Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012)

Forum: Pro Football Page 5 of 6 «  2 3 4 5 6   »
Author: [Pro Football] Topic: Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012)
GordoPockets PM GordoPockets
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 277
United States
 
GordoPockets
Participation Meter
quote#101
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:13:24 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by booyahz123:


another moron speaks.  My take on this game is accurate, maybe you should just sit this one out and watch

I completely agree with you... That logic makes perfect sense and is the reason I'm also taking Oakland. 

Cheers!
booyahz123 PM booyahz123
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1668
Pennsylvania
 
booyahz123
Participation Meter
quote#102
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:15:25 PM
under is the easy play


Luckyleo1 PM Luckyleo1
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 50
 
Luckyleo1
Participation Meter
quote#103
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:18:16 PM
so many experts on this site.37-6 the first time out. whats to think about denver minus ten over 48. unless im missing something this is easy money. by the way they are still playing for home field.over is money also.
easypics PM easypics
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2635
Christmas
              Islands
 
easypics
Participation Meter
quote#104
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:18:24 PM

        Nwhere To Hide . . . 

  As bad as Raiders n' Vuepicks are, All bad things must come to an end.

 I think . . .

Raiders have luxury of catching Traveling Broncs on short week which factors heavily on tonite's spread outcome.
As for Vue's data , action,prime and new and improved comment ? play gimmicks, let's just say he's due.
For tonite's game, One fact stands clear to be considered : Peyton Manning is physically not 100 % fit and by now,
everyone should be familiar with Coach Fox's veteran's wise ways , knowing he will absolutely NOT take the risk of injury or fatiguing Peyton Manning via pass attack on short rest.

Would be like Girardi pushing Andy Petite on 2 days rest with playoffs around the corner.
Raiders have no defense ranked 28 th, allowing 131 yrds rushing per game , which will allow 
 Broncs to stick to a conservative,run and grind type of game plan allowing Denver's D ranked 3 rd in the league to control the pace vs Ineffective Raiders O that only could score 6 points @ Denver with a healthy Mc Fadden earlier this year.

As far as meaning of this game.It's truly unbelievable that anybody in this forum can even suggest this game has little importance for Denver.
Whoever believes such BS ,should really not be gambling, less it be quarter bets , lol , as some do.

Denver is tied for 2 nd seed with Ravens + Pats and will be hell bent to win out , securing  first round bye ,doing everything to avoid playing @ Baltimore ,where Ravens DOMINATE. Ironically Broncs will be playing Ravens next week ,so this is a must win for them in order to try to secure HUGE advantage of playing @ Mile High and perhaps less importantly go for divisional sweep with only Chiefs standing in the way after Raiders tonite for perfect division record.

Could be wrong but Fox would be out of his mind to unleash Peyton towards back to back 300 + yrds on only three days rest.
Denver's D n' Running game will dictate clock while Raiders may hit 16 Pt plateau.

BRONCOS 26  RAIDERS 16
BOLA

Lovin$ the Under


               
chuckles394 PM chuckles394
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1285
Ontario
 
chuckles394
Participation Meter
quote#105
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:21:34 PM
Look for the Raiders to run the ball and milk the clock, keeping Manning off the field. Denver wins but "DO NOT" cover the spread.Just another example of the public gambling community not taking into account other factors that affect this game.I will be waiting for line to move up and then be big on Raiders to cover.
SportsPredictor PM SportsPredictor
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 688
Massachusetts
 
SportsPredictor
Participation Meter
quote#106
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:21:43 PM
QUOTE

QUOTE Originally Posted by Brzfan:

Originally Posted by Dogs-run-wild:

Just how do they score 19 points in a football game?

A touchdown with extra point and a field goal = 10 pts.  

A Safety = 2 pts.  Then, a touchdown and extra point = 19 pts.

Also, a touchdown with extra point and four field goals = 19 pts.

