Paycheck vs Welfare check
How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
Good post.
Although I think that calling the Repubs brainless and lazy is a little bit extreme.
although there is one thing that we do agree on and that is that the red states have the largest percentage of individuals in the 47%. This much has been shown numerous times in recent months.
0
although there is one thing that we do agree on and that is that the red states have the largest percentage of individuals in the 47%. This much has been shown numerous times in recent months.
How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
Did you skip your Meds today?
0
Quote Originally Posted by aaustinova67:
Republicans vs Liberals
Red vs Blue
O'reily vs Obama
Paycheck vs Welfare check
How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
You should be ashamed of yourself popping off as though a civil war is a good thing. Have you ever been to a war zone.
Have you ever seen a war movie? That should be sufficient enough to tell you that you don't want one I. Your back yard. With your loved ones in the crosshairs.
0
You should be ashamed of yourself popping off as though a civil war is a good thing. Have you ever been to a war zone.
Have you ever seen a war movie? That should be sufficient enough to tell you that you don't want one I. Your back yard. With your loved ones in the crosshairs.
You should be ashamed of yourself popping off as though a civil war is a good thing. Have you ever been to a war zone.
Have you ever seen a war movie? That should be sufficient enough to tell you that you don't want one I. Your back yard. With your loved ones in the crosshairs.
Austin you really need to shut the fuck up. This isn't a game of Call of Duty you're suggesting, it's war. You're actually promoting people dying and families being torn apart all because your candidate didn't get elected. You're a douche bag in every sense of the word.
Go fuck yourself.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:
You should be ashamed of yourself popping off as though a civil war is a good thing. Have you ever been to a war zone.
Have you ever seen a war movie? That should be sufficient enough to tell you that you don't want one I. Your back yard. With your loved ones in the crosshairs.
Austin you really need to shut the fuck up. This isn't a game of Call of Duty you're suggesting, it's war. You're actually promoting people dying and families being torn apart all because your candidate didn't get elected. You're a douche bag in every sense of the word.
The government considers it a game, like Monopoly except we are the players. They keep printing money and giving it away. There will some day be ramifications for this, it's inevitable. Whether it's civil war or not is definitely a fair question. Eventually our dear leader will divide the country to the point that it could happen.
The "Fiscal Cliff" will be $1.7T in cuts to defense/non-defense over 10 years and not touch entitlements. God forbid he take away any of the freebies. I'm sure employees (that's people that work for a living) get faced once in a while with owners (there the bad people in the libs minds) that say we have to cut back and you need to take a 10% paycut or a cut on hours due to our business (that's a company that MAKES money or closes the doors if it runs out) struggling. The employee usually opts for the cut to keep a job or help the company survive (unlike union run employees like Hostess).
But heaven forbid you look at the freeloaders and tell them they have to take a 10% cut in food stamps or housing aid. It's just unacceptable when you run the game.
0
The government considers it a game, like Monopoly except we are the players. They keep printing money and giving it away. There will some day be ramifications for this, it's inevitable. Whether it's civil war or not is definitely a fair question. Eventually our dear leader will divide the country to the point that it could happen.
The "Fiscal Cliff" will be $1.7T in cuts to defense/non-defense over 10 years and not touch entitlements. God forbid he take away any of the freebies. I'm sure employees (that's people that work for a living) get faced once in a while with owners (there the bad people in the libs minds) that say we have to cut back and you need to take a 10% paycut or a cut on hours due to our business (that's a company that MAKES money or closes the doors if it runs out) struggling. The employee usually opts for the cut to keep a job or help the company survive (unlike union run employees like Hostess).
But heaven forbid you look at the freeloaders and tell them they have to take a 10% cut in food stamps or housing aid. It's just unacceptable when you run the game.
why when rightwingers refer to freeloaders, does it always mean thigns like food stamps and housing aid but never refers to corporate welfare when corporate welfare is such a bigger number?
0
why when rightwingers refer to freeloaders, does it always mean thigns like food stamps and housing aid but never refers to corporate welfare when corporate welfare is such a bigger number?
What corporate welfare? GM ($25B), Solyndra ($550M), et al?
Is that what your refering to? Please describe what "corporate welfare" is because I'll claim ignorance. What I am informed about is if the small business I work for goes under, nobody's bailing it out.
0
What corporate welfare? GM ($25B), Solyndra ($550M), et al?
Is that what your refering to? Please describe what "corporate welfare" is because I'll claim ignorance. What I am informed about is if the small business I work for goes under, nobody's bailing it out.
