| Author: |
[Pro Football] Topic: Green Bay at Seattle (09/24/2012) |
|
mgmprofits |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Las Vegas Hotel and Casino | |

Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 341
Location: |
#101 Posted: 9/24/2012 7:33:39 PM Green Bay will win tonight. They already took enough of public money yesterday, so today they will allow you to get a small amount back. Funny thing is....they've got us good because now everyone is afraid to take Green Bay!
It's looking like a broken lock for Green Bay.... |
|
quote |
|
smitt12 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 123
Location: Texas |
#102 Posted: 9/24/2012 7:49:36 PM Tough game to call......Seachickens are tough at home and Green Bay hasn't looked good. GB with more time to prepare and Chickens just dominated Dallas at home. Do they have it in em to do it again? Still debating.... |
|
quote |
|
DingDong |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 68
Location: Indiana |
#103 Posted: 9/24/2012 7:57:30 PM Seattle +3.5 -120
open teaser under 53
Seattle stops the run, gets to the QB... Could be a problem for GB to get the ball rolling, love the under.
Home dog in prime time |
|
quote |
|
wonderwomen |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 130
Location: North Carolina |
#104 Posted: 9/24/2012 7:59:21 PM seachickens...lol thats some funny garbage. public will be right on either gb -3 or over. one of those will win.
final pick soon
|
|
quote |
|
wonderwomen |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 130
Location: North Carolina |
#105 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:01:03 PM def love the under so I will take gb -3 n under. small parlay
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
REM2WIN |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44
Location: Nebraska |
#106 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:08:22 PM Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over!
Packers 34 Seahawks 23 |
|
quote |
|
REM2WIN |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44
Location: Nebraska |
#107 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:09:55 PM Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over!
Packers 34 Seahawks 23 |
|
quote |
|
tkling112 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 17
Location: |
#108 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:10:35 PM Lol jrebel23 good one |
|
quote |
|
smitt12 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 123
Location: Texas |
#109 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:24:47 PM Taking the Seachickens tonight....give me the running game, better looking D and the home team plus the points!
Seattle +3.5 GL to all!!!  |
|
quote |
|
bmoreravens |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1
Location: |
#110 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:27:38 PM Last minute pick for those interested. It is important to take a look at the trends and recent history I agree. But many of you have even admitted the Hawks and Packers will try and establish a running game. Running the ball repeatedly as the Hawks and Packers have been doing= UNDER. Also, SEA is 2-0 on the UNDER in last 2 games. Packers have gone UNDER in last 13 OF 19 ROAD games. Trends say Packers at SEA has gone over 5 of the last 7. But I would beg to differ these teams are different. It is also important to note that Rodgers and Co. are coming off an extended week of practice and are well rested. If this were in GB itd be a -7 or -6 line for GB but because it is in SEA it is sitting at -4.
I made the mistake last week taking the Bears against this GB team who came off a loss and that was a BIG mistake. No the Hawks are not the BEARS but they are not the Packers either. Look for Rodgers to make some more errors and throw at least 1 INT as well as it being a Defensive battle to move the ball around. I see Rodgers throwing for 2 TDs and 1 INT with Wilson running for his life most the night and throwing 1 TD and 2 INTs.
Won't be surprised to see Lynch get into the endzone and challk up an 85 yard night with 1 TD. It will be close up until the 4th quarter look for Packers to run rampid and drain the clock in the 4th keeping this one UNDER 46. I do not trust the -4 so I'm laying $100 on the UNDER and GB SU (-180)
Prediction: GB 24 SEA 20 PICK: GB SPREAD: PUSH/SEA +4 (bovada) TOTAL 46 (bovada): UNDER |
|
quote |
|
rosco136 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Rookie
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 643
Location: |
#111 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:28:05 PM Let's Go Packers!  |
|
quote |
|
rosco136 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Rookie
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 643
Location: |
#112 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:29:06 PM Over as well I'm thinking...primetime feels like over...BOL all |
|
quote |
|
0ahuGrown |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Bellagio | |

