Day Amount W/L Profit Net profit 1 $10 L -$10 -$10 2 $20 L -$20 -$30 3 $40 W +$36.40 +$6.40
Here we’ve lost 1st $10 bet, then the next day we made a $20 bet and lost again, but on 3rd day we made $40 bet and won. This gave us profit of $6.40 with winning only 1 out of 3 bets. Flat bettor would be -$20.90.
Day Amount W/L Profit Net profit 1 $10 L -$10 -$10 2 $20 L -$20 -$30 3 $40 W +$36.40 +$6.40
Here we’ve lost 1st $10 bet, then the next day we made a $20 bet and lost again, but on 3rd day we made $40 bet and won. This gave us profit of $6.40 with winning only 1 out of 3 bets. Flat bettor would be -$20.90.
Day Amount W/L Profit Net profit 1 $10 L -$10 -$10 2 $20 L -$20 -$30 3 $40 L -$40 -$70 4 $60 W +$54.60 -$15.40 5 $80 L -$80 -$95.40 6 $125 W +$113.75 +$18.35
Here we’ve lost first 3 bets and then made a winning bet on 4th day, but that still didn’t provide a profit for us, so we continue a series. At the end, winning 2 out of 6 bets gave us $18.35 profit. In the same time flat bettor would be -$41.80.
Day Amount W/L Profit Net profit 1 $10 L -$10 -$10 2 $20 L -$20 -$30 3 $40 L -$40 -$70 4 $60 W +$54.60 -$15.40 5 $80 L -$80 -$95.40 6 $125 W +$113.75 +$18.35
Here we’ve lost first 3 bets and then made a winning bet on 4th day, but that still didn’t provide a profit for us, so we continue a series. At the end, winning 2 out of 6 bets gave us $18.35 profit. In the same time flat bettor would be -$41.80.
Day Amount W/L Profit Net profit 1 $10 L -$10 -$10 2 $20 L -$20 -$30 3 $40 L -$40 -$70 4 $60 L -$60 -$130 5 $80 W +$72.80 -$57.20 6 $125 W +$113.75 +$56.55 Here we’ve lost first 4 bets and won 5th and 6th. Again, winning only 2 out 6 bets gave us profit of $56.55. In the same time flat bettor would be -$41.80.
Day Amount W/L Profit Net profit 1 $10 L -$10 -$10 2 $20 L -$20 -$30 3 $40 L -$40 -$70 4 $60 L -$60 -$130 5 $80 W +$72.80 -$57.20 6 $125 W +$113.75 +$56.55 Here we’ve lost first 4 bets and won 5th and 6th. Again, winning only 2 out 6 bets gave us profit of $56.55. In the same time flat bettor would be -$41.80.
I hope you can see now how profitable this system can be in the long run. You just need to follow a few simple rules: Place only 1 bet per day following the series X, 2X, 4X, 6X, 8X and 12.5X (X is your unit). At the moment you’ve made a profit stop the series, collect your money and start a new series next day. When you start to win after bet #3, follow the predetermined amounts in the series until you show a profit. You will only need to win 2 games within 6. If you didn’t make a profit in first 5 days stop the series and accept the loss! You’ve lost your 21 units because you were on the bad streak, that happens. Just recalculate your unit value and start a new series. In the above examples I’ve assumed only 33% winning rate, but with odds of -110 you can expect (on the long run) winning rate of around 50% which can yield even bigger profit.
I hope you can see now how profitable this system can be in the long run. You just need to follow a few simple rules: Place only 1 bet per day following the series X, 2X, 4X, 6X, 8X and 12.5X (X is your unit). At the moment you’ve made a profit stop the series, collect your money and start a new series next day. When you start to win after bet #3, follow the predetermined amounts in the series until you show a profit. You will only need to win 2 games within 6. If you didn’t make a profit in first 5 days stop the series and accept the loss! You’ve lost your 21 units because you were on the bad streak, that happens. Just recalculate your unit value and start a new series. In the above examples I’ve assumed only 33% winning rate, but with odds of -110 you can expect (on the long run) winning rate of around 50% which can yield even bigger profit.
Oh so there is an eat the loss clause-sorry I missed that. That question in my mind must have blinded my reading. I have been trying this-Bruins game over for 100, Win, then over for 100. Lose, then over for 200plus last juice, Can use different amount if 4-5 loses gets scary for u, but B's don't go many between overs although they can come with high juice. I would use B's team total, but it 's pricier and sometimes it's 3. On reverse, I use Buffalo Sabres for unders and I wish, wish wish I had been doing Celts unders this same way all season now.
