Personally I would be grateful if I was visiting Mexico, Canada or any other country and became injured and was flown back to Houston at the expense of the country I was visiting.
Free medical care when I am injured and free trip home would be very much appreciated.
Do you agree with Medical Repatriation or should anyone injured in the US automatically have free medical care and rehabilitation until they feel they are totally recovered?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Personally I would be grateful if I was visiting Mexico, Canada or any other country and became injured and was flown back to Houston at the expense of the country I was visiting.
Free medical care when I am injured and free trip home would be very much appreciated.
Do you agree with Medical Repatriation or should anyone injured in the US automatically have free medical care and rehabilitation until they feel they are totally recovered?
I read that article on yahoo earlier today, the hospital actually done the right thing. In California the costs passed on to paying customers created by those that cannot pay are staggering along with causing people to wait for 8 hours or more for "emergency room" treatment.
I applaud the hospital for taking a stand.
0
I read that article on yahoo earlier today, the hospital actually done the right thing. In California the costs passed on to paying customers created by those that cannot pay are staggering along with causing people to wait for 8 hours or more for "emergency room" treatment.
IT was the right thing to do and it should be done all the time. We can't pay for these people. We can't afford to. I was reading the article yesterday on Yahoo and they quoted the Mexican guy as saying something like "obviously they hate Mexicans and just wanted me to die." Really?
0
IT was the right thing to do and it should be done all the time. We can't pay for these people. We can't afford to. I was reading the article yesterday on Yahoo and they quoted the Mexican guy as saying something like "obviously they hate Mexicans and just wanted me to die." Really?
does this conflict with the Reagan Health Care Mandate?
No...
The Reagan Health Care Mandate... In 1986, Congress passed the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act, which contained the Emergency Medical Treatment and
Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The law requires hospitals to treat patients
in need of emergency care regardless of their ability to pay,
citizenship, or even legal status. It applies to any hospital that takes
Medicare funds, which is virtually every hospital in the country.
Exert from Referenced Article: Hospitals are legally mandated to care for all patients who need
emergency treatment, regardless of citizenship status or ability to pay.
But once a patient is stabilized, that funding ceases, along with the
requirement to provide care. Many immigrant workers without citizenship
are ineligible for Medicaid, the government’s insurance program for the
poor and elderly.
The article is an excellent read.
No one is being denied emergency medical care.
No conflict.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
does this conflict with the Reagan Health Care Mandate?
No...
The Reagan Health Care Mandate... In 1986, Congress passed the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act, which contained the Emergency Medical Treatment and
Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The law requires hospitals to treat patients
in need of emergency care regardless of their ability to pay,
citizenship, or even legal status. It applies to any hospital that takes
Medicare funds, which is virtually every hospital in the country.
Exert from Referenced Article: Hospitals are legally mandated to care for all patients who need
emergency treatment, regardless of citizenship status or ability to pay.
But once a patient is stabilized, that funding ceases, along with the
requirement to provide care. Many immigrant workers without citizenship
are ineligible for Medicaid, the government’s insurance program for the
poor and elderly.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.