Also, five field goals scored, and two safeties = 19 pts.

Probably many other ways LOL  Hope this helps 

RedStick PM RedStick
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 750
Louisiana
 
RedStick
Participation Meter
quote#107
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:25:22 PM
Oakland has the 28th ranked D in the league, while Denver has the 3rd best D.  DD home dog, short week, division rivals, I get it, but damn the Raiders are just plain terrible most of the time.  

My humble little capping program puts the # @ -12 and for me that's to close to call.    

zzziggy PM zzziggy
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 298
Wisconsin
 
zzziggy
Participation Meter
quote#108
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:46:08 PM
21 out of 22 seems like its worth for a 1 unit play

Might as well hedge with the Under since its Thurs and I always play the

1.Dogs
2.Home Teams
3.Under

MoneyTalks789 PM MoneyTalks789
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1719
Massachusetts
 
MoneyTalks789
Participation Meter
quote#109
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:50:59 PM
cant remember the last time manning turned the ball over ..raiders seem to turn it over everyday . sure 10 looks sweet heck even 13 , but turnovers is so cruicial palmer could easily turn it over 3-4 times @ his own 20 giving denver the reigns
CANTFAZEME PM CANTFAZEME
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 40
California
 
CANTFAZEME
Participation Meter
quote#110
Posted: 12/6/2012 5:56:06 PM
RAIDERS AND UND!!!!! LOCKED AND LOADED!!!!
apgreatest PM apgreatest
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 33
United States
 
apgreatest
Participation Meter
quote#111
Posted: 12/6/2012 6:00:21 PM
My play is den -7 at the half 
jmoney33 PM jmoney33
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
 
jmoney33
Participation Meter
quote#112
Posted: 12/6/2012 6:02:37 PM

teased denver -4.5 over 42 and over 48

TheTwisted PM TheTwisted
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 36
Nevada
 
TheTwisted
Participation Meter
quote#113
Posted: 12/6/2012 6:19:26 PM
I am to rolling with Denver @ -10.5
They have burnt me several times on these larger spreads, but Oakland doesn't have much of a defense.

On the other topic of buying points, I have no problem with buying the hook, but never buying more than that. If I am placing a real money bet, I expect that team to cover. If I buy the hook, its just a little insurance.
Posted using a mobile device.
Sammy_Ace PM Sammy_Ace
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 296
New York
 
Sammy_Ace
Participation Meter
quote#114
Posted: 12/6/2012 6:24:29 PM
Takin da raiders!!!
jo14014 PM jo14014
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4739
United States
 
jo14014
Participation Meter
quote#115
Posted: 12/6/2012 6:32:20 PM

Broncos 28

Raiders 17

 

 

babygus17 PM babygus17
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Michigan
 
babygus17
Participation Meter
quote#116
Posted: 12/6/2012 6:37:15 PM
oakland will look to run clock "play keep away" teasing them with under
W8LIFTER PM W8LIFTER
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5876
Texas
 
W8LIFTER
Participation Meter
quote#117
Posted: 12/6/2012 7:02:10 PM
Denver/Oakland UNDER 48LARGE
bleedblackngold PM bleedblackngold
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 39
Pennsylvania
 
bleedblackngold
Participation Meter
quote#118
Posted: 12/6/2012 7:40:52 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by DrDogs:

The doc had the chiefs in the last double digit home underdog adventure. Cant believe there's another one so close together. Put your largest large on OAK!!!! 
Lol peyton manning is going to show the world why he's the top 2 qb's in the NFL and fight for a top seed by blowing the jock straps off the horrible disgraceful raiders. The chiefs played Carolina and had a ton of heart to play w that game. Denver for the small b/c there is always wayyyy easier picks when you have 11 matchups or so on Sunday......Holla
Buddhabud PM Buddhabud
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 433
Georgia
 
