Posted: 12/21/2013 2:10:20 AM
JDaggz in one sense I agree w u, im a boston guy and die hard hockey fan, in matchups like this where ML is 265 I always lay off & instead typically look long n hard at puck line & risk less $$ & hope for a 2 goal dominating win, problem w my bruins currently is they are missing 6 guys off the starting 20 line up, yes its revenge but this isn't the veteran heavy deep 4 line team right now & the D is missing 2 top six D so the chemistry through out is non existant, from the break out in D zone to the penalty kill to the power play, its all a little off, krejci lucic iggy have carried this team, along w chara & boychuk & sidenburg but these guys can only be on the ice so much, I wouldn't risk taking the ML on this game because the risk is too high, the under makes me nervous because our young guys don't communicate like the starting vets & are less responsible defensively giving up tons of uncharacteristic odd man rushes, the only angle for me on this is the puck line, which my book has not released yet, if I take anything its that for small $$ small risk high reward.......
bruins puck line (small)
I really like pitt & puck line, Calgary ending a lengthy road trip visiting pitt who is getting contributions from the less known guys picking up slack for that *ussy liar neil & malkin
pitt puck line large