Messages

Forum Index : Pro Football : Messages Page 3 of 6 «  1 2 3 4 5   »
Author: [Pro Football] Topic: Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012)
NoFrigginWay send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
NoFrigginWay
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 233
Location:
#51
Posted: 12/5/2012 7:21:47 PM
SORRY VUE I DID'NT READ YOUR WHOLE ANALYSIS.......DENVER IS ON THE ROAD ,AND AGAINST A HOSTILE DIVISIONAL OPPONENT....................HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA NO garbage VUE !!!! "BUT IF THEY CAN WIN,AND ESCAPE WITHOUT INJURIES,THEN AS FAR AS THEY'RE CONCERNED A 2 OR 5 POINT WIN IS A WIN " ...............LMFAO !!!!!!
DUDE...SORRY YOU IS DUMB AS DUMB CAN BE ! 
quote
NoFrigginWay send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
NoFrigginWay
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 233
Location:
#52
Posted: 12/5/2012 7:25:24 PM
LMFAO !! CENSOR ALERT !!!!! GARBAGE ....S H I A T.....SAME S.H . T !!!!!!!!!
quote
mak104 send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
mak104
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 96
Location:
#53
Posted: 12/5/2012 8:01:32 PM
Raiders have dropped 5 in a row ATS.
quote
best_bets send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
best_bets
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3671
Location: United States
#54
Posted: 12/5/2012 8:05:39 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by mlp33181:

I am a die hard Broncos fan & watch every game but I'm just going with the trend here. Double digit DIVISIONAL home underdogs have covered 21 of the last 22. I mean everyone that is saying the Broncos will blow them out from the beginning, have you even watched the Broncos this year?!?!?!? The Broncos are a 2nd half team! During their current 7 game winning streak, they have trailed in 6 of those games & in the first meeting it was only 10-6 at halftime until Denver exploded in the 3rd quarter. John Fox is GREAT at halftime adjustments but the Broncos have played very sluggish in the first half in nearly all their games this year & it is going to catch up with them again like it did in the beginning of the season. Most people thought the Broncos would cover in KC but they didn't because Prater is struggling & missed 2 field goals. With a huge game in Baltimore next week I expect Denver to not take the Raiders as serious as they should. Broncos will definitely win but I got Oakland +10.5 & the under
So, you have watched your team reel off 7 in a row and now you are going to take the points and the Raiders............it's what true fans do right?????......bet against their team.............true fan. I am a fan as well duh and when I don't like them in a situation I don't play them. I like this situation. Denver
quote
best_bets send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
best_bets
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3671
Location: United States
#55
Posted: 12/5/2012 8:12:55 PM
If Denver let's this thing stay close it would give no merit to them being a serious Super Bowl contender. Is that the way they want to be perceived as WEAK? So what do you think?
quote
best_bets send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
best_bets
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3671
Location: United States
#56
Posted: 12/5/2012 8:17:52 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:

I trust in the Doctor here. The books are in a bind here. They know they have to set the line at atleast 10 points because every Joe Public in the world will make Denver as one leg of their 3-game teasers.

I have nothing productive to say about Oakland, other than they are probably the play here. This nationally televised game should be like their Super Bowl. Plus they just lost to the Browns at home. Things can't get much worse.

Yes, unfortunately, they can......for Raider backers. If I were a bookie I'd give you Raiders +13 @ +130
quote
SportsPredictor
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
SportsPredictor
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 323
Location: Massachusetts
#57
Posted: 12/5/2012 8:34:10 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by NoFrigginWay:


