A federal jury Thursday found a 32-year-old Minnesota woman guilty of
illegally downloading music from the Internet and fined her $80,000
each -- a total of $1.9 million -- for 24 songs.
Jammie Thomas-Rasset's case was the first such copyright
infringement case to go to trial in the United States, her attorney
said.
Attorney Joe Sibley said that his client was shocked at
fine, noting that the price tag on the songs she downloaded was 99
cents.
She plans to appeal, he said.
Cara Duckworth, a spokeswoman for the Recording Industry Association of America, said the RIIA was "pleased that the jury agreed with the evidence and found the defendant liable."
"We appreciate the jury's service and that they take this as seriously as we do," she said.
Thomas-Rasset downloaded work by artists such as No Doubt, Linkin Park, Gloria Estefan and Sheryl Crow.
This was the second trial for Thomas-Rasset. The judge ordered a
retrial in 2007 after there was an error in the wording of jury
instructions.
The fines jumped considerably from the first trial, which granted just $22,000 to the recording companies.
Thomas-Rasset is married with four children and works for an Indian tribe in Minnesota.
A federal jury Thursday found a 32-year-old Minnesota woman guilty of
illegally downloading music from the Internet and fined her $80,000
each -- a total of $1.9 million -- for 24 songs.
Jammie Thomas-Rasset's case was the first such copyright
infringement case to go to trial in the United States, her attorney
said.
Attorney Joe Sibley said that his client was shocked at
fine, noting that the price tag on the songs she downloaded was 99
cents.
She plans to appeal, he said.
Cara Duckworth, a spokeswoman for the Recording Industry Association of America, said the RIIA was "pleased that the jury agreed with the evidence and found the defendant liable."
"We appreciate the jury's service and that they take this as seriously as we do," she said.
Thomas-Rasset downloaded work by artists such as No Doubt, Linkin Park, Gloria Estefan and Sheryl Crow.
This was the second trial for Thomas-Rasset. The judge ordered a
retrial in 2007 after there was an error in the wording of jury
instructions.
The fines jumped considerably from the first trial, which granted just $22,000 to the recording companies.
Thomas-Rasset is married with four children and works for an Indian tribe in Minnesota.
Fuck, I don't know her financial background, but I'm sure she wont be able to afford that so her credit will either be fucked and/or jail time. That fine is ridiculous, but I guess their just trying to set an example.
0
Fuck, I don't know her financial background, but I'm sure she wont be able to afford that so her credit will either be fucked and/or jail time. That fine is ridiculous, but I guess their just trying to set an example.
I'm pretty sure that she will appeal and a different jury will give her a lesser fine... That fine is just too ridiculous....
She can only appeal if there is something wrong with the court procedure but definitely cannot appeal just because of the high fines. Besides, I'm pretty sure the plaintiff is willing to settle on the side for whatever they think it's fair or whatever she can afford, as long as they got their message accross.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cyrax:
I'm pretty sure that she will appeal and a different jury will give her a lesser fine... That fine is just too ridiculous....
She can only appeal if there is something wrong with the court procedure but definitely cannot appeal just because of the high fines. Besides, I'm pretty sure the plaintiff is willing to settle on the side for whatever they think it's fair or whatever she can afford, as long as they got their message accross.
I've just read an article here in Denmark and it says that the fine in Denmark would be Dkr. 768,00. That's just about 137,00$.
The danish court system calculate your fine like this: Price of legal download (1,42$) * 2 copies of the song at the same price pr. copy * number of songs). Total 4,26$ pr. song.
- Then they investigate if there's songs among them that no longer is protected by copyright and as they don't cost anything they then deduct them from the fine.
Sorry for the gramma and spelling.
0
I've just read an article here in Denmark and it says that the fine in Denmark would be Dkr. 768,00. That's just about 137,00$.
The danish court system calculate your fine like this: Price of legal download (1,42$) * 2 copies of the song at the same price pr. copy * number of songs). Total 4,26$ pr. song.
- Then they investigate if there's songs among them that no longer is protected by copyright and as they don't cost anything they then deduct them from the fine.
I've just read an article here in Denmark and it says that the fine in Denmark would be Dkr. 768,00. That's just about 137,00$.
The danish court system calculate your fine like this: Price of legal download (1,42$) * 2 copies of the song at the same price pr. copy * number of songs). Total 4,26$ pr. song.
- Then they investigate if there's songs among them that no longer is protected by copyright and as they don't cost anything they then deduct them from the fine.
Sorry for the gramma and spelling.
..... I hit the submit button to soon.
I wanted to say that it seems more fair to be fined 3 times as much as it would cost to legally purchase the song, than being fined some insane amount.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The_Z:
I've just read an article here in Denmark and it says that the fine in Denmark would be Dkr. 768,00. That's just about 137,00$.
The danish court system calculate your fine like this: Price of legal download (1,42$) * 2 copies of the song at the same price pr. copy * number of songs). Total 4,26$ pr. song.
- Then they investigate if there's songs among them that no longer is protected by copyright and as they don't cost anything they then deduct them from the fine.
Sorry for the gramma and spelling.
..... I hit the submit button to soon.
I wanted to say that it seems more fair to be fined 3 times as much as it would cost to legally purchase the song, than being fined some insane amount.
Music company's are fucked and this wont help. If you use search engines for other countries(not everything is .com) you can find any song you want for about 9 cents.
0
Music company's are fucked and this wont help. If you use search engines for other countries(not everything is .com) you can find any song you want for about 9 cents.
She can only appeal if there is something wrong with the court procedure but definitely cannot appeal just because of the high fines. Besides, I'm pretty sure the plaintiff is willing to settle on the side for whatever they think it's fair or whatever she can afford, as long as they got their message accross.
Yeah I heard on the news lastnight that the Record Company are willing to settle for a Lesser amount of Money...
0
Quote Originally Posted by richardtonsj:
She can only appeal if there is something wrong with the court procedure but definitely cannot appeal just because of the high fines. Besides, I'm pretty sure the plaintiff is willing to settle on the side for whatever they think it's fair or whatever she can afford, as long as they got their message accross.
Yeah I heard on the news lastnight that the Record Company are willing to settle for a Lesser amount of Money...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.