Covers "Experts" are a JOKE

Question

Tonight, many top cappers were on both Illinois teams. On the matchups, the "experts" were on both teams at 12-2 and there was no hope for either team 5 minutes into each game.

I have noticed this quite frequently. I guess it just might be a better play to go against the so called Covers "experts"...what a joke...I mean it would save lots of time to just log on before each game and when the "experts" are piling onto a team, to just fade the "experts", than it would to waste time capping games when it seems the experts are more more often than right.

sundream · Answer

Tonight, many top cappers were on both Illinois teams. On the matchups, the "experts" were on both teams at 12-2 and there was no hope for either team 5 minutes into each game.

I have noticed this quite frequently. I guess it just might be a better play to go against the so called Covers "experts"...what a joke...I mean it would save lots of time to just log on before each game and when the "experts" are piling onto a team, to just fade the "experts", than it would to waste time capping games when it seems the experts are more more often than right.

HalfTimeOnly · Answer

Not to offend "Cover Experts", but I once checked --the last ten bets they played-- 90% of them get 5 win to 4 win...my reaction was like WOW !!

How can they possibly make money betting on their own (losing juice money), let alone making money for their customers???

SeattleC · Answer

The experts are wrong about half the time, so if you pick against them you'll be right about half the time. BTW, expert status means almost nothing. I'm the "expert" for six different teams, all of which I have basically no clue about.

Quantum_Leap · Answer

We&#x27;re all a joke. Even I am a joke. Anyone living on this planet is a joke. Most of all, trying to predict the future based on past results is probably a definition of insanity in some dictionary somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;If your point is that they all seem to gravitate to the same "safe" picks then you&#x27;re probably right. Most public faces do that...except Lou Holz--he&#x27;s bizaare sometimes, but not detestable.&#xD;&#xA;I think they look for consistency--and that makes them pick the same as the other guy with the good win%&#xD;&#xA;He&#x27;s all over S. Carolina ti win SU tomorrow. Not sure if that&#x27;s because he&#x27;s a former Gamecock coach, or he really sees a weakness in Auburn that SC can exploit.&#xD;&#xA;There are goofball experts out there. But they are inconsistent.

sundream · Answer

I am actually only talking about fading them when they are like 12-2 or 13-1 or something like that. It seems the last few weeks they are just awful. Not that I follow them really at all...just have no idea who you can call yourself an "expert" if you are no better at calling games than a coin itself being flipped.

Just checked out the top 50 cappers and I don't think ONE is at 60 percent or better...that is HORRIBLE.

kingofny2 · Answer

i will give you one PITT  CINCY under 27 first half .... i am the "expert" i am also an astronaut   my grandfather was friends with Buzz..

sundream · Answer

Good thing I didn&#x27;t take that PITT/CINCY 1st half under

Covers "Experts" are a JOKE

Hot Forum Topics