| Author: |
[Pro Football] Topic: Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012) |
|
GordoPockets |
RSI   View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 46
Location: United States |
#101 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:13:24 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by booyahz123:
another moron speaks. My take on this game is accurate, maybe you should just sit this one out and watch
I completely agree with you... That logic makes perfect sense and is the reason I'm also taking Oakland.
Cheers! |
|
quote |
|
booyahz123 |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1637
Location: Pennsylvania |
#102 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:15:25 PM
|
|
quote |
|
Luckyleo1 |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 50
Location: |
#103 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:18:16 PM  |
|
quote |
|
easypics |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2248
Location: Christmas
Islands |
#104 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:18:24 PM
N where To Hide . . .
As bad as Raiders n' Vuepicks are, All bad things must come to an end.
I think . . .
Raiders have luxury of catching Traveling Broncs on short week which factors heavily on tonite's spread outcome. As for Vue's data , action,prime and new and improved comment ? play gimmicks, let's just say he's due. For tonite's game, One fact stands clear to be considered : Peyton Manning is physically not 100 % fit and by now, everyone should be familiar with Coach Fox's veteran's wise ways , knowing he will absolutely NOT take the risk of injury or fatiguing Peyton Manning via pass attack on short rest.
Would be like Girardi pushing Andy Petite on 2 days rest with playoffs around the corner. Raiders have no defense ranked 28 th, allowing 131 yrds rushing per game , which will allow Broncs to stick to a conservative,run and grind type of game plan allowing Denver's D ranked 3 rd in the league to control the pace vs Ineffective Raiders O that only could score 6 points @ Denver with a healthy Mc Fadden earlier this year.
As far as meaning of this game.It's truly unbelievable that anybody in this forum can even suggest this game has little importance for Denver. Whoever believes such BS ,should really not be gambling, less it be quarter bets , lol , as some do.
Denver is tied for 2 nd seed with Ravens + Pats and will be hell bent to win out , securing first round bye ,doing everything to avoid playing @ Baltimore ,where Ravens DOMINATE. Ironically Broncs will be playing Ravens next week ,so this is a must win for them in order to try to secure HUGE advantage of playing @ Mile High and perhaps less importantly go for divisional sweep with only Chiefs standing in the way after Raiders tonite for perfect division record.
Could be wrong but Fox would be out of his mind to unleash Peyton towards back to back 300 + yrds on only three days rest. Denver's D n' Running game will dictate clock while Raiders may hit 16 Pt plateau.
BRONCOS 26 RAIDERS 16 BOLA
Lovin$ the Under
|
|
quote |
|
chuckles394 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 48
Location: Ontario |
#105 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:21:34 PM |
|
quote |
|
|
|
SportsPredictor |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 213
Location: Massachusetts |
#106 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:21:43 PM QUOTEQUOTE Originally Posted by Brzfan:
Originally Posted by Dogs-run-wild:
Just how do they score 19 points in a football game?
A touchdown with extra point and a field goal = 10 pts.
A Safety = 2 pts. Then, a touchdown and extra point = 19 pts.
Also, a touchdown with extra point and four field goals = 19 pts.
Also, five field goals scored, and two safeties = 19 pts.
Probably many other ways LOL Hope this helps  |
|
quote |
|
RedStick |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 162
Location: Louisiana |
#107 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:25:22 PM
My humble little capping program puts the # @ -12 and for me that's to close to call.
|
|
quote |
|
zzziggy |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 62
Location: Wisconsin |
#108 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:46:08 PM
Might as well hedge with the Under since its Thurs and I always play the
1.Dogs
2.Home Teams
3.Under
|
|
quote |
|
MoneyTalks789 |
RSI  |
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 522
Location: Florida |
#109 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:50:59 PM |
|
quote |
|
CANTFAZEME |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 38
Location: California |
#110 Posted: 12/6/2012 5:56:06 PM
|
|
quote |
|
apgreatest |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.com | |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
Location: United States |
#111 Posted: 12/6/2012 6:00:21 PM  |
|
quote |
|
jmoney33 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Location: |
#112 Posted: 12/6/2012 6:02:37 PM teased denver -4.5 over 42 and over 48 |
|
quote |
|
TheTwisted |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 29
Location: Nevada |
#113 Posted: 12/6/2012 6:19:26 PM
They have burnt me several times on these larger spreads, but Oakland doesn't have much of a defense.
