Minnesota at Texas Tech (12/28/2012)

Forum: College Football Page 2 of 2  1 2  
Author: [College Football] Topic: Minnesota at Texas Tech (12/28/2012)
combato PM combato
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 754
 
combato
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:39:05 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by osu200200:

combato... i would love to hear how u come up with your score calculations, cause like the ohio game... you are just dead wrong based on statistical analysis. tech should be 14.5 pt fav statistically. if you make up point values based on motivation and coaching situations then that makes sense, but it's impossible to put a number on that. there is no telling how a team will respond to an interim coach and there is certainly not a hard number you can use to include in a score projection.


Would you care to continue to discuss my opinion on the Ohio game now ( 44 -14 winner ).  I don't win them all but it does prove a point
binger1 PM binger1
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 549
 
binger1
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:49:28 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Richard19655691:

A fifth grader with no coaching experience could coach Texas Tech over Minnesota! Texas Tech is by far superior!

Texas Tech -13

I expect a 24 to 35 point victory!

  LMFAO  my thoughts exactly!!
combato PM combato
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 754
 
combato
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:53:23 PM
[Quote: Originally Posted by FleshGordun] Texas Tech -13. This is a mismatch hoping they show ready to play and don't pull a UCLA [/Quote
Exactly right Trailblazer - very good point]
binger1 PM binger1
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 549
 
binger1
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 12/28/2012 6:58:06 PM
TEXAS TECH -13 
best_bets PM best_bets
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6296
 
best_bets
Participation Meter
Captain
Posted: 12/28/2012 7:05:48 PM

combato thank you for your thread on the ohio game. very good insight as my account got larger. i will make a small play on minnesota. hell the minnesota vikings are playing great. maybe it rubs off on the gophers??? worth a shot

time-out PM time-out
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 118
 
time-out
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/28/2012 7:11:20 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by BillySims:

Minnesota:
Passing: Max Shortell (853)
Rushing: Donnell Kirkwood (848)
Receiving: Derrick Engel (267)

Texas Tech:
Passing: Seth Doege (3934)
Rushing: Kenny Williams (779)
Receiving: Eric Ward (974)

Somebody.....explain how MINN has a shot? Pls explain it as if I'm a six year old. And draw stick figures to illustrate if necessary.

   THAT IS FUNNY TO ME!!!  
osu200200 PM osu200200
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1723
 
osu200200
Participation Meter
Veteran
Posted: 12/28/2012 7:14:12 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by combato:



Would you care to continue to discuss my opinion on the Ohio game now ( 44 -14 winner ).  I don't win them all but it does prove a point

that wasn't my point, if you read my posts you would know i didn't wager on the ohio game and i guarantee you didn't have ohio winning by 30 based on your "analysis". i had said from the start that ohio might finally have time to get healthy so a new team could show up. my point is your score predictions are ludicrous. if you want to post your leans and such then that makes sense, but to say based on statistical analysis ohio should have been favored or minnesota should only be a 1 pt dog is just plain wrong. that is why i was asking how you came up with those numbers cause you say you base it on analysis.

luckyman7 PM luckyman7
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 616
 
luckyman7
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 12/28/2012 7:18:16 PM

The Golden Gofers has a habit of pissing on me when I bet on or again there. baskets or football. They  are just one of those teams. So I would love to make money tonight.  There are only 3 bowls games with the ml at -500 or greater an this is one of them.

 

I just cant lay 13 with what I've read and saw last night withCinic.  The last play pick 6 give the cover.

I will get this under 7 and I hope the better team wins.  That means Teaser Time 

JinxyCat PM JinxyCat
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11
 
JinxyCat
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/28/2012 7:26:43 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Trailblaza05:

If everyone is so confident in TT than why has the spread not changed even when 65% of the public is on TT?