Banned
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 426
Location: Hawaii |
#113 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:31:15 PM |
|
quote |
|
TORONTO |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2982
Location: United States |
#114 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:33:51 PM Green Bay - 2 1/2
1st 1/2  |
|
quote |
|
larryv123 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetDSI | |

Prospect
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 107
Location: California |
#115 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:40:45 PM sea hawks ml plus under parlay play
|
|
quote |
|
sundream |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 320
Location: Texas |
#116 Posted: 9/24/2012 8:49:55 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by L-Jay:
This team is dangerous this year and they proved that against the Boys this past Sunday at the Link.
I've been to many games at the Link and let me tell you, you can't even hear yourself talk to the person next to you.
What are you? 16 years old? The Link??? Jesus, at least call it Qwest Field as opposed to shorthand for a corporate sponsor.
The Link...lol...that just sounds stupid.
In any case, you're obviously a Homer and you won't do much convincing here.
I took the Pack -3.
|
|
quote |
|
scobar |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: bet365 | |

Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 129
Location: France |
#117 Posted: 9/24/2012 9:16:47 PM 22 ,5 GP 13,5 SEA UNDER |
|
quote |
|
scobar |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: bet365 | |

Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 129
Location: France |
#118 Posted: 9/24/2012 9:18:19 PM 22 ,5 GP 13,5 SEA UNDER |
|
quote |
|
DDH420 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4335
Location: Alberta |
#119 Posted: 9/24/2012 10:16:44 PM That 1st half was crazy,it had more sacks than a S.F bathhouse...................no not speaking from 1st hand knowledge lololol
For the SH
(1)GB SH ML to the U 21 +205
(2)Will game go to o.t yes +750 (shoulda taken +900 pre game) risking 0.25 units |
|
quote |
|
JRebel23 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
Location: |
#120 Posted: 9/24/2012 10:36:12 PM I have to give props where they are due: The Seattle D has showed up big time (as have the Packers D)...but I still think Rogers pulls it out... |
|
quote |
|
scobar |
RSI  View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: bet365 | |

Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 129
Location: France |
#121 Posted: 9/24/2012 10:49:18 PM COIN FLIP |
|
quote |
|
JRebel23 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
Location: |
#122 Posted: 9/24/2012 11:09:20 PM Rogers! Discount DoubleCheck! |
|
quote |
|
pcz |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |

Prospect
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 266
Location: United States |
#123 Posted: 9/24/2012 11:09:35 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by RandyandShirl: My money's on the UNDER tonight.
Packer offense poorly balanced (29 straight games without a 100-yd rusher), and clearly not clicking through the air (3 TDs vs 2 picks and 8 sacks... with lotsa dropped passes L2G at Lambeau!). First road game at Seattle (and the infamous 12th man) wouldn't seem to be what the proverbial doctor would order. Solid Seahawk D allowing just 46 ypg TY and less than 16 ppg 5 of L6G on this field. Packers 5th in total D and 2nd vs the pass and lead league in sacks with 11… BUT, they CAN be run on and Seattle is a strong running team, which fits nicely into my template tonight as they’ll wanna eat clock and keep pressure off rookie QB Wilson. Green Bay gets RB Starks back tonight and after finding their running game a bit LW with Benson (81 yds ), I look for them to also try to establish the run. Green Bay stated LW that they abandoned the running game too early versus San Fran and I look for a big dose of Starks and Benson tonight. This game screams ball control to me... and that spells money.
Green Bay/SEATTLE Under 46
Looks good so far. GJ sniffing it out.
|
|
quote |
|
JRebel23 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
Location: |
#124 Posted: 9/24/2012 11:19:02 PM you can't feel good with your $ on Wilson with the 4th winding down needing a TD...that's why you get behind Rodgers when two good D's face off |
|
quote |
|
JRebel23 |
RSI  View Space | Friends | Playbook | |

Prospect
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
Location: |
#125 Posted: 9/24/2012 11:25:37 PM Here we go...the refs start hemorraging flags out their behind in the last 6 minutes... |
|
quote |