OMG WHAT IGNORANT DRIVEL !!!! LMFAO!!!! "THIS IS YOUR TURF-BETTER THAN THIS-A 10.5 UNDERDOG AT HOME.AGAIN IT HAS TO DO WITH PLAYER PSYCHOLOGY" ? ??LMFAO!!!!"IF THEY DONT MEET RESISTANCE-THEYLL CRUCIFY OAKLAND" ? LMFAO!!!!!!!DUDE, FOR BEGINNERS THIS FORUM IS ABOUT MAKING MONEY !!! SO WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ??? YOU ARE ONE OF THE WORST VUE !!! YOUR COLLEGE PICKS ARE DREADFUL AND YOUR NFL PICKS ARE ABYSMAL !!!  YOUR DATA ? LMFAO!!!!YOUR COMBINED COLLEGE AND NFL PICKS PUTS YOU OVERALL AT 39 % !!! YOUR NFL PICKS ARE AT 44 % !!! DUDE YOURE NO HANDICAPPER,WHO YOU TRYING TO FOOL ??? " I TRY AN ALL AROUND APPROACH AND RELY ON MORE OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS" OMG LOSING APPROACH FOR SURE!!!  EVER CROSSED YOUR MIND IF YOU WERE A GOOD HANDICAPPER  AS SOME ARE ON THIS FORUM THAT YOU WOULD NOT BE GETTING  BLASTED FOR YOUR IGNORANCE AND LOSING PICKS ! OMG ARE YOU NEAR SIGHTED ? QUITE A LOSING STREAK YOURE ON DUDE !!!!LIKE HELLO !!!!"YES DENVER-WITH MANNING IS QUITE GOODS" ????? OMG DUDE !!!!NOW FOR THIS GAME ,BEFORE YOU LOOSE ANOTHER 25 CENTS,DO KNOW THAT TIM TEBOW AND BRONCOS CRUSHED CARSON PALMER RAIDERS IN OAKLAND LAST YEAR 38-24 AND OAKLAND LOST BY 10 AT HOME TO BUCANEERS AND BY 21 TO SAINTS AT HOME !!!

ROFL  "Before you lose another 25 cents"    

They keep me laughing for weeks  

quote
Sammy_Ace send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Sammy_Ace
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 293
Location: New York
#58
Posted: 12/5/2012 9:06:22 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by best_bets:

Yes, unfortunately, they can......for Raider backers. If I were a bookie I'd give you Raiders +13 @ +130

Maybe your right about the Raiders. I think the return of McFadden would be a much needed boost because they have looked dreadful without him. To be honest, I don't think they've won a game without him since the injury. Picking up Palmer last year was such a mistake too. He is so immobile and is so hit or miss. 
I love the Doctor's angle regarding double digit divisional home dogs, and you are certainly betting with the house by taking Oakland. But as they say, there's a fine line between being a genius and a jackass. 
Still have to give it some thought...might be a game time decision tomorrow. For me, it's Oakland or no play at all. My inner wise guy would never allow me to take Denver in this spot. 
quote
SportsPredictor
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
SportsPredictor
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 323
Location: Massachusetts
#59
Posted: 12/5/2012 9:26:50 PM

Gold Sheet Runs with "Suspicious" Denver:

Denver 32 at Oakland 15  "Any takers for Oakland? Raiders' SU and spread losing streak...now at 5, with rumors that Mark Davis might channel his late papa AL and hit the "eject" button on first-year HC Dennis Allen, whose familiarity with former employer Denver (where he was defensive coordinator LY) sure didn't help in Oakland's 36-6 loss at Invesco Field Sept. 30.

Leaky Raider secondary (24 TDP allowed) becomes even bigger liability vs. on-fire Peyton Manning, who was 30 for 39 for 338 YP in the first meeting, when he had enough time in the pocket to film another Buick commercial.  Denver remains motivated for chance at first-round playoff bye.  TV--NFL NETWORK"

That's nice. Real nice.  But "on-fire" Manning now 0-3 vs. point spread last three games.  And Peyton Manning passing for 995 yards and putting up six touchdowns in one game, isn't worth a nickel in Chinese money.  If Denver was a 38 point favorite, the only thing that matters is them winning the game by 39 points!  True, Manning might bury the spread tomorrow night by 27 points, but I won't be watching to find out.

Binger1's comment above is 100% correct!  She was even brave enough to say she lost both games on Denver, something only one in 50,000 people are willing to do.  And both of those games were suspicious!  Denver was "frozen solid" for two hours at 17 to 9 in the KC game...and the game ended right there, two points under the spread!  I feel for binger1 because she had her hard-earned money stolen from her...as far as I'm concerned!

And with San Diego, Denver "froze itself solid" at 31 points. And with less than two minutes in the game, San Diego scored a touchdown and covered the spread...by one half of a point.  Denver favored by 7.5 lost by exactly 7 points. 

Respectfully disagree with mgmprofits in post #43, above, that it's 100% fixed.  But mgmprofits no "conspiracy theorist."  He knows exactly what he's talking about!  And there are two, three or four teams that must be put on a "No Bet" list. And Denver's one of them.