65% of covers consensus does not represent the public 
mason0217 PM mason0217
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 327
 
mason0217
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/28/2012 7:28:53 PM
they are playing the game RIGHT??? Have you all seem what has happen lately... that's why they play the GAME!! GOOD LUCK TO ALL ... UNDER THE TOTAL 55.5
kevdogg42 PM kevdogg42
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
 
kevdogg42
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/28/2012 8:12:52 PM
Over over over
Posted using a mobile device.
oahuboy808 PM oahuboy808
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4801
 
oahuboy808
Participation Meter
Veteran
Posted: 12/28/2012 8:49:31 PM
If it was easy as always betting the better team, we'd all be rich.. If you've been gambling for any amount of time, you'll know lines aren't always as they seem.. Anyways.. Minnesota and under for me.. Best of luck guys
Posted using a mobile device.
WiseGuy702 PM WiseGuy702
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11862
 
WiseGuy702
Participation Meter
All-Star
Posted: 12/28/2012 8:53:25 PM
Minnesota +13




THE_KIDD PM THE_KIDD
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 35
 
THE_KIDD
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/28/2012 8:56:13 PM
[Quote: Originally Posted by Whalewatcher] You mean TT -13.5!! [/Quote]THX I thought i posted that right after ??!! but thank u!, that is what i meant !!!
GordoPockets PM GordoPockets
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 277
 
GordoPockets
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/28/2012 9:38:34 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by osu200200:

that wasn't my point, if you read my posts you would know i didn't wager on the ohio game and i guarantee you didn't have ohio winning by 30 based on your "analysis". i had said from the start that ohio might finally have time to get healthy so a new team could show up. my point is your score predictions are ludicrous. if you want to post your leans and such then that makes sense, but to say based on statistical analysis ohio should have been favored or minnesota should only be a 1 pt dog is just plain wrong. that is why i was asking how you came up with those numbers cause you say you base it on analysis.

osu200200... Maybe if you stopped criticizing people on here and listened to some insights you wouldn't have a 45% win rate.

I haven't been on here long but combato has given some good picks and insight. I don't listen to anyone but myself but I like to hear what others have to say... Not trying to jump on you but just ask some pointed questions and you might learn something Mr 45%....

binger1 PM binger1
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 549
 
binger1
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 12/28/2012 9:47:18 PM

LOOKS LIKE THIS girl IS GOIN WAY OVER !!

binger1 PM binger1
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 549
 
binger1
Participation Meter
Rookie
Posted: 12/28/2012 10:52:04 PM
The way they edit cussing on this site is FUCKIN STUPID!!!!!!
Trailblaza05 PM Trailblaza05
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
 
Trailblaza05
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/29/2012 12:08:45 AM
Hey Jinxy I wasnt going by covers. Hope you had fun betting TT tonight
fakecake2727 PM fakecake2727
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
 
fakecake2727
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/29/2012 12:20:11 AM
80% on fresno lost, 80% on fresno over lost. UL monroe 66% lost. 70% on UL monroe over lost. 56% rutgers lost. 80% orlando magic lost. 77% on heat lost. 80 percent on texas tech lost. If your betting with the public consensus this time of year you're going to lose.   The public did pretty well up until this week. If you want to keep losing bet the favorites. These lines are the way they are for a reason they take every think you think you know into consideration. Best cappers are still only 58%..... Don't be stupid and lose all your money, just trying to help brotherss.....
CaddyMac PM CaddyMac
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28
 
CaddyMac
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/29/2012 12:47:27 AM
Interesting thing happened when I logged onto bovada to check my bets, in particular my TTU -13 bet which was placed Dec. 24th. That bet was was already marked as a "loss"  at 9:34pm mountain time. It said final score was MIN 10 TTU 7. Called them and they said it would be sorted out and that they were just "updating" their system. Weird...
fakecake2727 PM fakecake2727
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
 
fakecake2727
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/29/2012 2:29:24 AM
bdog is horrible they switched all my bets 4 years when I won 1200 and it said I loss I even had them printed out because my buddy had the same problem and warned me, so i called bdog and the lady wasn"t even surprised, it was like it happens everyday. no one regulates these sites because they're either outside the US or on indian reservations 
bgshocker PM bgshocker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 46
 
bgshocker
Participation Meter
Prospect
Posted: 12/29/2012 11:03:33 AM
so what was everyone saying about Texas Tech.  You were wrong!!
Forum: College Football Page 2 of 2  1 2  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.