@ San Diego StLOSS No. Illinois TOSS UP @ Wake Forest LOSS Stony BrookWIN Boston College LOSS Kent State LOSS @E. MichiganTOSS UP Ball State TOSS UP Air Force TOSS UP @ Rutgers LOSS Temple TOSS UP Navy LOSS
I see 6 guaranteed Losses on the schedule, @ san diego state @ wake boston college kent state @ rutgers navy
Outside of stony brook (who has plenty of experience playing D-1A foes) i dont see a shoe in game for them to win.
i cannot see army (even though they return 15 starters) going 6-6, even though phil steele and others are higher on army than normal.
@ San Diego StLOSS No. Illinois TOSS UP @ Wake Forest LOSS Stony BrookWIN Boston College LOSS Kent State LOSS @E. MichiganTOSS UP Ball State TOSS UP Air Force TOSS UP @ Rutgers LOSS Temple TOSS UP Navy LOSS
I see 6 guaranteed Losses on the schedule, @ san diego state @ wake boston college kent state @ rutgers navy
Outside of stony brook (who has plenty of experience playing D-1A foes) i dont see a shoe in game for them to win.
i cannot see army (even though they return 15 starters) going 6-6, even though phil steele and others are higher on army than normal.
Army was 0-4 last year against the MAC, and this year
Ball state should be improved EMU should be improved Kent state has the best Defense in the MAC No. Illinois should be dominant running the football once again
i see at best 2-2... at best against the mac this year,
Army was 0-4 last year against the MAC, and this year
Ball state should be improved EMU should be improved Kent state has the best Defense in the MAC No. Illinois should be dominant running the football once again
i see at best 2-2... at best against the mac this year,
that's probably a good bet....however it doesn't make sense to call Kent St a guaranteed win and AF a toss up....AF is 10-14 pts better than Kent with line based ratings most years including last year...unlikely Army beats AF or Temple..neither has come closer than a TD over past 4+ yrs
that's probably a good bet....however it doesn't make sense to call Kent St a guaranteed win and AF a toss up....AF is 10-14 pts better than Kent with line based ratings most years including last year...unlikely Army beats AF or Temple..neither has come closer than a TD over past 4+ yrs
that's probably a good bet....however it doesn't make sense to call Kent St a guaranteed win and AF a toss up....AF is 10-14 pts better than Kent with line based ratings most years including last year...unlikely Army beats AF or Temple..neither has come closer than a TD over past 4+ yrs
would say yest to AF but they are severely down this year from everything i am hearing and i am rather high on Kent this year in the MAC
that's probably a good bet....however it doesn't make sense to call Kent St a guaranteed win and AF a toss up....AF is 10-14 pts better than Kent with line based ratings most years including last year...unlikely Army beats AF or Temple..neither has come closer than a TD over past 4+ yrs
would say yest to AF but they are severely down this year from everything i am hearing and i am rather high on Kent this year in the MAC
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.