Messages

Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages Page 3 of 8 «  1 2 3 4 5   »
Author: [Systems & Strategies] Topic: mlb plus money system
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#51
Posted: 4/9/2012 6:56:09 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by bettor2win:

Love it JV! Keep it up sister!
Yes, would love if you posted each play as an a, b, c, or d bet. Gracious!



thought I knew how the picks were made. I guess not. I noticed from the pdf files that every team that qualify's isn't a play. do you have any ideas on how there picked?


quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#52
Posted: 4/9/2012 7:19:04 AM
looking over the pdf for 2005  only the underdogs were played from 135 to 195.
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#53
Posted: 4/9/2012 11:00:02 AM
posting plays for now chart coming up later today

april  9th  plays

cle  -113  -1.5
bal  139
tor  -114
oak -108
mia -136
cin -113
hou 155
quote
ERBATIZ send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ERBATIZ
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2135
Location: Texas
#54
Posted: 4/9/2012 11:30:20 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by jv040:

posting plays for now chart coming up later today

april  9th  plays

cle  -113  -1.5
bal  139
tor  -114
oak -108
mia -136
cin -113
hou 155
quote
Luckydan
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Luckydan
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 586
Location:
#55
Posted: 4/9/2012 11:36:54 AM
Why are MN +150 and SF +155 not A game plays? New series, both within the +135 to +195 parameters. I see Miami as a dog, thus a play also.

Good Luck
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#56
Posted: 4/9/2012 11:53:05 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Luckydan:

Why are MN +150 and SF +155 not A game plays? New series, both within the +135 to +195 parameters. I see Miami as a dog, thus a play also.

Good Luck


mn lost the last 3 games. I wasn't planning on playing every team that qualifyed. but try to pick the teams that have most likely a chance at winning the next 4 games. if I listed every team that qualifyed it might get real steep and I don't want to blow my bankroll and have to start over. on the other hand maybe it's just better to go with all the teams that qualify. whats your opinion. I didn't think a qualifing team had to be at the beginning of a series for first game but maybe wrong about this too.

quote
t8kitall send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
t8kitall
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Location:
#57
Posted: 4/9/2012 12:44:26 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by jv040:

 

For A bets = 1.5% of bankroll

For B bets = 3% of bankroll

For C bets = 4.5% of bankroll

For D bets = 6% of bankroll




 


Jv, is it starting bankroll or remaining bankroll..thx
quote
Luckydan
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Luckydan
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 586
Location:
#58
Posted: 4/9/2012 12:48:01 PM
Because one is playing only dogs, I am playing every one regardless of prior records. Because teams are playing poorly only gives you a better payout when they hit. I can control a dog system more than a high juice system with respect to money management. Your dog system has started off very well. It is doing better than the run line favorite system. While it could turn for the worse, I feel more confident in controlling my bankroll with it. If MN and SF split today, you would win at least half a unit. First time for them to be a dog of this size.  I hate to give up that chance.  If they both tank, I am willing to chase them. Both have very good managers and better talent than what they've shown so far. Beats chasing Houston, even though I would if the system dictates it. One man's opinion.

Good Luck.

quote
Shabazlyq send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
Shabazlyq
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 231
Location: United States
#59
Posted: 4/9/2012 1:52:18 PM
just like rc1 mentioned on page 2, this system has been out for a while and another poster (LasVegasSystems) dissected the hell out of it.

think about the point in a few weeks, when you have a couple d bets, a c bet, a few b bets, and a sprinkling of a. there are points, he explained,where youll lose about 60% of your bankroll in a couple days. THAT'S IDIOTIC. and like the great vanzack always says, chasing is for losers.

just tryin to help yall before you get knee deep in this. it happens far too often on this system&strategies section
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#60
Posted: 4/9/2012 1:54:20 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by t8kitall:



Jv, is it starting bankroll or remaining bankroll..thx



starting bankroll  according to the excel sheet from 2005. so 100$$ bankroll first bet would be 1.5 , b bet would be 3, c bet 4.5 d bet 6
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#61
Posted: 4/9/2012 1:57:09 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Luckydan:

Because one is playing only dogs, I am playing every one regardless of prior records. Because teams are playing poorly only gives you a better payout when they hit. I can control a dog system more than a high juice system with respect to money management. Your dog system has started off very well. It is doing better than the run line favorite system. While it could turn for the worse, I feel more confident in controlling my bankroll with it. If MN and SF split today, you would win at least half a unit. First time for them to be a dog of this size.  I hate to give up that chance.  If they both tank, I am willing to chase them. Both have very good managers and better talent than what they've shown so far. Beats chasing Houston, even though I would if the system dictates it. One man's opinion.

Good Luck.