So Dirt, whose approving all the giveaways? The Federal Government correct? Too big, too powerful and too influential over EVERYTHING. I believe in states rights and their dwindling everyday. The federal gov is a monster now, and growing, I have no problem with stopping all the giveaways or at least unnecessary ones. Obviously, some people need help but at 47%, and as far as the corporate welfare, that's corruption plain and simple and it's wrong.
I think the solution is may be in this threads subject, but it won't happen until people get hungry, which might not be far off. Then you'll see our Feds in their glory. A government big enough to give you everything is also powerful enough to take it all away. Why do you think the left would love to take away the 2nd amendment?
0
So Dirt, whose approving all the giveaways? The Federal Government correct? Too big, too powerful and too influential over EVERYTHING. I believe in states rights and their dwindling everyday. The federal gov is a monster now, and growing, I have no problem with stopping all the giveaways or at least unnecessary ones. Obviously, some people need help but at 47%, and as far as the corporate welfare, that's corruption plain and simple and it's wrong.
I think the solution is may be in this threads subject, but it won't happen until people get hungry, which might not be far off. Then you'll see our Feds in their glory. A government big enough to give you everything is also powerful enough to take it all away. Why do you think the left would love to take away the 2nd amendment?
How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
How did all of your election predictions pan out? So much for your large bet on VA being a "lock". Sour grapes here buddy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by aaustinova67:
Republicans vs Liberals
Red vs Blue
O'reily vs Obama
Paycheck vs Welfare check
How can I help my country vs how can my country help me
Brains vs Brainless
Ambitious vs Lazy
Itd be great!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dem's would get their ass kicked because they would all be sitting around waiting for somebody else to do the fighting for them!!!
How did all of your election predictions pan out? So much for your large bet on VA being a "lock". Sour grapes here buddy.
So Dirt, whose approving all the giveaways? The Federal Government correct? Too big, too powerful and too influential over EVERYTHING. I believe in states rights and their dwindling everyday. The federal gov is a monster now, and growing, I have no problem with stopping all the giveaways or at least unnecessary ones. Obviously, some people need help but at 47%, and as far as the corporate welfare, that's corruption plain and simple and it's wrong.
I think the solution is may be in this threads subject, but it won't happen until people get hungry, which might not be far off. Then you'll see our Feds in their glory. A government big enough to give you everything is also powerful enough to take it all away. Why do you think the left would love to take away the 2nd amendment?
You are a dog barking up the wrong tree.
The answer is the Republican controlled Congress with a 17% approval rating.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
So Dirt, whose approving all the giveaways? The Federal Government correct? Too big, too powerful and too influential over EVERYTHING. I believe in states rights and their dwindling everyday. The federal gov is a monster now, and growing, I have no problem with stopping all the giveaways or at least unnecessary ones. Obviously, some people need help but at 47%, and as far as the corporate welfare, that's corruption plain and simple and it's wrong.
I think the solution is may be in this threads subject, but it won't happen until people get hungry, which might not be far off. Then you'll see our Feds in their glory. A government big enough to give you everything is also powerful enough to take it all away. Why do you think the left would love to take away the 2nd amendment?
You are a dog barking up the wrong tree.
The answer is the Republican controlled Congress with a 17% approval rating.
The answer is the Republican controlled Congress with a 17% approval rating.
Good point. And unfortunately this is a point that is all too often ignored. Republican or democrat -- people are all too quick to think that the president is the sole person responsible for all decisions. and fail to realize that he does not make all of the decisions by himself.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
You are a dog barking up the wrong tree.
The answer is the Republican controlled Congress with a 17% approval rating.
Good point. And unfortunately this is a point that is all too often ignored. Republican or democrat -- people are all too quick to think that the president is the sole person responsible for all decisions. and fail to realize that he does not make all of the decisions by himself.
Good point. And unfortunately this is a point that is all too often ignored. Republican or democrat -- people are all too quick to think that the president is the sole person responsible for all decisions. and fail to realize that he does not make all of the decisions by himself.
I think you are being nice about it. Of course they KNOW. They choose to ignore that if the Potus isn't who they want. You know it's bad when you disagree with someone, you are automaticallly being termed a liberal or conservative as if it's so black and white.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:
Good point. And unfortunately this is a point that is all too often ignored. Republican or democrat -- people are all too quick to think that the president is the sole person responsible for all decisions. and fail to realize that he does not make all of the decisions by himself.
I think you are being nice about it. Of course they KNOW. They choose to ignore that if the Potus isn't who they want. You know it's bad when you disagree with someone, you are automaticallly being termed a liberal or conservative as if it's so black and white.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.