Buddhabud
Participation Meter
quote#119
Posted: 12/6/2012 7:44:25 PM
Dont see Oakland scoreing more than 14-17pts and Denver is good for at least 27to30pts.Go PeytonGleout
simon_says PM simon_says
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 109
United States
 
simon_says
Participation Meter
quote#120
Posted: 12/6/2012 7:52:17 PM
simon_says:

DENVER -10 
UNDER 48 
binger1 PM binger1
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 549
Missouri
 
binger1
Participation Meter
quote#121
Posted: 12/6/2012 8:09:55 PM
Well, i posted on this thread earlier this week how i've been betting on denver the last 3 wks (2loss 1 push) and was undecided on this divisional matchup .Yea i know that dog stat about the 22-2 ats,but couldnt' still make up my mind..So i did sumthin I rarely do and paid a capper for his pick for tonights game(+army/navy game for free) and his pick was.......denver -10  the guys on a 11-2 run in the nfl. So there you go,hope this helps if you wer teetering on the fence as well.BEST OF LUCK AND GO BRONCO'S
SportsPredictor PM SportsPredictor
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 688
Massachusetts
 
SportsPredictor
Participation Meter
quote#122
Posted: 12/6/2012 8:18:56 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by booyahz123:

some of you people are a joke with posting waste of money teasers.  grow some balls and make a real pick and bet.  teasers are a waste of time and money, a fools bet thats why they have them.  You cant pick teasers on here for these contest either so why post that kind of stupid betting.

 Dont see DEN doing more than running the ball on a short week against a team like OAK.  under 48 and take the points, everyone betting DEN like they need to win big.  Manning is not going to come out throw 40 times on a short week at his age in a game that really means nothing to them

+10.5 and under 48  24-16 DEN

Thanks for the confirmation on those "teaser" rip-offs booyahz123!  Thought is was me!  I only go "straight up" bets with small 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8-Team Parlays!

But the "straight up" bets is where I make the best money.  Even parlays (let alone "teasers") are hard to connect.  Checked those teaser rules out, and ran away fast!  Thanks, but no thanks!  Thanks again for your intelligent insight!

BOL   

SIMADMAN PM SIMADMAN
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 554
Illinois
 
SIMADMAN
Participation Meter
quote#123
Posted: 12/6/2012 8:32:13 PM

[Quote: Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace] Takin da raiders!!!

Im with Sammy, I think Raiders will play up here in this spot. +10 @ home division game.

BOL!!!

SportsPredictor PM SportsPredictor
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 688
Massachusetts
 
SportsPredictor
Participation Meter
quote#124
Posted: 12/6/2012 8:40:00 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by binger1:

Well, i posted on this thread earlier this week how i've been betting on denver the last 3 wks (2loss 1 push) and was undecided on this divisional matchup .Yea i know that dog stat about the 22-2 ats,but couldnt' still make up my mind..So i did sumthin I rarely do and paid a capper for his pick for tonights game(+army/navy game for free) and his pick was.......denver -10  the guys on a 11-2 run in the nfl. So there you go,hope this helps if you wer teetering on the fence as well.BEST OF LUCK AND GO BRONCO'S

Best of Luck for you this time binger1!  Mentioned you in my above post on page 3, post # 59.  I decided not to touch the game for the reasons in my post...but hope you can make up for your two losses.

GL to You          

UHQB PM UHQB
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2841
Nevada
 
UHQB
Participation Meter
quote#125
Posted: 12/6/2012 8:48:50 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by SportsPredictor:

Can't argue with a confident man UHQB!  I've seen many of your picks on covers...and they're damn good!  I won't have a dog in this fight, so all on Denver or Oakland, I wish Good Luck.

BOL                         

I've been following you also SportsPredictor. Your Goldsheet picks are pretty darn good. I would believe that you were writing for them the way you analyze the games.

Noticed Denver went right down and scored easily?

 

Forum: Pro Football Page 5 of 6 «  2 3 4 5 6   »
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.