wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
0
wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
Put your money on Nova and prove everyone wrong. I hear what your saying but i dont think Nova is as good as their ranking. Dont get me wrong Nova is a great team, but are they really great right now at this point in the season? Gtown plays hard and if they can slow the pace of the game, they will win SU
0
Put your money on Nova and prove everyone wrong. I hear what your saying but i dont think Nova is as good as their ranking. Dont get me wrong Nova is a great team, but are they really great right now at this point in the season? Gtown plays hard and if they can slow the pace of the game, they will win SU
wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Tressel:
wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
its 51% on gtown here and then 53% out of 4000+on another site hows that everyone
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Tressel:
wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
its 51% on gtown here and then 53% out of 4000+on another site hows that everyone
wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
You are 100% spot on. It's not about an exact percentage of posters here on a particular play compared to what you see on the wagerline consensus. It's about the PERCEPTION. And Tressel's PERCEPTION is absolutely correct. We have seen this hundreds of times before. And he is also right that when people have the side that everyone on covers seems to be on and then sees his kind of comment, they make statements to the opposite to feel better about their pick. Just admit it. I have done that before, too - - I was SO sure I was on the right side when I capped a game, and then I go on covers and see everyone is on the same side - - it almost ALWAYS scares me. DOn't get me wrong - - it's not a conspiracy or anything - - it's not like the teams or vegas sees what is going on these boards and then switches the game the other way - - I'm just saying that (an unscientific number) when the PERCEPTIOn that the whole covers community is on the same side, 75% of the time, the game goes the other way. There were several examples of this during the bowl season and several in hoops so far. The whole board taking louisville -3 over Nova last week comes to mind. The 25% rule worked last week when everyone was on Kentucky -3.5 at Florida and Kentucky covered with ease.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Tressel:
wait for the G-Town backers to flood this thread with all the talk that "not everyone" is on G-Town (which they are). And that plenty of squares will be on the higher ranked Nova, and that they have seen plenty of threads of people on Nova (which there are not).
You are 100% spot on. It's not about an exact percentage of posters here on a particular play compared to what you see on the wagerline consensus. It's about the PERCEPTION. And Tressel's PERCEPTION is absolutely correct. We have seen this hundreds of times before. And he is also right that when people have the side that everyone on covers seems to be on and then sees his kind of comment, they make statements to the opposite to feel better about their pick. Just admit it. I have done that before, too - - I was SO sure I was on the right side when I capped a game, and then I go on covers and see everyone is on the same side - - it almost ALWAYS scares me. DOn't get me wrong - - it's not a conspiracy or anything - - it's not like the teams or vegas sees what is going on these boards and then switches the game the other way - - I'm just saying that (an unscientific number) when the PERCEPTIOn that the whole covers community is on the same side, 75% of the time, the game goes the other way. There were several examples of this during the bowl season and several in hoops so far. The whole board taking louisville -3 over Nova last week comes to mind. The 25% rule worked last week when everyone was on Kentucky -3.5 at Florida and Kentucky covered with ease.
Scottie R. came back to win a title with Nova and a Big East championship....he also came back to beat the Hoyas...they havent since 2007 and have lost 5 TIMES in a row...couple that with the fact that the line started at -6...down to 4.5....
Give me the Wildcats...-4.5......moneyline -200.....
0
Scottie R. came back to win a title with Nova and a Big East championship....he also came back to beat the Hoyas...they havent since 2007 and have lost 5 TIMES in a row...couple that with the fact that the line started at -6...down to 4.5....
Give me the Wildcats...-4.5......moneyline -200.....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
