All Forums | College Football

**Big Bowl Dogs** worth a look!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3498
Posts: 33
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #1

Army +225...Navy isnt that great this year...could go either way...i say (30/70)

Toledo +300...Utah st is really tough on D...but not too much on Offense (40/60)

KSU +270 ...Is Oregon on Letdwon after being so close for the last few years?? KSU will be thrilled to be in a BCS Bowl

Less of a dog worth a look OU +175, NC St +230, TX +110, EC +195

Teams in coaching transition...Wisc, Cinnci, NC St, NI (i think??) Ark st

Got any Dogs you like????

BOL This Bowl season!!!!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 696
Posted: #2
gotta think wisky gets all riled with with barry coaching the game i love the 6.5 pts in that game
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #3

Quote Originally Posted by traderjoe13:

gotta think wisky gets all riled with with barry coaching the game i love the 6.5 pts in that game

so they win?? ...or cover??I want winners!! I think Stanford wins by between 4 and 10!!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #4
Also i know Army navy isnt a Bowl game!! If the troops wanna call it a bowl ..i think they deserve it!! My Bro is in S Korea in the Army..and my dad was in Navy in Vietnam...N Korea scares the Sh it out of me!!!!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 66016
Posted: #5

Quote Originally Posted by traderjoe13:

gotta think wisky gets all riled with with barry coaching the game i love the 6.5 pts in that game

Have to agree. Barry put them in the  big time. I can't see anything put a supreme effort.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #6
WISCY 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 222
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Capper007:

Army +225...Navy isnt that great this year...could go either way...i say (30/70)

Toledo +300...Utah st is really tough on D...but not too much on Offense (40/60)

KSU +270 ...Is Oregon on Letdwon after being so close for the last few years?? KSU will be thrilled to be in a BCS Bowl

Less of a dog worth a look OU +175, NC St +230, TX +110, EC +195

Teams in coaching transition...Wisc, Cinnci, NC St, NI (i think??) Ark st

Got any Dogs you like????

BOL This Bowl season!!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 222
Posted: #8
TERRIBLE IDEA AND "BAD" PICKS NAVY WINS BY 30 AND THE DUCKS WILL PUT UP 65 POINTS ON JOKE K-STATE DEFENSE I DOUBT ANY OF THESE DOGS WIN UTAH ALWAYS COVERS..STOP SMOKING CRACK !
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 38174
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by tinfoils:

Have to agree. Barry put them in the  big time. I can't see anything put a supreme effort.

 That's one way to look at it.............the other is that none of these kids have played for alvarez so he didn't put them anywhere, & most of them were in elementary school when he last coached a game........ 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 38174
Posted: #10
 Capper..........I like Washington...........I think the spread is a bit high just because of BSU's rep & it may go higher. The Huskies are a Jekyl & Hyde team & are certainly capable of beating Boise..........not to mention this is the 4th straight LV bowl for Boise.......might be getting a bit bored with it.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 141
Posted: #11
Im taking stanford -6.5. That front 7 might be the best in football and will shut down ball and Co. Big10 is just awful this year. Im laying the points with stanford
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 12718
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by Capper007:

Army +225...Navy isnt that great this year...could go either way...i say (30/70)  and its a 30/70 not 50/50

Toledo +300...Utah st is really tough on D...but not too much on Offense (40/60)...and how about Toledo NON EXISTENT deffense

KSU +270 ...Is Oregon on Letdwon after being so close for the last few years?? KSU will be thrilled to be in a BCS Bowl---really and the kats should be thrilled after they shiet the bed against baylor and let the NCG slip right through their claws ¡¡¡ ..same spot for both teams...i just cant get out of the back of my ming that KSST start slow and what baylor did to them

Less of a dog worth a look OU +175, NC St +230, TX +110, EC +195--- i only have opinion about OU ----and the SEC version of T&AM will open up a new a- hole and steam roll the sooners

Teams in coaching transition...Wisc, Cinnci, NC St, NI (i think??) Ark st

Got any Dogs you like????

BOL This Bowl season!!!!