Vegas line people don't carry football lines in one hand and Bibles in the other.  Their goal is to take the public down for tens of billions of dollars.  And a sports bettor's goal is to dodge their bullets, and try to pick winners.  And that's not easy.

 

BOL to ALL                    

 

quote
Dogs-run-wild send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Dogs-run-wild
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2
Location:
#60
Posted: 12/5/2012 9:31:32 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Brnzfan:

Just how do they score 19 points in a football game?
quote
best_bets send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
best_bets
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3671
Location: United States
#61
Posted: 12/5/2012 9:33:01 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:


Maybe your right about the Raiders. I think the return of McFadden would be a much needed boost because they have looked dreadful without him. To be honest, I don't think they've won a game without him since the injury. Picking up Palmer last year was such a mistake too. He is so immobile and is so hit or miss. 
I love the Doctor's angle regarding double digit divisional home dogs, and you are certainly betting with the house by taking Oakland. But as they say, there's a fine line between being a genius and a jackass. 
Still have to give it some thought...might be a game time decision tomorrow. For me, it's Oakland or no play at all. My inner wise guy would never allow me to take Denver in this spot. 
Angle shmangle.......Sammy, I no play saves you money. Cmon man!
quote
THE_PUNISHER
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
THE_PUNISHER
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 197
Location: Texas
#62
Posted: 12/5/2012 10:20:03 PM
who's it gonna be, winners people. we need winners in here, nothing more and nothing less.
quote
CRS
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
CRS
Participation Meter
Captain
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5396
Location: New Jersey
#63
Posted: 12/5/2012 10:54:59 PM

DENVER ML   OAKLAND +101/2   

 

                       

quote
Adamngo send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
Adamngo
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 133
Location:
#64
Posted: 12/5/2012 11:01:20 PM
Oakland large Denver just play enought to win the game they need to rest their players for playoff they don't want P manning to get hurt. 7 or more I take Oakland.
quote
forkball
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
forkball
Participation Meter
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 557
Location: Cayman Islands
#65
Posted: 12/5/2012 11:02:33 PM
quote
vue21849
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
vue21849
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2979
Location: South Carolina
#66
Posted: 12/5/2012 11:13:58 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by NoFrigginWay:

SORRY VUE I DID'NT READ YOUR WHOLE ANALYSIS.......DENVER IS ON THE ROAD ,AND AGAINST A HOSTILE DIVISIONAL OPPONENT....................HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA NO garbage VUE !!!! "BUT IF THEY CAN WIN,AND ESCAPE WITHOUT INJURIES,THEN AS FAR AS THEY'RE CONCERNED A 2 OR 5 POINT WIN IS A WIN " ...............LMFAO !!!!!!
DUDE...SORRY YOU IS DUMB AS DUMB CAN BE ! 

One time behind bars, and you still haven't smartened up. Wasn't me, that send you up the creek either. I seen you like a little wuss crying to the Covers referees- They're picking on me- wahh!!!!!!!!!! Instead of coming on here and bashing everyone, start contributing something to this site- if you can. Man , you're lame.

quote
NoFrigginWay send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
NoFrigginWay
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 233
Location:
#67
Posted: 12/6/2012 12:12:15 AM
OMG STILL CANT GET IT INSIDE THAT PIGSKINNED HEAD OF YOURS !?!?!? YOUR INSIGHT  LMAO IS AS LAME AS YOUR PICKS!!!!WERE HERE TO MAKE MONEY AND ALL YOU DO IS LOSE MONEY !!!LET THE REAL HANDICAPPERS ON THIS SITE DO THEIR THING DUDE  AND YOU SURE AS HELL AINT EVERYONE !!!!LMFAO !!!!YOU DONT SEE ME CALLING OUT ANYBODY ELSE BUT YOU AND SOMETIMES W8MEATHEAD WHO THANK GOODNESS DOES NOT MAKE AS BIG OF AN A S S AS YOURSELF WITH LAME TO NONE INPUT!!!!   LARGE     THAT'S LAME!!! AS LAME AS HAVING MULTIPLE PSEUDOS WHICH EXPLAINS WHY YOU WERE BANNED BEFORE !!!!LMAO
quote
NFLKiller
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
NFLKiller
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 328
Location: Illinois
#68
Posted: 12/6/2012 2:27:23 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by rarafromphilly:

I THINK I WILL BUY IT DOWN TO -9.5.



