qb- now thats what im talkin about.. i really like da picks buddy.. the best ive seen so far as im not to crazy fr others picks ive seen on here for week 1 but urs look like damn good winners.. i havnt locked anything in yet but do u think i should, r u concerned at all about sspensions or injuries cause that the main thing that scares the shit outta me man..
qb- now thats what im talkin about.. i really like da picks buddy.. the best ive seen so far as im not to crazy fr others picks ive seen on here for week 1 but urs look like damn good winners.. i havnt locked anything in yet but do u think i should, r u concerned at all about sspensions or injuries cause that the main thing that scares the shit outta me man..
that WVU line has been going up and down like a rollercoaster...my pick was based on some good research and thats what im rolling with + it was an obvi. pick...
that WVU line has been going up and down like a rollercoaster...my pick was based on some good research and thats what im rolling with + it was an obvi. pick...
they will be battling oregon for the rite to play for in the pac-12 title game this year...
ur not a pac-12 guy anyway...
for example : stanford has beatin usc without luck in the past...
... this team is a proven winner thats why im rollin with them...
really? what inclination gave you that? I love the P12 And follow it very closely. My favorite college football team plays in the P12.
Stanford is going to get exposed with a mediocre defense, garbage new QB and average Head coach. 7-5 at best
USC -38 Rice +16 Wash St +13.5 San Jose St +25.5 Cal -11 Washington -14 Colorado State +7 Toledo +11 Ark State vs Oregon OVER 65
GUARANTEE ANYONE MAKES MONEY WITH THOSE WAGERS INVOLVING ALL THE P12 SCHOOLS. (Arizona State, Oregon St, and Utah are playing D-1A Schools where the lines are not out yet.)
they will be battling oregon for the rite to play for in the pac-12 title game this year...
ur not a pac-12 guy anyway...
for example : stanford has beatin usc without luck in the past...
... this team is a proven winner thats why im rollin with them...
really? what inclination gave you that? I love the P12 And follow it very closely. My favorite college football team plays in the P12.
Stanford is going to get exposed with a mediocre defense, garbage new QB and average Head coach. 7-5 at best
USC -38 Rice +16 Wash St +13.5 San Jose St +25.5 Cal -11 Washington -14 Colorado State +7 Toledo +11 Ark State vs Oregon OVER 65
GUARANTEE ANYONE MAKES MONEY WITH THOSE WAGERS INVOLVING ALL THE P12 SCHOOLS. (Arizona State, Oregon St, and Utah are playing D-1A Schools where the lines are not out yet.)
really? what inclination gave you that? I love the P12 And follow it very closely. My favorite college football team plays in the P12.
Stanford is going to get exposed with a mediocre defense, garbage new QB and average Head coach. 7-5 at best
USC -38 Rice +16 Wash St +13.5 San Jose St +25.5 Cal -11 Washington -14 Colorado State +7 Toledo +11 Ark State vs Oregon OVER 65
GUARANTEE ANYONE MAKES MONEY WITH THOSE WAGERS INVOLVING ALL THE P12 SCHOOLS. (Arizona State, Oregon St, and Utah are playing D-1A Schools where the lines are not out yet.)
really? what inclination gave you that? I love the P12 And follow it very closely. My favorite college football team plays in the P12.
Stanford is going to get exposed with a mediocre defense, garbage new QB and average Head coach. 7-5 at best
USC -38 Rice +16 Wash St +13.5 San Jose St +25.5 Cal -11 Washington -14 Colorado State +7 Toledo +11 Ark State vs Oregon OVER 65
GUARANTEE ANYONE MAKES MONEY WITH THOSE WAGERS INVOLVING ALL THE P12 SCHOOLS. (Arizona State, Oregon St, and Utah are playing D-1A Schools where the lines are not out yet.)
ur pac-12 picks is .500 at best ....is thats the best u can do?
i am THEE Pac-12 guy...
really? .500 at best? what are your take on the games? sorry we disagree on the San Jose state games, but you are just acting like a fucking chump now.
i will bet you strait on the Stanford game. i would be happy to. how ever much you would like to go?
i thought you were better than this QBoption. i used to respect you but now you are being a fuckface because someone disagrees with ONE of your plays.
BTW, i would be shocked if those initial 9 plays dont go 6-3 or better.
ur pac-12 picks is .500 at best ....is thats the best u can do?
i am THEE Pac-12 guy...
really? .500 at best? what are your take on the games? sorry we disagree on the San Jose state games, but you are just acting like a fucking chump now.
i will bet you strait on the Stanford game. i would be happy to. how ever much you would like to go?
i thought you were better than this QBoption. i used to respect you but now you are being a fuckface because someone disagrees with ONE of your plays.
BTW, i would be shocked if those initial 9 plays dont go 6-3 or better.
ok, so here's the bet : when the stanford vs sjsu game is over, that following monday at 3pm est, the loser has start a new post in this forum with the title:" (winner name) is the best handicapper in the world," and in the thread the loser has to write " ( winner name) is the best all time and i suck compared to him."
ok, so here's the bet : when the stanford vs sjsu game is over, that following monday at 3pm est, the loser has start a new post in this forum with the title:" (winner name) is the best handicapper in the world," and in the thread the loser has to write " ( winner name) is the best all time and i suck compared to him."
ok, so here's the bet : when the stanford vs sjsu game is over, that following monday at 3pm est, the loser has start a new post in this forum with the title:" (winner name) is the best handicapper in the world," and in the thread the loser has to write " ( winner name) is the best all time and i suck compared to him."
um no....funny too because you claim to go 80% ATS during the 1st three weeks, and last year you were 10-7 ATS during weeks 1-2 but then never posted after that. is there a particular reason that you dont post after the 1st few weeks. a solid capper should be able to post winning plays any week they wager.
i will wager money on the game with you but your wager is plain old stupid.
San Jose Covers the spread in this game, if you want to bet that juice free, PM me and we can talk.
again, who do you like in the 9 P12 games. what can you post that will beat my picks.
why dont we do this. pick the following games. USC USC -38 UCLA Rice +16 WAZZU Wash St +13.5 Stanford San Jose St +25.5 California Cal -11 Washington Washington -14 Colorado Colorado State +7 Arizona Toledo +11 Oregon Ark State vs Oregon OVER 65
we can wager on whether or not your 9 selections will beat my 9. CASH ...Only spread and total wagers only, full game.
ok, so here's the bet : when the stanford vs sjsu game is over, that following monday at 3pm est, the loser has start a new post in this forum with the title:" (winner name) is the best handicapper in the world," and in the thread the loser has to write " ( winner name) is the best all time and i suck compared to him."
um no....funny too because you claim to go 80% ATS during the 1st three weeks, and last year you were 10-7 ATS during weeks 1-2 but then never posted after that. is there a particular reason that you dont post after the 1st few weeks. a solid capper should be able to post winning plays any week they wager.
i will wager money on the game with you but your wager is plain old stupid.
San Jose Covers the spread in this game, if you want to bet that juice free, PM me and we can talk.
again, who do you like in the 9 P12 games. what can you post that will beat my picks.
why dont we do this. pick the following games. USC USC -38 UCLA Rice +16 WAZZU Wash St +13.5 Stanford San Jose St +25.5 California Cal -11 Washington Washington -14 Colorado Colorado State +7 Arizona Toledo +11 Oregon Ark State vs Oregon OVER 65
we can wager on whether or not your 9 selections will beat my 9. CASH ...Only spread and total wagers only, full game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.