1. Michigan -6 -- the 1-3-1 Beilein zone is so tough to game plan for in early out of conference games, it could cause serious problems for Creighton tomorrow. I think Michigan is gonna be underrated a bit this year.
2. Portland +5 -- UCLA is still young and inconsistent with shoddy PG play. Getting Dragovic back should help a little bit might make UCLA actually a little worse defensively (Keefe is much better defensively than Drago but doesn't have Drago's offensive skills). I might wait and see if this line gets pushed up by UCLA money to see if we could catch Portland at 6.5 or something. There is definite clear value in the moneyline here as well, Portland is no joke.
1. Michigan -6 -- the 1-3-1 Beilein zone is so tough to game plan for in early out of conference games, it could cause serious problems for Creighton tomorrow. I think Michigan is gonna be underrated a bit this year.
2. Portland +5 -- UCLA is still young and inconsistent with shoddy PG play. Getting Dragovic back should help a little bit might make UCLA actually a little worse defensively (Keefe is much better defensively than Drago but doesn't have Drago's offensive skills). I might wait and see if this line gets pushed up by UCLA money to see if we could catch Portland at 6.5 or something. There is definite clear value in the moneyline here as well, Portland is no joke.
Hoops -- LB State seems to be hit or miss for me, I can't really predict them too well. What do you think?
bracks -- no inside info, I just know they are a good squad. That, and UCLA is young and inexperienced. Tough matchup for them in this spot, Portland is the type of team that should be able to match up with or beat the Bruins in an early round tourney game.
outlaw -- maybe I wait till the morning to take Portland then
0
Hoops -- LB State seems to be hit or miss for me, I can't really predict them too well. What do you think?
bracks -- no inside info, I just know they are a good squad. That, and UCLA is young and inexperienced. Tough matchup for them in this spot, Portland is the type of team that should be able to match up with or beat the Bruins in an early round tourney game.
outlaw -- maybe I wait till the morning to take Portland then
Hoops -- LB State seems to be hit or miss for me, I can't really predict them too well. What do you think?
bracks -- no inside info, I just know they are a good squad. That, and UCLA is young and inexperienced. Tough matchup for them in this spot, Portland is the type of team that should be able to match up with or beat the Bruins in an early round tourney game.
outlaw -- maybe I wait till the morning to take Portland then
I will probably take them myself. Hoping to get six but it may not matter. Portland could take that one outright. Good luck to you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Hoops -- LB State seems to be hit or miss for me, I can't really predict them too well. What do you think?
bracks -- no inside info, I just know they are a good squad. That, and UCLA is young and inexperienced. Tough matchup for them in this spot, Portland is the type of team that should be able to match up with or beat the Bruins in an early round tourney game.
outlaw -- maybe I wait till the morning to take Portland then
I will probably take them myself. Hoping to get six but it may not matter. Portland could take that one outright. Good luck to you.
UNLV had trouble with LB in their scrimmage this year, outrebounded them I believe, but UNLVs bigs are garbage so that does not surprise me. Huggys teams are grind it out type teams like Krugers, and those teams usually dont start clicking until later on in the season. LB is supposed to contend in the Big West, and being in Anaheim, I think that 15 points is alot to spot them.
Kentucky
0
UNLV had trouble with LB in their scrimmage this year, outrebounded them I believe, but UNLVs bigs are garbage so that does not surprise me. Huggys teams are grind it out type teams like Krugers, and those teams usually dont start clicking until later on in the season. LB is supposed to contend in the Big West, and being in Anaheim, I think that 15 points is alot to spot them.
1. Michigan -6 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 -- Maybe I have a little too much faith in the 1-3-1 zone, but I've seen it flummox teams that don't see it frequently too many times.
2. Portland +5.5 (-114), 3.42 to win 3 -- Portland is all business and I think that getting Drago back will actually hurt UCLA (as set forth above). I've had this game circled on my calendar for a while. I think that Portland beating Oregon is what prevented this line from being what I hoped it would be, which was 7.5 or 8 or so. Even at 5.5, I'm willing to eat the extra juice that I don't usually eat because I feel like this is a tough spot for UCLA. Portland is by FAR the best team that they will have played this season. Portland is the type of disciplined team that could give a young, turnover prone UCLA team lacking true PG strength (a staple of Howland's UCLA teams) serious problems. Don't be surprised to see Portland throw a zone out.
0
Locking in:
1. Michigan -6 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 -- Maybe I have a little too much faith in the 1-3-1 zone, but I've seen it flummox teams that don't see it frequently too many times.
2. Portland +5.5 (-114), 3.42 to win 3 -- Portland is all business and I think that getting Drago back will actually hurt UCLA (as set forth above). I've had this game circled on my calendar for a while. I think that Portland beating Oregon is what prevented this line from being what I hoped it would be, which was 7.5 or 8 or so. Even at 5.5, I'm willing to eat the extra juice that I don't usually eat because I feel like this is a tough spot for UCLA. Portland is by FAR the best team that they will have played this season. Portland is the type of disciplined team that could give a young, turnover prone UCLA team lacking true PG strength (a staple of Howland's UCLA teams) serious problems. Don't be surprised to see Portland throw a zone out.
