Sides, 54-45, +7.85
Totals, 7-10, -5.50
Year, 61-55, +2.35
Getting into some heavy conference action after the New Year, so time to go to work…
Sacramento State at Northern Colorado
This game is sort of similar to Troy/South Bama where you have one team who has excelled in non-conference action while the other has struggled. But still, when you throw all of that junk out the window, you still have two teams are extremely similar within the conference and 9 points does not separate them. Yes, Sacramento State has started out to a pitiful 2-8 record while Northern Colorado has spurted to a 5-6 record. Yes, Sacramento State is horrible on the road, but they’re last road win came in this very venue last year. Each team split games last year, with each team winning on the road. Sacramento State doesn’t own a win against a D-1 team yet, I know. I’m well aware.
With all that, there still isn’t a 9 point difference warranted between these two teams. I actually have Sacramento State pegged at the #8 slot in the Big Sky, while I have Northern Colorado at the #9, dead last, spot in the Big Sky going into the season. I take a look at records, 2-8, 5-6, obviously something skewed right? Yup. Take a look at strength of schedules. Sacramento State, thus far, has played the #9 strength of schedule in the nation. Going on the road to Kansas State, Oregon, Pacific, San Fran, Stanford, and Marquette. Not the easiest places to go into and even try to compete. The average lines in those games was a +24, and they covered 4 of them. Northern Colorado’s won all 4 home games this year, which probably is a reason for the line where it is. Yet, those home victories come against Bowling Green, Colorado State, Johnson & Wales, and Denver, all losing squads. That equates to a #212 strength of schedule, THE WORST in the Big Sky.
When you can rank teams prior to non-conference play before the season even starts, and can be somewhat successful, you can look at teams and find value. You find teams who have over-achieved (which in this case Northern Colorado has I think), and you find teams who have under-achieved (nope, Sac St. does not fit into this category). Going into the season in the Big Sky, I had Kirk Archibeque as the most important part to the Northern Colorado team. He’s a senior leader who had averaged double figures in his first three seasons at UNC. He hasn’t played since the win at home vs. Denver due to a concussion, and still listed as questionable for this game tonight. The only other player worth mentioning on UNC’s squad is Sean Taibi. He’s a pretty quick guard who can create a shot whenever he wants, typically likes to shoot the 3ball. He’s been battling a knee injury all year, sat out a few games, and just isn’t the same player he was last year. He hasn’t started since the knee injury either, but I would expect him in the starting lineup tonight.
The main reason for the Sacramento State ranking over Northern Colorado at the bottom of the Big Sky is simply experience. They returned a junior guard in Loren Leath (he‘s leading the league in scoring), who is coming off of one of his worst games of his career at Marquette. I wouldn’t expect that to happen two games in a row. They also returned four seniors with a sh*t-ton of experience within conference play, and they’ve done nothing but get better from their freshman year. About the only concern I have taking the +9 is having a freshman at the PG slot, but his stat-line shows 10 ppg, 7 apg, 2 rpg, and 1.5 spg, and leads the conference in assists, and ranks towards the top in assist to turnover ratio, and that’s against the 9th toughest schedule in the nation. It is skewed a bit by the tough schedule, but only one of Sac St’s games have been decided by less than 9 points, a loss to Southern Utah. So, it’s possible that I’m picking the straight up winner, but I honestly feel Sac State has a chance here.
I’m getting the best player on the court coming off of one of his worst games in his career, a team who won in this exact same spot last year on the road, and a team who is just not nine points worse in my opinion.
5* Sacramento State +9
Fairfield at St. Peters
My #7 catching points at my #10 in the Metro-Atlantic while Farifield’s played a much tougher schedule thus far. I’m gonna wait for another point or two, don’t think I’m gonna get it, but I’m happy playing a PK in worst case scenario, but I sure as h*ll won’t make it a big play, nor will I lay chalk if it moves that way.
Still eyeing the SIU/Butler game, but those are the only three I’m interested in for Friday.
