These are the ones that stand out to me, of course it will be later in the week when I place them.
Tennessee -9 Va Tech - I am going to really look into this game... I do not want to play Tennessee, but this might be the best time to do it. We will see...
South Carolina +9.5 Miss St - State Miss st lost to USA
MTSU +5 Vandy - Cannot decide, might go the other way here.
Bama -24 Western Kentucky - Hurts alone will score 21 here, gonna look at the over here too.
Florida -16.5 Kentucky - I would like this a lot better at 14, but I am highly considering it. Florida has an amazing defense, and it looks like they finally got a QB. so I might play this.
Auburn -11 Arkansas st - I think Auburn wins by 14 or more here. They hung in there with D Watson, the heisman runner up, and went to a Natioal Championship. They can hang in there and do more against this team.
Troy +34 Clemson - I am not impressed with Clemson this season and I do not see them covering this.
La Monroe +44 Oklahoma - also not impressed with this team
These are the ones that stand out to me, of course it will be later in the week when I place them.
Tennessee -9 Va Tech - I am going to really look into this game... I do not want to play Tennessee, but this might be the best time to do it. We will see...
South Carolina +9.5 Miss St - State Miss st lost to USA
MTSU +5 Vandy - Cannot decide, might go the other way here.
Bama -24 Western Kentucky - Hurts alone will score 21 here, gonna look at the over here too.
Florida -16.5 Kentucky - I would like this a lot better at 14, but I am highly considering it. Florida has an amazing defense, and it looks like they finally got a QB. so I might play this.
Auburn -11 Arkansas st - I think Auburn wins by 14 or more here. They hung in there with D Watson, the heisman runner up, and went to a Natioal Championship. They can hang in there and do more against this team.
Troy +34 Clemson - I am not impressed with Clemson this season and I do not see them covering this.
La Monroe +44 Oklahoma - also not impressed with this team
FSU -6 Ole Miss - FSU returns 17 starters and Ole Miss lost some of it's major contributors when it comes to stopping the run. Ole Miss has an amazing offense, but I think the loaded FSU defense will do just enough to stop Kelly and get the win here. Controlling the game with Cook and the run game are huge here, and also FSU is pretty much at home.
Auburn -19 Arkansas st - Toledo, yes Toledo just put up 31 on them... Auburn obviously has a solid defense after what we saw against Clemson. Auburn offense should make some big plays too.
MTSU +6 Vandy - Vandy is still horrible and has no offense, defense is still decent, but MTSU put up some big numbers first week and have a damn good offense.
Va Tech +11 Tennessee - Tennessee did not impress me week one, and Va tech did. I can't make it any simpler than that.
FSU -6 Ole Miss - FSU returns 17 starters and Ole Miss lost some of it's major contributors when it comes to stopping the run. Ole Miss has an amazing offense, but I think the loaded FSU defense will do just enough to stop Kelly and get the win here. Controlling the game with Cook and the run game are huge here, and also FSU is pretty much at home.
Auburn -19 Arkansas st - Toledo, yes Toledo just put up 31 on them... Auburn obviously has a solid defense after what we saw against Clemson. Auburn offense should make some big plays too.
MTSU +6 Vandy - Vandy is still horrible and has no offense, defense is still decent, but MTSU put up some big numbers first week and have a damn good offense.
Va Tech +11 Tennessee - Tennessee did not impress me week one, and Va tech did. I can't make it any simpler than that.
VT only scored 36. VT had 4 turnovers (all fumbles ) to an FCS team... The safety they were spotted by Liberty was a stupid decision to even field the punt followed by an even dumber decision to run back into the endzone.
Don't get me wrong, Tennessee did not do anything that has me ready to jump on their side of this line either but to say VT impressed is a bit to bold considering they played an FCS opponent.
VT only scored 36. VT had 4 turnovers (all fumbles ) to an FCS team... The safety they were spotted by Liberty was a stupid decision to even field the punt followed by an even dumber decision to run back into the endzone.
Don't get me wrong, Tennessee did not do anything that has me ready to jump on their side of this line either but to say VT impressed is a bit to bold considering they played an FCS opponent.
VT only scored 36. VT had 4 turnovers (all fumbles ) to an FCS team... The safety they were spotted by Liberty was a stupid decision to even field the punt followed by an even dumber decision to run back into the endzone.
Don't get me wrong, Tennessee did not do anything that has me ready to jump on their side of this line either but to say VT impressed is a bit to bold considering they played an FCS opponent.
I do not go by who they played so much... Yeah, they made some mistakes, but those are correctable and I think they correct those this week. Regardless though, Tennessee was just bad.
VT only scored 36. VT had 4 turnovers (all fumbles ) to an FCS team... The safety they were spotted by Liberty was a stupid decision to even field the punt followed by an even dumber decision to run back into the endzone.
Don't get me wrong, Tennessee did not do anything that has me ready to jump on their side of this line either but to say VT impressed is a bit to bold considering they played an FCS opponent.
I do not go by who they played so much... Yeah, they made some mistakes, but those are correctable and I think they correct those this week. Regardless though, Tennessee was just bad.
Nice win w Bama tappy, I have to think they let Hurts get alot of snaps in this next game before OM, particularly w other options behind him.... this should be another romp.
I was leaning the other way w Tenn, VT was surprisingly not great but very few games over a 10 point loss last year in what was kindof a dud season for VT. Might lay off but giving 10+ to VT is some hefty chalk.
Nice win w Bama tappy, I have to think they let Hurts get alot of snaps in this next game before OM, particularly w other options behind him.... this should be another romp.
I was leaning the other way w Tenn, VT was surprisingly not great but very few games over a 10 point loss last year in what was kindof a dud season for VT. Might lay off but giving 10+ to VT is some hefty chalk.
If UF covers 17 the I don't see the under not hitting UK got 35 on all big plays and penalties, they couldn't keep a drive together. Just don't see them getting many points against Tabor & Co.
If UF covers 17 the I don't see the under not hitting UK got 35 on all big plays and penalties, they couldn't keep a drive together. Just don't see them getting many points against Tabor & Co.
Nice win w Bama tappy, I have to think they let Hurts get alot of snaps in this next game before OM, particularly w other options behind him.... this should be another romp.
Yup, I would imagine he would start from now on... I love Barnett, he is a great QB, but our team obviously responds to Hurts more so. This should get out of hand with him...
I was leaning the other way w Tenn, VT was surprisingly not great but very few games over a 10 point loss last year in what was kindof a dud season for VT. Might lay off but giving 10+ to VT is some hefty chalk.
Yeah I know, especially against a Tennessee team that simply does not have it together at this point.
Nice win w Bama tappy, I have to think they let Hurts get alot of snaps in this next game before OM, particularly w other options behind him.... this should be another romp.
Yup, I would imagine he would start from now on... I love Barnett, he is a great QB, but our team obviously responds to Hurts more so. This should get out of hand with him...
I was leaning the other way w Tenn, VT was surprisingly not great but very few games over a 10 point loss last year in what was kindof a dud season for VT. Might lay off but giving 10+ to VT is some hefty chalk.
Yeah I know, especially against a Tennessee team that simply does not have it together at this point.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.