Don't you guys think post rankings or whatever they are should be based on how long you've been here not by post count?
So much wasted time going thru threads where idiots post emotions or pointless things just to run up the numbers
I agree, but then again if you've been here since 1999 and only post 2 times a year then what does that really prove?
I think rankings should be based on contribution to the forum rather than post count. ![]()
IMO, I think that the other members here should offer up some type of point + or - based on your integrity or information that you offer up.
I agree, but then again if you've been here since 1999 and only post 2 times a year then what does that really prove?
I think rankings should be based on contribution to the forum rather than post count. ![]()
IMO, I think that the other members here should offer up some type of point + or - based on your integrity or information that you offer up.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.