GL
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Sides, 54-45, +7.85
Totals, 7-10, -5.50
Year, 61-55, +2.35
Getting into some heavy conference action after the New Year, so time to go to work…
Sacramento State at Northern Colorado
This game is sort of similar to Troy/South Bama where you have one team who has excelled in non-conference action while the other has struggled. But still, when you throw all of that junk out the window, you still have two teams are extremely similar within the conference and 9 points does not separate them. Yes, Sacramento State has started out to a pitiful 2-8 record while Northern Colorado has spurted to a 5-6 record. Yes, Sacramento State is horrible on the road, but they’re last road win came in this very venue last year. Each team split games last year, with each team winning on the road. Sacramento State doesn’t own a win against a D-1 team yet, I know. I’m well aware.
With all that, there still isn’t a 9 point difference warranted between these two teams. I actually have Sacramento State pegged at the #8 slot in the Big Sky, while I have Northern Colorado at the #9, dead last, spot in the Big Sky going into the season. I take a look at records, 2-8, 5-6, obviously something skewed right? Yup. Take a look at strength of schedules. Sacramento State, thus far, has played the #9 strength of schedule in the nation. Going on the road to Kansas State, Oregon, Pacific, San Fran, Stanford, and Marquette. Not the easiest places to go into and even try to compete. The average lines in those games was a +24, and they covered 4 of them. Northern Colorado’s won all 4 home games this year, which probably is a reason for the line where it is. Yet, those home victories come against Bowling Green, Colorado State, Johnson & Wales, and Denver, all losing squads. That equates to a #212 strength of schedule, THE WORST in the Big Sky.
When you can rank teams prior to non-conference play before the season even starts, and can be somewhat successful, you can look at teams and find value. You find teams who have over-achieved (which in this case Northern Colorado has I think), and you find teams who have under-achieved (nope, Sac St. does not fit into this category). Going into the season in the Big Sky, I had Kirk Archibeque as the most important part to the Northern Colorado team. He’s a senior leader who had averaged double figures in his first three seasons at UNC. He hasn’t played since the win at home vs. Denver due to a concussion, and still listed as questionable for this game tonight. The only other player worth mentioning on UNC’s squad is Sean Taibi. He’s a pretty quick guard who can create a shot whenever he wants, typically likes to shoot the 3ball. He’s been battling a knee injury all year, sat out a few games, and just isn’t the same player he was last year. He hasn’t started since the knee injury either, but I would expect him in the starting lineup tonight.
The main reason for the Sacramento State ranking over Northern Colorado at the bottom of the Big Sky is simply experience. They returned a junior guard in Loren Leath (he‘s leading the league in scoring), who is coming off of one of his worst games of his career at Marquette. I wouldn’t expect that to happen two games in a row. They also returned four seniors with a sh*t-ton of experience within conference play, and they’ve done nothing but get better from their freshman year. About the only concern I have taking the +9 is having a freshman at the PG slot, but his stat-line shows 10 ppg, 7 apg, 2 rpg, and 1.5 spg, and leads the conference in assists, and ranks towards the top in assist to turnover ratio, and that’s against the 9th toughest schedule in the nation. It is skewed a bit by the tough schedule, but only one of Sac St’s games have been decided by less than 9 points, a loss to Southern Utah. So, it’s possible that I’m picking the straight up winner, but I honestly feel Sac State has a chance here.
I’m getting the best player on the court coming off of one of his worst games in his career, a team who won in this exact same spot last year on the road, and a team who is just not nine points worse in my opinion.
5* Sacramento State +9
Fairfield at St. Peters
My #7 catching points at my #10 in the Metro-Atlantic while Farifield’s played a much tougher schedule thus far. I’m gonna wait for another point or two, don’t think I’m gonna get it, but I’m happy playing a PK in worst case scenario, but I sure as h*ll won’t make it a big play, nor will I lay chalk if it moves that way.
Still eyeing the SIU/Butler game, but those are the only three I’m interested in for Friday.