 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 66016
Posted: #13
Stanford could be looking for a new coach soon.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

 Capper..........I like Washington...........I think the spread is a bit high just because of BSU's rep & it may go higher. The Huskies are a Jekyl & Hyde team & are certainly capable of beating Boise..........not to mention this is the 4th straight LV bowl for Boise.......might be getting a bit bored with it.

thanks for your thoughts   definately worth a look!! PAC 12 vs BE (or whatever Boise is right now??)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by beatymandog:

TERRIBLE IDEA AND "BAD" PICKS NAVY WINS BY 30 AND THE DUCKS WILL PUT UP 65 POINTS ON JOKE K-STATE DEFENSE I DOUBT ANY OF THESE DOGS WIN UTAH ALWAYS COVERS..STOP SMOKING CRACK !

I like crack though!!! Of course you think the favorite will win!!! Your a talapia gnit idiot!!!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #16
Also i gave Army a 30% chance of winning and didnt give KSU a % but probably about a 25% chance!!! 3 to 1 odds would just need to hit one to break even!! BOL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #17

Quote Originally Posted by beatymandog:

TERRIBLE IDEA AND "BAD" PICKS NAVY WINS BY 30 AND THE DUCKS WILL PUT UP 65 POINTS ON JOKE K-STATE DEFENSE I DOUBT ANY OF THESE DOGS WIN UTAH ALWAYS COVERS..STOP SMOKING CRACK !

ALSO Its Utah St ...Not utah!!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 22119
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by beatymandog:

TERRIBLE IDEA AND "BAD" PICKS NAVY WINS BY 30 AND THE DUCKS WILL PUT UP 65 POINTS ON JOKE K-STATE DEFENSE I DOUBT ANY OF THESE DOGS WIN UTAH ALWAYS COVERS..STOP SMOKING CRACK !


Your the one who needs to put the pipe down.  Navy by 30...right.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #19
Di Jimmydafreak get "Boxed"????????????
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #20
did ..oops...for the thread he started??
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #21

My most noteable ML Dog winners this season:

Football - NCAA - Stanford vs. Oregon - Stanford 11/17/2012 8:00:01 PM- (EST)
+825

Football - NCAA - Texas A&M vs. Alabama - Texas A&M 11/10/2012 3:30:01 PM- (EST)
+420

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 274
Posted: #22
If you were going to see a letdown for Oregon it would have been in the Civil War which was the next week after the loss to Stanford except all you saw was Oregon absolutely destroy OSU and create 6 turnovers in the game. K Barner is EASILY the most underrated running back maybe in the history of college football. This guy is unbelievable. He ONLY ran the ball 248 times for 1625 yards that is 6.5 yards per rush. M Ball ran the ball 330 times at 5.1 ypr. Just imagine if Barner were able to play the 2nd half when he was pulled in 8 games after the first half. 300 rushing attempts would have given up 2,000 yards and since they include bowl games into your rushing stats this guy could easily have had the best rushing season in the history of college football. Oregon is too well coached to have any sort of letdown which they already proved.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 309
Posted: #23
Texas played k-state close for three quarters. K-State gave up lot of big plays and most of them were on the ground. Oregon has good rushing attack and if K-State falls behind they won't be able to stick to their running game.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #24

Quote Originally Posted by NevadaGamer:

If you were going to see a letdown for Oregon it would have been in the Civil War which was the next week after the loss to Stanford except all you saw was Oregon absolutely destroy OSU and create 6 turnovers in the game. K Barner is EASILY the most underrated running back maybe in the history of college football. This guy is unbelievable. He ONLY ran the ball 248 times for 1625 yards that is 6.5 yards per rush. M Ball ran the ball 330 times at 5.1 ypr. Just imagine if Barner were able t\o play the 2nd half when he was pulled in 8 games after the first half. 300 rushing attempts would have given up 2,000 yards and since they include bowl games into your rushing stats this guy could easily have had the best rushing season in the history of college football. Oregon is too well coached to have any sort of letdown which they already proved.

Agreed i think Oregon will win....But most of the players on the team expected to go to the N.C. game at some point this season (first time for KSU) Oregon has been at the doorstep for years now...was my point!!!They are Not in N.C. Game letdown....Not a Loss to Stanford Letdown!!!

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #25

Go Army!!!!

Football - NCAA - Navy vs. Army - Army 12/8/2012 3:00:01 PM- (EST)
+225

Also have :

Football - NCAA - Navy vs. Army - Army 12/8/2012 3:00:01 PM- (EST)
+7 -120

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.