Messages

Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages Page 2 of 4  1 2 3 4  
Author: [Systems & Strategies] Topic: SUPERBOWL system for Frauds 100%
dawniewags send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dawniewags
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2524
Location: California
#26
Posted: 1/8/2011 8:15:52 PM

kreatue PACKERS are winning at Eagles thier defense will stop vick and eagles run game

it's going to be a sad day in philly  andy reids  1st time losing a 1st home playoff game

and Mike Vick will get smacked and proabably not finsih the game

Eagless too many rookies in at key defensive positions

PACKERS win in high scoring game

 

quote
dawniewags send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dawniewags
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2524
Location: California
#27
Posted: 1/16/2011 8:10:40 PM

BOTH frauds ELIMINATED BOTH #1 seeds  at HOME both were favored

GOT your attention now DON'T I !

falcons on a weak schedule only averaged +18 ypg more than all opponents

 

Patriots were at - 50 YDS per game most of saeson and wound up at -3 YPG  for 16 games

 

due to final game vs PHINS  and putting up 38 points  and 525 Yards  vs Phins  220

if Patriots played that way just half of saeson YOU wouldnt have seen happen what just happened

so steelers get home game in Finals are they happy now

but guess what they know THE JETS defense is damn good they just took the Colts and Patriots

I have to say steelers win a tight game again

i never even looked at JETS  averges per game of yards more than all opponents just that they had a very easy schehdule  at beginning of year and two OT wins @ Lions and Browns

BUT hey at laest they beat the Browns  LOL

 

quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#28
Posted: 1/16/2011 11:26:51 PM
So..........is it safe to say the Packers will be playing the Steelers in the SB?? If so who is going to win??
quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#29
Posted: 1/17/2011 1:19:57 AM

I just broke down the numbers.

JETS +59.31 - +9 T/O's (#25 INTS, #13 FF,#2 FR, #6 SCORING)

PITT+68.43 - +20 T/O's (#5 INTS, #2 FF, #5 FR, #1 SCORING)

BEARS -24.87 - +14 T/O's (#5 INTS, #6 FF, #5 FR, #4 SCORING)

PACK +49.06 - +6 T/O's (#2 INTS, #15 FF, #24 FR, #2 SCORING)

It is late, but I am pretty sure my numbers are correct.  So I would say the super bowl winner will either the be the Jets or Pitt.  I think the best matchup would be Jets/Pack for betting, I would assume the Pack would be the Favorite and the ML would be nice.  I hope this helps. 

 

quote
kreatture send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
kreatture
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2312
Location: Nova Scotia
#30
Posted: 1/17/2011 1:30:30 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by kreatture:

Steelers - Packers

GB +1640 to win the Show. Book it.. then hedge it starting next week. 

At least that's what I'm doin..



I hope someone took my advice here and is in line to make a nice payday.. now if only I can stick to a plan and take my own advice!
quote
RealityCheck1 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
RealityCheck1
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 529
Location:
#31
Posted: 1/17/2011 10:56:02 AM
Easy to post stuff after the games are over to make it look like your right.  You said Eagles for NFC... WRONG!!!  You said GB would be out because of 2 straight road games...  WRONG!!!!  Blah, Blah, Blah....  NFC champs coming out of the north is a longshot, well guess what!!!  Blah, Blah, Blah!!!
quote
dawniewags send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dawniewags
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2524
Location: California
#32
Posted: 1/17/2011 3:01:15 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by RealityCheck1:

Easy to post stuff after the games are over to make it look like your right.  You said Eagles for NFC... WRONG!!!  You said GB would be out because of 2 straight road games...  WRONG!!!!  Blah, Blah, Blah....  NFC champs coming out of the north is a longshot, well guess what!!!  Blah, Blah, Blah!!!

i never said GB would be out because of two st road games at end of season they played at home at end of year 3 road wins in playoffs is very possible and final roadie is like a short  trip to CHI.

THE gianst i said were impossible to get to the bowl because weeks 16 and 17 were on the road

they elimnated themseleves by losing to Eagles in agame they had in hand

still i doubt they would go far in playoffs with that high negative TO ratio

 

quote
dawniewags send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dawniewags
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2524
Location: California
#33
Posted: 1/17/2011 3:05:15 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by VegasSB:

I just broke down the numbers.

