2. Georgetown - they show up when you don`t want em to but not when you bet on them
3. Southern Cal - fuck these guys and their tarnished program... just cause your season was a writeoff doesn`t mean you have to screw all your ats backers... that UCLA game was a disgrace.
4. Siena - these guys have laid 2 huge 2nd half eggs on me
5. Purdue - these guys are notorious point shavers and i will never back them unless they are getting points.
2. Georgetown - they show up when you don`t want em to but not when you bet on them
3. Southern Cal - fuck these guys and their tarnished program... just cause your season was a writeoff doesn`t mean you have to screw all your ats backers... that UCLA game was a disgrace.
4. Siena - these guys have laid 2 huge 2nd half eggs on me
5. Purdue - these guys are notorious point shavers and i will never back them unless they are getting points.
Kentucky has nailed me in back to back games, lines being set where the public is hammering them to the tune of 78+ percent and winning. They would probably get the same percentage of the public action, or at least close, with lines where Kentucky would have only covered one of those games, maybe neither.
Wayne Brady might have to fuckin smack an oddsmaker
Kentucky has nailed me in back to back games, lines being set where the public is hammering them to the tune of 78+ percent and winning. They would probably get the same percentage of the public action, or at least close, with lines where Kentucky would have only covered one of those games, maybe neither.
Wayne Brady might have to fuckin smack an oddsmaker
Kentucky has nailed me in back to back games, lines being set where the public is hammering them to the tune of 78+ percent and winning. They would probably get the same percentage of the public action, or at least close, with lines where Kentucky would have only covered one of those games, maybe neither.
Wayne Brady might have to fuckin smack an oddsmaker
I agree, The lines they put out plays games with my head...
Kentucky has nailed me in back to back games, lines being set where the public is hammering them to the tune of 78+ percent and winning. They would probably get the same percentage of the public action, or at least close, with lines where Kentucky would have only covered one of those games, maybe neither.
Wayne Brady might have to fuckin smack an oddsmaker
I agree, The lines they put out plays games with my head...
8 out of 9 on a parlay had Kentucky ML. Straigh up win brings me $3500. Only game they lost all year.
New Mexico
-4.5 vs San Diego They are up 14? 1:30 to go. Same guy Martinez, who was 8-9 on 3pointers, commits 2 offensive fouls, turnovers and misses 2 freethrows. Give up 10 points and win by 4.
+5 UNLV my dumb ass backs the rebels my own fault New Mex rolls
next game -3.5 vs Utah Lose by the hook again
USC
Just for playing balls out. They sucked then Gerrity came and they knock off Tennessee, UNLV and UW Playing way better than predicted
8 out of 9 on a parlay had Kentucky ML. Straigh up win brings me $3500. Only game they lost all year.
New Mexico
-4.5 vs San Diego They are up 14? 1:30 to go. Same guy Martinez, who was 8-9 on 3pointers, commits 2 offensive fouls, turnovers and misses 2 freethrows. Give up 10 points and win by 4.
+5 UNLV my dumb ass backs the rebels my own fault New Mex rolls
next game -3.5 vs Utah Lose by the hook again
USC
Just for playing balls out. They sucked then Gerrity came and they knock off Tennessee, UNLV and UW Playing way better than predicted
Duke without a doubt... thank God I won with Miami +8 the other night. Duke kills me anyway I bet them and I typically bet against them. I'm probably 2-12 on their games this year betting with or against them.
Had been doing great on Kansas games until today. Had Kansas -20.5 BIG and their scrubs stuck it where the sun don't shine. Rough loss to be nice as they were up 27 when the shitheads came into the game.
Duke without a doubt... thank God I won with Miami +8 the other night. Duke kills me anyway I bet them and I typically bet against them. I'm probably 2-12 on their games this year betting with or against them.
Had been doing great on Kansas games until today. Had Kansas -20.5 BIG and their scrubs stuck it where the sun don't shine. Rough loss to be nice as they were up 27 when the shitheads came into the game.
The Missouri Valley Conference and every team in it, I cant seem to pick it for shit this year. No clue why really. Dont think its that the teams are less identifyable than in the past (So Ill w/faulkner, Creighton, Drake last couple years) and there is a lot of parity, but I am ALWAYS fucking wrong on this conference this year. Just havent touched it.
Great conference nontheless, all the teams pack 10k+ arenas and can shoot and play D.
Havent hammered my favorite teams coming into the year as much as I liked early, Baylors my squad Tweety and LaceDarius my niggas and they been burning me now that Ive been betting them more so probably them.
Texas maybe but I know when to bet them Barnes rolls with a 15 man rotation that team will never get in a groove against a good D but Ive definitely lost on them this year.
See when I have a hard bet against but I realise that I was wrong about it and realise that team is actually OK, I get pretty nice on them beacuse since I used to always go against them Im very subjective. Stanford this year looked awful when I first saw them a bunch of guys who should be playing DIII or a conference w/out lines with Green and Fields, but Green and Fields are nice as fuck so Ive done great on Stanford this year.
The Missouri Valley Conference and every team in it, I cant seem to pick it for shit this year. No clue why really. Dont think its that the teams are less identifyable than in the past (So Ill w/faulkner, Creighton, Drake last couple years) and there is a lot of parity, but I am ALWAYS fucking wrong on this conference this year. Just havent touched it.
Great conference nontheless, all the teams pack 10k+ arenas and can shoot and play D.
Havent hammered my favorite teams coming into the year as much as I liked early, Baylors my squad Tweety and LaceDarius my niggas and they been burning me now that Ive been betting them more so probably them.
Texas maybe but I know when to bet them Barnes rolls with a 15 man rotation that team will never get in a groove against a good D but Ive definitely lost on them this year.
See when I have a hard bet against but I realise that I was wrong about it and realise that team is actually OK, I get pretty nice on them beacuse since I used to always go against them Im very subjective. Stanford this year looked awful when I first saw them a bunch of guys who should be playing DIII or a conference w/out lines with Green and Fields, but Green and Fields are nice as fuck so Ive done great on Stanford this year.
WAKE FOREST IS SO DAMN TERRIBLE. THEY'VE COST ME ON THE ROAD A FEW TIMES AND AT HOME ONCE OR TWICE. THEY SEEM TO GET IN FOUL TROUBLE FIRST 5 MIN EVERY GAME. ALSO LAST YEAR I REALLY LIKED WAKE IN TOURNEY VS CLEVELAND ST AND WE ALL NOW HOW THAT TURNED OUT. I THINK I;M OFFICALLY RETIRING FROM PLAYING THE DEACONS
WAKE FOREST IS SO DAMN TERRIBLE. THEY'VE COST ME ON THE ROAD A FEW TIMES AND AT HOME ONCE OR TWICE. THEY SEEM TO GET IN FOUL TROUBLE FIRST 5 MIN EVERY GAME. ALSO LAST YEAR I REALLY LIKED WAKE IN TOURNEY VS CLEVELAND ST AND WE ALL NOW HOW THAT TURNED OUT. I THINK I;M OFFICALLY RETIRING FROM PLAYING THE DEACONS
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.