I bet a lot of games I am still reasearching for the later games. Heres what I've got so far and will save my night games for my eyes only. These plays I am posting are lines I think are not where they should be. But lines Vegas set to pull in bets on the team they want pulling in bets on and the public fell for it , so they are also public fades on top of where the lines made them public plays. I have been doing very good with these plays. Follow or fade could careless , Rhode Island , N.Iowa , Arkansas , St Louis , So.Miss , Utep.........Now heres the games where the public went with me where the lines were also the same way and the public actually went against the line being wrong , I don't bet these games because I like public fades more........85% on Notre Dame , 72% on Louisville ,98% on Detroit , 84% on OHIO U.....do with what you like but I fade the consensus when ever possible (on light cards like last night I do take some popular plays as I was on LOY MD : )
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I bet a lot of games I am still reasearching for the later games. Heres what I've got so far and will save my night games for my eyes only. These plays I am posting are lines I think are not where they should be. But lines Vegas set to pull in bets on the team they want pulling in bets on and the public fell for it , so they are also public fades on top of where the lines made them public plays. I have been doing very good with these plays. Follow or fade could careless , Rhode Island , N.Iowa , Arkansas , St Louis , So.Miss , Utep.........Now heres the games where the public went with me where the lines were also the same way and the public actually went against the line being wrong , I don't bet these games because I like public fades more........85% on Notre Dame , 72% on Louisville ,98% on Detroit , 84% on OHIO U.....do with what you like but I fade the consensus when ever possible (on light cards like last night I do take some popular plays as I was on LOY MD : )
yes sir and keeping an eye on the others closely for future info , when I fade it hit about 65% when its not a fade its more like 55% and I'm trying to figure out why these lines are set the way they are. I know the big story is to get equal action on both sides but its not true at all..........if this was so 95% of bettors would not lose at this betting on games
0
yes sir and keeping an eye on the others closely for future info , when I fade it hit about 65% when its not a fade its more like 55% and I'm trying to figure out why these lines are set the way they are. I know the big story is to get equal action on both sides but its not true at all..........if this was so 95% of bettors would not lose at this betting on games
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.