Here is how I would play the labby line if I started following your system today. I have 3 lines for each game progression consisting of 4 numbers of 1/2 unit each. Bet to win the 2 outside numbers total. With each win cross off those two numbers. With a loss add that loss to the end of the line.
I like this system because it takes the sting out of a team winning 6 in a row. For example if A game KC goes on a 6 game win streak, I'd lose roughly 6 units plus juice instead of 74 plus juice if you kept doubling up.
I'll show the lines for a few days using $10 as a unit size for easy math. We are betting to win $10 on each team. For a dog, bet $10 to win more. When I do this, I will either just pocket the extra gains or lower the number on any losses. Will deal with this when it comes up.
Here is how I would play the labby line if I started following your system today. I have 3 lines for each game progression consisting of 4 numbers of 1/2 unit each. Bet to win the 2 outside numbers total. With each win cross off those two numbers. With a loss add that loss to the end of the line.
I like this system because it takes the sting out of a team winning 6 in a row. For example if A game KC goes on a 6 game win streak, I'd lose roughly 6 units plus juice instead of 74 plus juice if you kept doubling up.
I'll show the lines for a few days using $10 as a unit size for easy math. We are betting to win $10 on each team. For a dog, bet $10 to win more. When I do this, I will either just pocket the extra gains or lower the number on any losses. Will deal with this when it comes up.
Here is how I would play the labby line if I started following your system today. I have 3 lines for each game progression consisting of 4 numbers of 1/2 unit each. Bet to win the 2 outside numbers total. With each win cross off those two numbers. With a loss add that loss to the end of the line.
I like this system because it takes the sting out of a team winning 6 in a row. For example if A game KC goes on a 6 game win streak, I'd lose roughly 6 units plus juice instead of 74 plus juice if you kept doubling up.
I'll show the lines for a few days using $10 as a unit size for easy math. We are betting to win $10 on each team. For a dog, bet $10 to win more. When I do this, I will either just pocket the extra gains or lower the number on any losses. Will deal with this when it comes up.
A: 5-5-5-5 Sox $11 to win $10
A: 5-5-5-5 Houston $10 to win $13
A: 5-5-5-5
B: 5-5-5-5 Miami $10 to win $12.50
B: 5-5-5-5
B: 5-5-5-5
C: 5-5-5-5 Cubs $20 to win $10
C: 5-5-5-5
C: 5-5-5-5
Hi Dan,
First off, nice to see you back in action!
What made you chose 3 labby lines per game?
I'm assuming a game 4 would be bet on line A, 5 on B, 6 on C
Here is how I would play the labby line if I started following your system today. I have 3 lines for each game progression consisting of 4 numbers of 1/2 unit each. Bet to win the 2 outside numbers total. With each win cross off those two numbers. With a loss add that loss to the end of the line.
I like this system because it takes the sting out of a team winning 6 in a row. For example if A game KC goes on a 6 game win streak, I'd lose roughly 6 units plus juice instead of 74 plus juice if you kept doubling up.
I'll show the lines for a few days using $10 as a unit size for easy math. We are betting to win $10 on each team. For a dog, bet $10 to win more. When I do this, I will either just pocket the extra gains or lower the number on any losses. Will deal with this when it comes up.
A: 5-5-5-5 Sox $11 to win $10
A: 5-5-5-5 Houston $10 to win $13
A: 5-5-5-5
B: 5-5-5-5 Miami $10 to win $12.50
B: 5-5-5-5
B: 5-5-5-5
C: 5-5-5-5 Cubs $20 to win $10
C: 5-5-5-5
C: 5-5-5-5
Hi Dan,
First off, nice to see you back in action!
What made you chose 3 labby lines per game?
I'm assuming a game 4 would be bet on line A, 5 on B, 6 on C
No, I have 2 lines for the D game and one each for E and F since there are less games. I went with 3 lines for each because there are often times when there are multiple A or B games on the same day.
No, I have 2 lines for the D game and one each for E and F since there are less games. I went with 3 lines for each because there are often times when there are multiple A or B games on the same day.
The above is a good example of labby line risk. How much would you be risking if you have chased betting against Philly to the D game? I'm risking 1.8 units to win 1 unit. I think the lines for the 3 Philly wins were something like -170, -240 and -200. Even at $10 unit size your losses would be $17, $64.80, $184. So, today to win all that back plus a $10 unit you would need to risk $496.80 @ -180 to win $276.
