| Author: |
[College Football] Topic: Mizzou vs Georgia line Sept 8th |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI   View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetOnline.ag | |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30026
Location: Missouri |
#1 Posted: 6/5/2012 8:00:01 PM Assuming both win openers and no injuries.....
Does Richt and crew warrant being favorites in this spot? I know they have a solid defense returning (although the corners are possibly suspended?) Murray lost some pieces around him so the offense wont be hitting on all cylinders early imo. Mizzou will struggle on both sides of the ball getting used to the speed and power and if Franklins passing hasnt improved the Tigers are in trouble.....
Pretty sure this will be a night game on national tv as its the biggest game of the weekend....gameday is a possibility. Thinking this is -3 either way......
Thoughts? Would love to hear the SEC homers opinions. I have no delusions about my school and if the suck I will be the first one to boo them.....
 and  and 
|
|
quote |
|
SatNightFever05 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3392
Location: California |
#2 Posted: 6/5/2012 8:09:44 PM 
way to much early love for the Bulldogs who will be in top 5 I'm sure to start the year..
|
|
quote |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30026
Location: Missouri |
#3 Posted: 6/5/2012 8:21:30 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:
I'll say UGA -4 though I'm not a SEC homer or really a SEC fan
way to much early love for the Bulldogs who will be in top 5 I'm sure to start the year..
-4 wouldnt surprise me (-8 or 9 wouldnt either). I just dont think UGAs 1st roadie in a strange place warrant chalk even though they have the better talent.
SNF |
|
quote |
|
jwheels86 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12489
Location: Alabama |
#4 Posted: 6/5/2012 9:42:55 PM |
|
quote |
|
Boom_Boom |
RSI  |
All-Star
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 14965
Location: South Carolina |
#5 Posted: 6/5/2012 9:56:03 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by jwheels86:
UGA is the same exact football team for over 6 years now. They have the easiest schedule I have ever seen in the SEC. Georgia has had the easiest schedule the last two years no doubt.... But at least these guys will go play out of conference games
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
jwheels86 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12489
Location: Alabama |
#6 Posted: 6/5/2012 10:12:35 PM |
|
quote |
|
jimmydafreak |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10838
Location: United States |
#7 Posted: 6/5/2012 11:02:38 PM Historically Missouri has been a SEC killers. As long as Mark Richt is on the sidelines fo Georgia, I like Missouri.
|
|
quote |
|
Corley1011 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Rookie
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 776
Location: Mississippi |
#8 Posted: 6/5/2012 11:42:22 PM |
|
quote |
|
jwheels86 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12489
Location: Alabama |
#9 Posted: 6/6/2012 12:11:39 AM |
|
quote |
|
Corley1011 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Rookie
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 776
Location: Mississippi |
#10 Posted: 6/6/2012 1:01:28 AM |
|
quote |
|
jwheels86 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12489
Location: Alabama |
#11 Posted: 6/6/2012 8:53:55 PM |
|
quote |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30026
Location: Missouri |
#12 Posted: 6/6/2012 9:02:36 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by jwheels86:
UGA isn't the team to display the physical style of SEC play to introduce Mizzou to the SEC. UGA is always prone to lose games like this outright.
True, UAG isnt Bama or LSU, but they are still a middle of the pack SEC squad, which is an upgrade from the middle of the pack Big 12 teams.....
|
|
quote |
|
jwheels86 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12489
Location: Alabama |
#13 Posted: 6/6/2012 10:23:12 PM |
|
quote |
|
jimmydafreak |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10838
Location: United States |
#14 Posted: 6/6/2012 10:46:55 PM Mizzou will be tough at home. I like the Tigers if I can catch some points.
|
|
quote |
|
DoubleUp4Life |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 30639
Location: New York |
#15 Posted: 6/7/2012 11:46:27 AM
Offense could be hard to prepare for .... Maybe lots of of Overs as well |
|
quote |
|
tideman |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3491
Location: United States |
#16 Posted: 6/7/2012 11:59:38 AM |
|
quote |
|
Atlanta |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1407
Location: Georgia |
#17 Posted: 6/7/2012 4:04:04 PM Georgia's linebackers and D line will be very strong. Secondary is questionable, due to suspensions, transfers, moving people in to cover the holes those situations created. If Mo's offensive line is strong, this could be exploited.
Offensively, UGA's line is once again an issue. They have not lived up to expectations the last two years, and this year expectations are a lot lower. Crowell looked very good in the spring, but he may decide to stand on the sidelines once real games start. Receiving corp should be better than average. Both punter and placekicker are gone, and I have to believe there will be a fall-off in both.
I don't know enough about Missouri to evaluate strengths vs weaknesses. |
|
quote |
|
The Hawk |
RSI  |
All-Star
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12124
Location: California |
#18 Posted: 6/7/2012 7:46:03 PM |
|
quote |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30026
Location: Missouri |
#19 Posted: 6/7/2012 11:18:44 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
Historically Missouri has been a SEC killers. As long as Mark Richt is on the sidelines fo Georgia, I like Missouri.
Pinkel isnt any better than Richt imo. He plays scared and rarelt wins a big game..... |
|
quote |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30026
Location: Missouri |
#20 Posted: 6/7/2012 11:19:19 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by tideman:
Welcome to the SEC This one is too tough... Georgia has the pieces, but one can only wonder if Richt can put them all together.. or does he have another underachieving team...
tideman |
|
quote |
|
Absolutxedge22 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11097
Location: Michigan |
#21 Posted: 6/8/2012 4:38:29 PM
|
|
quote |
|
jwheels86 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12489
Location: Alabama |
#22 Posted: 6/10/2012 5:02:55 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Absolutxedge22:
Georgia always seems to start the season slow and then get hotter as it progresses from winning standpoint. I'm not sure about ATS though.
Because they play no one during that stretch and especially this year. |
|
quote |
|
jwheels86 |
RSI |
All-Star
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12489
Location: Alabama |
#23 Posted: 6/10/2012 5:03:55 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by Atlanta: Georgia's linebackers and D line will be very strong. Secondary is questionable, due to suspensions, transfers, moving people in to cover the holes those situations created. If Mo's offensive line is strong, this could be exploited.
Offensively, UGA's line is once again an issue. They have not lived up to expectations the last two years, and this year expectations are a lot lower. Crowell looked very good in the spring, but he may decide to stand on the sidelines once real games start. Receiving corp should be better than average. Both punter and placekicker are gone, and I have to believe there will be a fall-off in both.
I don't know enough about Missouri to evaluate strengths vs weaknesses.
The way UGA plays defense is what kills them, their DC is not good enough. They either blitz entirely too much or sit back and get picked apart. They did it against MSU in the bowl game at the end and just slowly got beat. |
|
quote |
|
dugie243 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3357
Location: District of
Columbia |
#24 Posted: 6/11/2012 9:03:17 PM
GL to all 
|
|
quote |
|
nc1capper |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
All-Star
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14374
Location: North Carolina |
#25 Posted: 6/11/2012 10:23:11 PM |
|
quote |