AUBURN will girl slap the DUCKS

Disclaimer: A huge fan of both teams although AU is my favorite. Became a fan of the quack attack in the mid 90's when ESPN was showing a lot of their games in the 9-930pm time slot and as a result became a fan of the PAC10(a rarity in the deep south) because the high scoring games are a trip to watch.

The disparity at QB is glaring, the only team that shut down Newton was Mississippi State in our second game of the season. We had no idea of Cams capabilities and tried to use him in a standard offensive plan and barely squeaked the game out 17-14. Toss out this game and hes lights out and damn near unstoppable.

Auburn's size,speed and athleticism on both sides of the ball will  be unlike anything Oregon has seen this year and is impossible to duplicate in practice. Oregons hurry up offense will have minimal effect on the Auburn D as they go up against our own version of the hurry up in practice every day.

We will contain though not stop the OU outside running game with our speed and atheticism and force the OU QB to beat us through the air which he is not comfortable doing.

AUBURN 48 OU 28

really?  and you are an Auburn fan?

agree that Oregon doesn't have the same type of athletes....I was the one in these forums last bowl season listing reasons they couldn't beat Ohio St, but very few seemed to listen.  Oregon is a good team and fun to watch, as you note, but with 1 win over a ranked team, they should be at least a 6 or 7 pt dog here IMO...

GL

Quote Originally Posted by spinseeker:

If you were really an Oregon fan for 15+ years you would never call them OU.

Apologies mistook Oregon for Oklahoma which has a recent history of running through the regular season only to get blown out in their BCS bowl game. QUACK QUACK

Darron Thomas has over 2500 yards passing as well as a 28-7 td to int ratio. Auburn has a fine front 7, but they also sport one of the worst pass d's in the country.

Youre quoting passing statistics in the PAC 10 for gods sake!! Who cares about D in that conference?

Quote Originally Posted by thecourtjester:


Your pass defense will suffer when you are up 4 TDs by the 3rd quarter and the other team is playing catchup...

Six of Auburns 8 wins have come by 8 points or less. In two other wins by DD Auburn was either losing (Ark) or up by 4(UGA) in the 4th q. I would hardly say they have blown (other than USCe) good teams out of the water. 

Average?good? Auburns strength of schedule(sos) was 6th in the country I believe. Oregon was in the 50's, just face it Duck homer you are terrified of Auburn and know you will have to play a perfect game to have a chance.

I moved to Oregon just this past year, and I have stated before that I am a UNLV fan. Since I now live here I will pull for the Ducks in this game, but to call me homer is far from accurate.

 I had earlier responded to a statement you had made about Darron Thomas not wanting to "beat you through the air". After I had pointed out that DT is a good passing qb you pulled the whole "pac 10- doesn't play d" angle. Well, UO put up 52 on Stanford, who only gives up about 18 pts a game. Arizona also has an above average D, and the Ducks put up 48 on them.

the court jester then implied that AU's pass ranking was low b/c other teams were passing while playing catch up. That is NOT TRUE. Auburn has been in  lot of tight games this year. They have also had a few lucky breaks while Oregon has only had 1 I can think of.

And ur a SEC hater that probably losses 75% of ur games u bet against our conference..  Douchebag

Quote Originally Posted by Hank55:

AUBURN AND THEIR PAID DUMB ASS WILL GET WHAT THEY DESERVE.



OREGON 40
AUBURN 17

1. You post on a message board even when you are ignorant about the facts.

or

2.  You are a trash talking flamer that lies

or

3. You have some inside info that Auburn, SEC, NCAA and the FBI does not have.  I find this highly unlikely.

This was played two months ago.

Is this a prime example of a stellar SEC defensive game? Sure looks PAC10-ish.

 Your post had nothing to do with comparisons. You didn't add anything to the conversation or give any meaning or analysis other than to say something inflammatory. In your last post your break down my first question and actually attempt to take the two (sarcastic) examples out of context as stand alone questions was fail.  Surely your reading comprehension can't be that bad. 

Now if you had of expanded on your thought process and used it as an example of how the AU has been much better in 2nd halfs and how the defense has improved over the course of the season then that would have been helpful. 

The line has dropped. I suggest all oregon backers jump on this quickly as the smaller slower and weaker team will surely cover +3. Better yet invest your money in Enron.