On the other topic of buying points, I have no problem with buying the hook, but never buying more than that. If I am placing a real money bet, I expect that team to cover. If I buy the hook, its just a little insurance. |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
Sammy_Ace |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 188
Location: New York |
#114 Posted: 12/6/2012 6:24:29 PM |
|
quote |
|
jo14014 |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2835
Location: United States |
#115 Posted: 12/6/2012 6:32:20 PM Broncos 28
Raiders 17
|
|
quote |
|
babygus17 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sportsbook.com | |
Prospect
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 231
Location: Michigan |
#116 Posted: 12/6/2012 6:37:15 PM |
|
quote |
|
W8LIFTER |
RSI  |
Captain
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5524
Location: Texas |
#117 Posted: 12/6/2012 7:02:10 PM  LARGE |
|
quote |
|
bleedblackngold |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 37
Location: Pennsylvania |
#118 Posted: 12/6/2012 7:40:52 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by DrDogs:
The doc had the chiefs in the last double digit home underdog adventure. Cant believe there's another one so close together. Put your largest large on OAK!!!! Lol peyton manning is going to show the world why he's the top 2 qb's in the NFL and fight for a top seed by blowing the jock straps off the horrible disgraceful raiders. The chiefs played Carolina and had a ton of heart to play w that game. Denver for the small b/c there is always wayyyy easier picks when you have 11 matchups or so on Sunday......Holla |
|
quote |
|
Buddhabud |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 288
Location: Georgia |
#119 Posted: 12/6/2012 7:44:25 PM   Gle out |
|
quote |
|
simon_says |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 109
Location: United States |
#120 Posted: 12/6/2012 7:52:17 PM
|
|
quote |
|
binger1 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 489
Location: Missouri |
#121 Posted: 12/6/2012 8:09:55 PM |
|
quote |
|
SportsPredictor |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 213
Location: Massachusetts |
#122 Posted: 12/6/2012 8:18:56 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by booyahz123: some of you people are a joke with posting waste of money teasers. grow some balls and make a real pick and bet. teasers are a waste of time and money, a fools bet thats why they have them. You cant pick teasers on here for these contest either so why post that kind of stupid betting.
Dont see DEN doing more than running the ball on a short week against a team like OAK. under 48 and take the points, everyone betting DEN like they need to win big. Manning is not going to come out throw 40 times on a short week at his age in a game that really means nothing to them
+10.5 and under 48 24-16 DEN
Thanks for the confirmation on those "teaser" rip-offs booyahz123! Thought is was me! I only go "straight up" bets with small 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8-Team Parlays!
But the "straight up" bets is where I make the best money. Even parlays (let alone "teasers") are hard to connect. Checked those teaser rules out, and ran away fast! Thanks, but no thanks! Thanks again for your intelligent insight!
BOL |
|
quote |
|
SIMADMAN |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 103
Location: United States |
#123 Posted: 12/6/2012 8:32:13 PM [Quote: Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace] Takin da raiders!!!
Im with Sammy, I think Raiders will play up here in this spot. +10 @ home division game.
BOL!!! |
|
quote |
|
SportsPredictor |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 213
Location: Massachusetts |
#124 Posted: 12/6/2012 8:40:00 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by binger1:
Well, i posted on this thread earlier this week how i've been betting on denver the last 3 wks (2loss 1 push) and was undecided on this divisional matchup .Yea i know that dog stat about the 22-2 ats,but couldnt' still make up my mind..So i did sumthin I rarely do and paid a capper for his pick for tonights game(+army/navy game for free) and his pick was.......denver -10 the guys on a 11-2 run in the nfl. So there you go,hope this helps if you wer teetering on the fence as well.BEST OF LUCK AND GO BRONCO'S
Best of Luck for you this time binger1! Mentioned you in my above post on page 3, post # 59. I decided not to touch the game for the reasons in my post...but hope you can make up for your two losses.
GL to You  |
|
quote |
|
UHQB |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1643
Location: Nevada |
#125 Posted: 12/6/2012 8:48:50 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by SportsPredictor:
Can't argue with a confident man UHQB! I've seen many of your picks on covers...and they're damn good! I won't have a dog in this fight, so all on Denver or Oakland, I wish Good Luck.
BOL
I've been following you also SportsPredictor. Your Goldsheet picks are pretty darn good. I would believe that you were writing for them the way you analyze the games.
Noticed Denver went right down and scored easily?
|
|
quote |