FINALLY, a smart thinker.  
I put $5k wins $4k (-120)
DENVER -9.5
quote
NFLKiller
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BookMaker |
NFLKiller
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 328
Location: Illinois
#69
Posted: 12/6/2012 2:28:19 AM
Broncos 30/31
Raiders 20


quote
Miami20062012
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
Miami20062012
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1288
Location: California
#70
Posted: 12/6/2012 3:57:26 AM
I'm a raiders fan fellas and I gotta be honest with you we are beyond terrible.  Raiders covered as an underdog 1 punk behind time this year and it was against an undefeated Falcons team on the road.  And the only reason they covered was because they were double digit underdogs and coming off a bye.  Remember its a short week for oak too. Losing to the Browns , yeah the browns. the trend to me in my opinion in the last 3 games is that vs a capable quarterback and receiving core Brees threw all over us 38-10, Cincy threw the ball anywhere they wanted 34-10 was the result.  This last game we lost by 3 by the browns and to a mediocore rookie 20-17.  Vs Payton and the broncos the score would will be like the saiints score 38-10. We are getting murdered on thursday night remember we are still the most hated team in football........tuck rule anyone?
quote
Topo send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
Topo
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 259
Location: Ontario
#71
Posted: 12/6/2012 4:02:05 AM
Oakland is awful, but so were the other large home underdogs who have been covering at a very high rate these past few seasons.  If I had a clue as to what the total would be I would tease the Raiders to 17.5, but I don't, so I'll play the 10.5 and hope Palmer limits his interceptions.
quote
Miami20062012
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes |
Miami20062012
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1288
Location: California
#72
Posted: 12/6/2012 4:13:00 AM
Sorry for the extras. 3 Team teaser.  Taking Denver Broncos-pk, Xavier-4.5 and Syracuse-13.  With Xavier and Syracuse and home I like my chances of Payton and the broncos winning straight up.  Good Luck everyone. 
quote
SAIGON78 send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
SAIGON78
Participation Meter
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 23
Location:
#73
Posted: 12/6/2012 6:07:25 AM
Pick oakland raider + 10' for  1 unit. And parley oakland under 48 for1/2 unit. 1 unit = $20.00               God bless.....
quote
booyahz123
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
booyahz123
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1668
Location: Pennsylvania
#74
Posted: 12/6/2012 8:50:35 AM
some of you people are a joke with posting waste of money teasers.  grow some balls and make a real pick and bet.  teasers are a waste of time and money, a fools bet thats why they have them.  You cant pick teasers on here for these contest either so why post that kind of stupid betting.

 Dont see DEN doing more than running the ball on a short week against a team like OAK.  under 48 and take the points, everyone betting DEN like they need to win big.  Manning is not going to come out throw 40 times on a short week at his age in a game that really means nothing to them

+10.5 and under 48  24-16 DEN
quote
booyahz123
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
booyahz123
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1668
Location: Pennsylvania
#75
Posted: 12/6/2012 9:06:38 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by mgmprofits:



A lot of people know about this stat...but shouldn't that PROVE to all of us that the game is rigged? If it was not, no way possible would that record stand. I understand good teams could get lazy or play down to the level of bad teams...but I honestly DON'T believe in "Bad" teams when it comes to pro sports. I think the teams are "acting" and "playing" bad when infact you see explosive games out of nowhere coming from those same teams on "Certain" weeks. 

Is it just me, or is it completely obvious that this sport is 100% rigged?

BTW, Denver would cover the -10.5 if it wasn't rigged. But since it's rigged, I guess Oakland covers this one. Remember last week in the KC/DEN thread I predicted outright what would happen BEFORE the game started? I don't think I was psychic...I predicted KC would take the lead in the game, with T/O's from Peyton Manning...and I saw on replay that's what they friggin did.

misleading lines designed to trick bettors and propaganda through media lead people to lose and call rigged or fixed.  I do feel that games are handicapped further by the league through the refs like all pro sports. true insider info never hits the general public until all bets are in and the game starts.  lol 
quote
Forum Index : Pro Football : Messages Page 3 of 6 «  1 2 3 4 5   »
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.