Oh so there is an eat the loss clause-sorry I missed that. That question in my mind must have blinded my reading. I have been trying this-Bruins game over for 100, Win, then over for 100. Lose, then over for 200plus last juice, Can use different amount if 4-5 loses gets scary for u, but B's don't go many between overs although they can come with high juice. I would use B's team total, but it 's pricier and sometimes it's 3. On reverse, I use Buffalo Sabres for unders and I wish, wish wish I had been doing Celts unders this same way all season now.
congrats barb on the front page. i like in theory what u say, it is tremendous ,but alas real life kicks some of us in the ass. let bigpoo expound here a moment...for the regular joe wanting to start with 10$/or a higher plyr ,$100,you need 335 /or 3350 for the first series. thats great if you can get by on 10$ a day(yr win goal)100 a day u live better, but lets say i want to shoot for 500 u need 19k....a lot of bullshit artists got 19k here but very few of us in p.bx...and you will go 0-6. weve seen me go 0-7, barbs i did something similiar to this with dice, essentially i was laying 2700 to win 25, i lost that 2700 one time..in reality it is betting that 4 guys cant make 4 passes each....it happens.... this "method" you have is tremendous for the grinder and you have to go for 100 a game to make it worthwhile. meanwhile i love it...the best thing i ever read on this site. advanced martingale and fibonucci all have flaws mostly it is when u meet ther house limit...evn a lotta sports books go 2k a side..be careful kids,..this method is for the pros.
congrats barb on the front page. i like in theory what u say, it is tremendous ,but alas real life kicks some of us in the ass. let bigpoo expound here a moment...for the regular joe wanting to start with 10$/or a higher plyr ,$100,you need 335 /or 3350 for the first series. thats great if you can get by on 10$ a day(yr win goal)100 a day u live better, but lets say i want to shoot for 500 u need 19k....a lot of bullshit artists got 19k here but very few of us in p.bx...and you will go 0-6. weve seen me go 0-7, barbs i did something similiar to this with dice, essentially i was laying 2700 to win 25, i lost that 2700 one time..in reality it is betting that 4 guys cant make 4 passes each....it happens.... this "method" you have is tremendous for the grinder and you have to go for 100 a game to make it worthwhile. meanwhile i love it...the best thing i ever read on this site. advanced martingale and fibonucci all have flaws mostly it is when u meet ther house limit...evn a lotta sports books go 2k a side..be careful kids,..this method is for the pros.
barb, this sounds pretty cool. I will definitely be following this. would take some really hardcore money management, that I think only DJ has in this forum
barb, this sounds pretty cool. I will definitely be following this. would take some really hardcore money management, that I think only DJ has in this forum
Barbs I don't post often but follow your plays and have tremendous respect for you. I thought I should chime in with my thoughts about Martingale/Labby lines since I use Labby lines almost exclusively. You are correct that you only need to hit 33% to make money over the 6 bets but the way that you have it set up seems to be too much risk for a profit when you get to the higher bets. In your final example where you lost the first four the last two bets you now need to hit 100% of the time to make a profit instead of the 33% you were talking about before. I would suggest instead of this form if you want to use a system that you only need to hit 33% on you could give a labby system a try. Let's say you start with a bankroll of $10,000 like you mentioned above. I would suggest starting 5 or 6 lines of ten numbers of $20 (Bankroll management wise I try to keep all of my unit amounts between .1-.2% of my overall bankroll). Then you bet the number at the left hand side of the line added to the number at the right hand side.
For example: 20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20 You bet $40 for your first bet, if you win you cancel out two numbers if you lose you add it to the end.
If you lost your new line would be: 20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,40
If you won your new line would be: 20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20
This method would allow you to bet more than one game in a day and once you closed out a line you would be looking at $200 in profit. With 5-6 lines going at once you could see how you could make a decent amount of money but not put too much of your bankroll on any one play.
I'm sure you already know about the system I mentioned above but I thought I would give you my opinion since I've employed this method pretty successfully for a while. You still only need to hit 33% over the long run and you don't have the same do-or-die scenarios that you have in your original method. I hope this helps.
Barbs I don't post often but follow your plays and have tremendous respect for you. I thought I should chime in with my thoughts about Martingale/Labby lines since I use Labby lines almost exclusively. You are correct that you only need to hit 33% to make money over the 6 bets but the way that you have it set up seems to be too much risk for a profit when you get to the higher bets. In your final example where you lost the first four the last two bets you now need to hit 100% of the time to make a profit instead of the 33% you were talking about before. I would suggest instead of this form if you want to use a system that you only need to hit 33% on you could give a labby system a try. Let's say you start with a bankroll of $10,000 like you mentioned above. I would suggest starting 5 or 6 lines of ten numbers of $20 (Bankroll management wise I try to keep all of my unit amounts between .1-.2% of my overall bankroll). Then you bet the number at the left hand side of the line added to the number at the right hand side.
For example: 20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20 You bet $40 for your first bet, if you win you cancel out two numbers if you lose you add it to the end.
If you lost your new line would be: 20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,40
If you won your new line would be: 20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20
This method would allow you to bet more than one game in a day and once you closed out a line you would be looking at $200 in profit. With 5-6 lines going at once you could see how you could make a decent amount of money but not put too much of your bankroll on any one play.
I'm sure you already know about the system I mentioned above but I thought I would give you my opinion since I've employed this method pretty successfully for a while. You still only need to hit 33% over the long run and you don't have the same do-or-die scenarios that you have in your original method. I hope this helps.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.