JETS +59.31 - +9 T/O's (#25 INTS, #13 FF,#2 FR, #6 SCORING)

PITT+68.43 - +20 T/O's (#5 INTS, #2 FF, #5 FR, #1 SCORING)

BEARS -24.87 - +14 T/O's (#5 INTS, #6 FF, #5 FR, #4 SCORING)

PACK +49.06 - +6 T/O's (#2 INTS, #15 FF, #24 FR, #2 SCORING)

It is late, but I am pretty sure my numbers are correct.  So I would say the super bowl winner will either the be the Jets or Pitt.  I think the best matchup would be Jets/Pack for betting, I would assume the Pack would be the Favorite and the ML would be nice.  I hope this helps. 

hmm ok i have to run the packers numbers for the 16 games season because i came up with +110 yards per game and PLUS 10 in TO's

steelers i think we have same

JETS i never did !

but realize the jets had a very weak schedule beginning of year all non playoff teams pre bye week and post bye week

but the sytem proved it self both #1 seeds were frauds and got whacked at home as favorites

quote
dj_destroyer send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
dj_destroyer
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3124
Location: Ontario
#34
Posted: 1/17/2011 3:22:04 PM
Dawnie... you have many posts that are way too obscure to comprehend. Is it that difficult to use proper punctuation? Try to be somewhat professional and maybe you'll get my attention. Until then, you post wayyyy to much incoherency for any of your posts to be legitimate. Collect your thoughts before you post, and then write them in logical order. You're literally all over the place. 
quote
dawniewags send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dawniewags
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2524
Location: California
#35
Posted: 1/17/2011 5:42:08 PM

ok dj destroyer i will try to do better 

any way   the final 4 teams in NFL  we have a BIG fraud

THE Bears  were - 8 YPG  for 16 games  in season worse than the Patriots who wound up - 3 ypg

this team will not be at Dallas on feb 6th !

was wondering why packers are favored @ Bears now i know

the bears beat no one in div round a team that wasnt supposed to be there

and a quick look at CHI. schedule shows why this team is a fake

10 games vs non playoff teams

BEARS are

JETS  are real  even tho they had a weak schedule

+59.5 YPG  and fair in +to's at +3

Packers i had an error but still strong

+50.3 YPG  +10 in TO's  however that PLUS 10 in to's came in one game vs NYG they got 5 to's from G men

Steelers  as always  the defense shines 

+64.5 YPG  and +17 in to's

so the correct teams are in the Finals

Bears got lucky to face Sehawks or they'd be gone vs any other NFC team

but who could have beaten them ?

Eagles fell apart  end of year  falcons were  fakes  as you saw what GB did to them

it's the way the cards fell for baers  but Packers will win at Baers by more than 3 points

this is the game Cutler goes kaboom !

Damn wish i took shot on GB to win bowl  when i took steelers +545   Packers were +1250 or sumthing like that

what a dream both longshots in the game couldnt lose

 

However  if it's steelers VS Packers i give edge to Steelers because they have players on team with superbowl winning experience

 

Packers full of rookies and only VET on team that has never been to a bowl is woodson just bad luck in playoffs 1 X with raiders 2 X with packers

also Driver never been to a bowl with GB

yes they meet the crteria for super bowl champs but when you have all 1st timers in vs another team that meets all the criteria

where 22 of those players wear multiple rings

IT's going to be tough for packers to win the game s/u

so also  beacuse the RUN game goes out the window for GB

that maens indoors air show  the bowl has to be high scoring

possibly second half more

HERE we go ..................

   1/4  mile left to finsih line

 

quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#36
Posted: 1/17/2011 11:46:34 PM

I will post my figures, game by game.  I looked up my stats on ESPN's website. 

This system is only valid in the SB, right??  So the numbers do not matter this week.  Also what happens if both teams in the SB are above the +35 yards??

Lastly, the ultimate match up in the SB for this system would be the Steelers/Jets vs the Bears.  I am predicting a Jets/Bears matchup in Dallas, and the Jets should be the dog.  JETS ML to the BANK!

quote
dj_destroyer send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
dj_destroyer
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3124
Location: Ontario
#37
Posted: 1/18/2011 2:50:40 AM
So dawnie, you're saying that GB and PIT wins? With PIT winning it all? I guess I can agree with that. Still don't know where your system from the first posts come in... but good luck!
quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#38
Posted: 1/24/2011 1:59:33 PM

I don't think this is accurate at all, just did some quick numbers over the past few years.

Giants +26.37 / -9 Take Aways vs Pats +122 / +16 Take Aways

Pitt +37.81 / +7 Take Aways vs Hawks +52.87 / +9 Take Aways

Pats +31 / +17 Take Aways vs Carolina +34.67 / -5 Take Aways

Bucs +59.88 / +17 Take Aways vs Oak +78.63 / +12 Take Aways

If you can explain why these didn't work out....??

 

quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#39
Posted: 1/24/2011 2:05:36 PM

This is the matchup for this year.