I agree with you I think starting out on all teams that qualify isn't a bad idea at all. I'm going to include them on my chart later today.
quote
Shabazlyq send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
Shabazlyq
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 231
Location: United States
#62
Posted: 4/9/2012 2:12:26 PM
what lasvegassystems emailed me proving its worthlessness in 2010

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Anojo4_0kvDSdFhZNTQ1Nm1LdEJaSm1TREc0MzVDZlE
quote
Shabazlyq send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
Shabazlyq
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 231
Location: United States
#63
Posted: 4/9/2012 2:19:52 PM
this forum is meant to have cappers help cappers and i hate seeing cappers fall down this slippery slope of thinking a SYSTEM can get you to win BIG MONEY. ask any prominent professional handicapper on covers and they will all say this is bologna.
however on the note of systems, i do respect some of the consistent system creators on this forum like therizz and cisco and even neilsy
quote
ERBATIZ send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ERBATIZ
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2135
Location: Texas
#64
Posted: 4/9/2012 2:41:38 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Shabazlyq:

this forum is meant to have cappers help cappers and i hate seeing cappers fall down this slippery slope of thinking a SYSTEM can get you to win BIG MONEY. ask any prominent professional handicapper on covers and they will all say this is bologna.
however on the note of systems, i do respect some of the consistent system creators on this forum like therizz and cisco and even neilsy

i played almost the same sytem last year the 2h of the season i did very good playing the +underdogs
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#65
Posted: 4/9/2012 3:01:03 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Shabazlyq:

what lasvegassystems emailed me proving its worthlessness in 2010

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Anojo4_0kvDSdFhZNTQ1Nm1LdEJaSm1TREc0MzVDZlE


I payed for picks with this system in 2010 and I agree it didn't fair to well.  I was with jamesjones for a couple of weeks his pick selection was around  8 or 9  games at a time. I think luckydan is probably correct that if one is too picky and choses only 4 or 5 games out of everything that qualifys it could end up with really bad pick selection and lose any bankroll that was built up.
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#66
Posted: 4/9/2012 3:26:08 PM
tiny

http://tinyurl.com/7rkpsd2

game selection to be updated shortly
quote
ERBATIZ send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ERBATIZ
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2135
Location: Texas
#67
Posted: 4/9/2012 3:52:05 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by jv040:

tiny

http://tinyurl.com/7rkpsd2

game selection to be updated shortly


WOW this is great , my only doubt is washigton, yesterday was fav and lost and today is fav too and dont see it in the chart , thanks jvo40
quote
ERBATIZ send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ERBATIZ
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2135
Location: Texas
#68
Posted: 4/9/2012 3:53:37 PM
well wash line went to -104 not a play

quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#69
Posted: 4/9/2012 4:00:38 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Shabazlyq:

just like rc1 mentioned on page 2, this system has been out for a while and another poster (LasVegasSystems) dissected the hell out of it.

think about the point in a few weeks, when you have a couple d bets, a c bet, a few b bets, and a sprinkling of a. there are points, he explained,where youll lose about 60% of your bankroll in a couple days. THAT'S IDIOTIC. and like the great vanzack always says, chasing is for losers.

just tryin to help yall before you get knee deep in this. it happens far too often on this system&strategies section


just thinking about what your saying and I think this way if one game say like atl  does an   a  bet on  apr 4  and a b bet on apr 7 and  doesn't get to a c bet till may 7 then I think this is too long of a wait and probably would drop bets C and d and start over with  a bet on that team. as I tried to back track this system there were a few teams where c bet didn't come up for 2 or 3 weeks later I didn't skip any teams when I backtracked. I only got through the american league when I backtracked this.
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#70
Posted: 4/9/2012 4:16:28 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:

well wash line went to -104 not a play



my book doesn't have a -1.5 play on was not all day I checked more than once.
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#71
Posted: 4/9/2012 4:20:01 PM
my book has was on -1.5 they do now .I guess I could put it on the chart. I think most services go by covers opening lines. I thought closing lines might be more accurate.  could be wrong.
quote
ERBATIZ send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ERBATIZ
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2135
Location: Texas
#72
Posted: 4/9/2012 4:34:57 PM
[Quote: Originally Posted by jv040] my book has was on -1.5 they do now .I guess I could put it on the chart. I think most services go by covers opening lines. I thought closing lines might be more accurate.  could be wrong.


funny same thing happened to my yesterday with clevland,it was +1.5 so i did not play it
quote
t8kitall send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
t8kitall
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Location:
#73
Posted: 4/10/2012 12:24:26 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by jv040:




starting bankroll  according to the excel sheet from 2005. so 100$$ bankroll first bet would be 1.5 , b bet would be 3, c bet 4.5 d bet 6



quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#74
Posted: 4/10/2012 8:20:30 AM
I finally decided I'm going by 5dime opening lines when choosing teams to play.  covers goes by pinnacle but can't find pinnacle in the list when click on line moves to check opening lines.
quote
jv040 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
jv040
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: United States
#75
Posted: 4/10/2012 8:57:18 AM
I decided i'm listing all  A bets as a place of reference and not betting till B bet. this way I'm cutting down on the # of plays and my bankroll won't be so bogged down.  B bets will be 1 unit and C bets will be 2 units. D bets will be 3 units. this is just a suggestion and everyone can do A bets if they want to.
quote
Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages Page 3 of 8 «  1 2 3 4 5   »
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.