GL
wow great slate tomorrow --- Gonzaga/Tennessee Arizona/Memphis-------
I think Pitt could run into trouble at Dayton and the UCLA spread should be about 45.
0
wow great slate tomorrow --- Gonzaga/Tennessee Arizona/Memphis-------
I think Pitt could run into trouble at Dayton and the UCLA spread should be about 45.
hey buddy, are you looking at the Bradley/UNI game tomorrow? anything under 10 pt spread rule in effect?
me and bradley aren't mixing this year. have to layoff, unless it's less than 5, which at that point, i would still struggle to make a play after that poor showing against VCU
0
hey buddy, are you looking at the Bradley/UNI game tomorrow? anything under 10 pt spread rule in effect?
me and bradley aren't mixing this year. have to layoff, unless it's less than 5, which at that point, i would still struggle to make a play after that poor showing against VCU
Hi Neil: Rare that you rank a game 5* , I believe Sacramento can cover, but they have lost 13 road games, lost by 30 against San Francisco, 12 vs Santa Clara, at home by 3 points vs Southern Utah. Northern Colorado has 3 wins at home...I read your excellent post like always, but I see a difficult game.
Good luck!!
0
Hi Neil: Rare that you rank a game 5* , I believe Sacramento can cover, but they have lost 13 road games, lost by 30 against San Francisco, 12 vs Santa Clara, at home by 3 points vs Southern Utah. Northern Colorado has 3 wins at home...I read your excellent post like always, but I see a difficult game.
Good luck!!
Nropp.. I love the sac state pick. I've been riding them all year. I've bet on them 9 times..and winner 9 times. Although they are usually getting 20+ points.. But I agree Northern Colo is not that much better.!
0
Nropp.. I love the sac state pick. I've been riding them all year. I've bet on them 9 times..and winner 9 times. Although they are usually getting 20+ points.. But I agree Northern Colo is not that much better.!
Saw your projections for Gonzaga/TN and Memphis/Zona ... I just think Gonzaga is better than people give them credit for. I really think they will be top 10 by the end of March. Also, on the Memphis-Zona game, will Zona play zone? They played us zone all game last year and did quite well. They have not played one play of zone at all this year. I think if they play the Tigers man, they are in for a long night. O'Neil will run NBA-iso sets all night because those guys are quite good when playing one-on-one. More talent on this team than Georgetown.
0
Saw your projections for Gonzaga/TN and Memphis/Zona ... I just think Gonzaga is better than people give them credit for. I really think they will be top 10 by the end of March. Also, on the Memphis-Zona game, will Zona play zone? They played us zone all game last year and did quite well. They have not played one play of zone at all this year. I think if they play the Tigers man, they are in for a long night. O'Neil will run NBA-iso sets all night because those guys are quite good when playing one-on-one. More talent on this team than Georgetown.
I've lost the last 2 times I rode with you bro. Tonight we buck that trend. I'm playing Sac St at +11 to win a dime tonight. Plays in. Let's get this! PAYBACK TIME!
Good Luck!||clover.gif' border=0>
0
I've lost the last 2 times I rode with you bro. Tonight we buck that trend. I'm playing Sac St at +11 to win a dime tonight. Plays in. Let's get this! PAYBACK TIME!
Good Luck!||clover.gif' border=0>
Neil wrote: ""Getting into some heavy conference action after the New Year, so time to go to work… "...
Oops! New Year? After Christmas? LOL! Sacramento was near, but now is 14 loses on a road. I hate disagree with Neil, more in a 5* bet, but I played the other side in a small play.
||an_drunksick.gif' border=0>
0
Neil wrote: ""Getting into some heavy conference action after the New Year, so time to go to work… "...
Oops! New Year? After Christmas? LOL! Sacramento was near, but now is 14 loses on a road. I hate disagree with Neil, more in a 5* bet, but I played the other side in a small play.
||an_drunksick.gif' border=0>
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.