Pitt                                          GB

Total Offense 5525                  5730

Total Defense 4429                 4945

+1096 / 16 = +68.5                   +785 / 16 = +49.0625

DEFENSE RANKINGS

PITT - +17 T/O's (#5 INTS, #2 FF, #5 FR, #1 SCORING)

PACK - +10 T/O's (#2 INTS, #15 FF, #24 FR, #2 SCORING)

 

 

quote
longstah send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
longstah
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1901
Location: California
#40
Posted: 1/26/2011 10:24:33 AM

so this mean pitt will win right?

 

quote
dawniewags send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dawniewags
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2524
Location: California
#41
Posted: 1/27/2011 2:20:30 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by longstah:

so this mean pitt will win right?

 

longtsash all i know is that the same team that won two years ago is back with Steelers

the packers players are all replacements  and even the ones that were replaced NEVER EVER EVEN Been to a superbowl

Woodson the 12 yr vet in playoffs with raiders  LOST twice with packers in Playoffs LOST

other veterans on Packers Driver the WR never been to a superbowl !

 

Also watch NFL network i'm sure YOU will catch the reruns of former players talking about thier 1st superbowl experience

 

that they were so hyped up that by the time all the festivities pre game were over they were exhasted and the rest of the team also fill of 1st timers went kaboom !

also DO NOT compare last years Colts loss in the Bowl because that wasnt the same team that won way back in 06 7 or more players were gone and so was the HC !

COLTS did not meet the crteria for superbowl chamions they only averaged  20 ypg  more for 16 games in season

Saints averaged 45  ypg more than all 16 opponents plus #1 in scroing off of TO's  even tho defense was ranked 21 st

IT still stopped teams from scoring TD's

quote
dawniewags send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetJamaica.com |
dawniewags
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2524
Location: California
#42
Posted: 1/28/2011 8:15:11 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by VegasSB:

I don't think this is accurate at all, just did some quick numbers over the past few years.

Giants +26.37 / -9 Take Aways vs Pats +122 / +16 Take Aways

Pitt +37.81 / +7 Take Aways vs Hawks +52.87 / +9 Take Aways

Pats +31 / +17 Take Aways vs Carolina +34.67 / -5 Take Aways

Bucs +59.88 / +17 Take Aways vs Oak +78.63 / +12 Take Aways

If you can explain why these didn't work out....??

 

I can vegas but i cant tell YOU this info in public 

the information has proven itself for the past 44 superbowl winners

um if YOUR own my friends list i will give it to you free

BUT OMFG never realese it to anyone

I paid for this information two years ago got it cheap for $35 now the same guy charges $150  for the systems HE developed for sports handicapping

 

quote
Tuneman send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Tuneman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 85
Location: United States
#43
Posted: 11/22/2011 1:41:40 PM
Is anyone gonna track this for the 2012 SuperBowl? It worked like a charm last year
quote
Air1 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Air1
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 907
Location: United States
#44
Posted: 1/9/2012 4:05:20 PM
i guess no tracking of this system for the 11-12 season?
quote
juiciness send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
juiciness
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Location:
#45
Posted: 1/30/2012 9:08:45 PM
According to this system, both the Giants and Patriots shouldn't have made it

I have:
Giants at +8.7, +7 Turnovers (31 Takeaways - 24 Giveaways)
Patriots at +16.9, +17 Turnovers (34 Takeaways - 17 Giveaways)

The teams that had more than +35 yards or more were:
Atlanta Falcons +43
Baltimore Ravens +49.8
Houston Texans +86.4
New Orleans Saints +98.7
Philadelphia Eagles +74.2
Pittsburgh Steelers +74.2
San Diego Chargers +46.5
quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#46
Posted: 1/31/2012 12:00:06 AM
I get the same numbers, I am starting to notice that NY defense is pretty much just as bad as NE.  We could be in for another close low scoring game, with both teams trying to jocky for field position. 
quote
Tuneman send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Tuneman
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 85
Location: United States
#47
Posted: 11/5/2012 8:57:13 AM
Are we gonna pick this up this year? I like this strategy. Just found this thread again after two years.
quote
VegasSB send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
VegasSB
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 218
Location: Michigan
#48
Posted: 12/18/2012 11:00:18 PM
Anyone do the numbers on this yet?
quote
DegenGamble send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
DegenGamble
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1052
Location: New Jersey
#49
Posted: 12/19/2012 2:40:05 PM
quote
cheif send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
cheif
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 42
Location:
#50
Posted: 12/25/2012 8:46:02 AM
Let's do this!!
quote
Forum Index : Systems & Strategies : Messages Page 2 of 4  1 2 3 4  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.