The above is a good example of labby line risk. How much would you be risking if you have chased betting against Philly to the D game? I'm risking 1.8 units to win 1 unit. I think the lines for the 3 Philly wins were something like -170, -240 and -200. Even at $10 unit size your losses would be $17, $64.80, $184. So, today to win all that back plus a $10 unit you would need to risk $496.80 @ -180 to win $276.
over 1000 units, that how much you would lose if you martingale this on the Blue Jays tomorrow and they lose.... In fact IDK if you even have units to do that, really hope PPL took Dan's advice and labby lined because that's the only way to do it.
over 1000 units, that how much you would lose if you martingale this on the Blue Jays tomorrow and they lose.... In fact IDK if you even have units to do that, really hope PPL took Dan's advice and labby lined because that's the only way to do it.
over 1000 units, that how much you would lose if you martingale this on the Blue Jays tomorrow and they lose.... In fact IDK if you even have units to do that, really hope PPL took Dan's advice and labby lined because that's the only way to do it.
You seem to only post when the system is reaching the upper limits. Congratulations on pointing out the obvious. I made it very clear ( if you had bother to read post # 3 what my intentions were ). But let me repeat myself once again : " I will be using a martingale , but feel free to use a progressive betting sequence that you are most comfortable with."
Now if you have issues with me using a Marty, that's not really a concern of yours now is it ? There is no gun pointed at your head to use a Marty or to even post here as a matter of fact. Bettors have the right to make their own judgments about the validity of any system.
over 1000 units, that how much you would lose if you martingale this on the Blue Jays tomorrow and they lose.... In fact IDK if you even have units to do that, really hope PPL took Dan's advice and labby lined because that's the only way to do it.
You seem to only post when the system is reaching the upper limits. Congratulations on pointing out the obvious. I made it very clear ( if you had bother to read post # 3 what my intentions were ). But let me repeat myself once again : " I will be using a martingale , but feel free to use a progressive betting sequence that you are most comfortable with."
Now if you have issues with me using a Marty, that's not really a concern of yours now is it ? There is no gun pointed at your head to use a Marty or to even post here as a matter of fact. Bettors have the right to make their own judgments about the validity of any system.
AR, just to be clear, I was in no way trying to bash your system when I posted about the labby line betting. I simply wanted to offer an option for those looking to reduce some risk.
You got the E game win today and we both need to have Toronto come through tonight to avoid a system loss. BOL
AR, just to be clear, I was in no way trying to bash your system when I posted about the labby line betting. I simply wanted to offer an option for those looking to reduce some risk.
You got the E game win today and we both need to have Toronto come through tonight to avoid a system loss. BOL
Again IDK how ppl who use martingale still had units left, but congrats to all the ppl the stuck with it, but i hope that after Dan's posts and this series, everyone starts to use a labby for a 6 game chase.
Again IDK how ppl who use martingale still had units left, but congrats to all the ppl the stuck with it, but i hope that after Dan's posts and this series, everyone starts to use a labby for a 6 game chase.
AR, just to be clear, I was in no way trying to bash your system when I posted about the labby line betting. I simply wanted to offer an option for those looking to reduce some risk.
You got the E game win today and we both need to have Toronto come through tonight to avoid a system loss. BOL
Hi Dan,
I really appreciate and I'm sure that other followers of your posts heartily approve of any insights that you may choose to offer. Its very refreshing to hear other positive points of view and we really all have the same goal here on this forum. To end the season on a positive note. There is no perfect system, we only hope to be on the right side when we decide to get off of the train.
AR, just to be clear, I was in no way trying to bash your system when I posted about the labby line betting. I simply wanted to offer an option for those looking to reduce some risk.
You got the E game win today and we both need to have Toronto come through tonight to avoid a system loss. BOL
Hi Dan,
I really appreciate and I'm sure that other followers of your posts heartily approve of any insights that you may choose to offer. Its very refreshing to hear other positive points of view and we really all have the same goal here on this forum. To end the season on a positive note. There is no perfect system, we only hope to be on the right side when we decide to get off of the train.
Id like to give a huge shout out to both of the closing pitchers for the Rockies and the Mets. They managed to both give up three runs in the 9th inning which all but guaranteed that both teams snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
Series net unit record since May 01 : ( + 34 )
( A ) : 92 - 72 ( B ) : 31 - 40 ( C ) : 19 - 20 ( D ) : 9 - 11 ( E ) : 6 - 5 ( F ) : 3 - 2
Id like to give a huge shout out to both of the closing pitchers for the Rockies and the Mets. They managed to both give up three runs in the 9th inning which all but guaranteed that both teams snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
Series net unit record since May 01 : ( + 34 )
( A ) : 92 - 72 ( B ) : 31 - 40 ( C ) : 19 - 20 ( D ) : 9 - 11 ( E ) : 6 - 5 ( F ) : 3 - 2
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.