The thing that scares me about Michigan is that this unchartered water for them. To open the season in the Top 20 and actually have expectations put on them? Wow, never thought I'd see the day. And this Michigan team will live and die by the "3" this season, meaning they can probably beat any team in the country on a good day, downside: they can probably lose to about 290 teams on any given day. Creighton is always tough. They've had a "Korver" on their team for about two decades now and those guys can all shoot. Michigan should win, and "gun to my head" I lay the points, but Creighton may be able to exploit Michigan down low, 'cuz Sims plays on the perimeter 90% of the game. Sorry to ramble on!!!!
Good luck and Happy Holiday!!!
0
Sup kapono?
You really like Portland huh?
The thing that scares me about Michigan is that this unchartered water for them. To open the season in the Top 20 and actually have expectations put on them? Wow, never thought I'd see the day. And this Michigan team will live and die by the "3" this season, meaning they can probably beat any team in the country on a good day, downside: they can probably lose to about 290 teams on any given day. Creighton is always tough. They've had a "Korver" on their team for about two decades now and those guys can all shoot. Michigan should win, and "gun to my head" I lay the points, but Creighton may be able to exploit Michigan down low, 'cuz Sims plays on the perimeter 90% of the game. Sorry to ramble on!!!!
[Quote: Originally Posted by kaponofor3] Locking in:
1. Michigan -6 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 -- Maybe I have a little too much faith in the 1-3-1 zone, but I've seen it flummox teams that don't see it frequently too many times.
2. Portland +5.5 (-114), 3.42 to win 3 -- Portland is all business and I think that getting Drago back will actually hurt UCLA (as set forth above). I've had this game circled on my calendar for a while. I think that Portland beating Oregon is what prevented this line from being what I hoped it would be, which was 7.5 or 8 or so. Even at 5.5, I'm willing to eat the extra juice that I don't usually eat because I feel like this is a tough spot for UCLA. Portland is by FAR the best team that they will have played this season. Portland is the type of disciplined team that could give a young, turnover prone UCLA team lacking true PG strength (a staple of Howland's UCLA teams) serious problems. Don't be surprised to see Portland throw a zone out. [/Quote
Portland at +4 on my book - made a big move in last hour
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by kaponofor3] Locking in:
1. Michigan -6 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 -- Maybe I have a little too much faith in the 1-3-1 zone, but I've seen it flummox teams that don't see it frequently too many times.
2. Portland +5.5 (-114), 3.42 to win 3 -- Portland is all business and I think that getting Drago back will actually hurt UCLA (as set forth above). I've had this game circled on my calendar for a while. I think that Portland beating Oregon is what prevented this line from being what I hoped it would be, which was 7.5 or 8 or so. Even at 5.5, I'm willing to eat the extra juice that I don't usually eat because I feel like this is a tough spot for UCLA. Portland is by FAR the best team that they will have played this season. Portland is the type of disciplined team that could give a young, turnover prone UCLA team lacking true PG strength (a staple of Howland's UCLA teams) serious problems. Don't be surprised to see Portland throw a zone out. [/Quote
Portland at +4 on my book - made a big move in last hour
bense -- you aren't rambling, your thoughts and insights are always welcome here in my thread. It's pretty clear that you know your basketball, and I want to hear from people like that all day any day.
Ools -- what book? If that is the case I'm really happy I picked up the extra half point even if it cost me in juice.
nap -- I'd lean under just cause of the 1-3-1 zone, it can take a team an entire half to adjust to it.
0
bense -- you aren't rambling, your thoughts and insights are always welcome here in my thread. It's pretty clear that you know your basketball, and I want to hear from people like that all day any day.
Ools -- what book? If that is the case I'm really happy I picked up the extra half point even if it cost me in juice.
nap -- I'd lean under just cause of the 1-3-1 zone, it can take a team an entire half to adjust to it.
bense -- you aren't rambling, your thoughts and insights are always welcome here in my thread. It's pretty clear that you know your basketball, and I want to hear from people like that all day any day.
Ools -- what book? If that is the case I'm really happy I picked up the extra half point even if it cost me in juice.
nap -- I'd lean under just cause of the 1-3-1 zone, it can take a team an entire half to adjust to it.
It's one of those "bookie" record keeper books -- BetEagle
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
bense -- you aren't rambling, your thoughts and insights are always welcome here in my thread. It's pretty clear that you know your basketball, and I want to hear from people like that all day any day.
Ools -- what book? If that is the case I'm really happy I picked up the extra half point even if it cost me in juice.
nap -- I'd lean under just cause of the 1-3-1 zone, it can take a team an entire half to adjust to it.
It's one of those "bookie" record keeper books -- BetEagle
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.