I think that this team is better than we think. They were embarassed last week at home and should come out this week strong and playing with a lot of fire.
0
I think that this team is better than we think. They were embarassed last week at home and should come out this week strong and playing with a lot of fire.
keep betting heavy favs each week cburk, that will get you nowhere fast. This is a proven winning system that usually hits 58-60 percent on a year. I am not just betting these games, but will play them like I have so far this year. It has been very profitable. BOL to you.
0
keep betting heavy favs each week cburk, that will get you nowhere fast. This is a proven winning system that usually hits 58-60 percent on a year. I am not just betting these games, but will play them like I have so far this year. It has been very profitable. BOL to you.
Baylor has had a rough season, mostly due to the lost of their quarterback. I watched the game last week vs. Nebraska. In the second half, Baylor being down 20 to Nebraska and having just lost 3 games in a row, should have been ready to pack it in. Instead, they came out with pride and determination and out played Nebraska. Their head coach, who came from Houston and was very successful, is not about to let these guys give up. My only question in taking Baylor would be their quarterback. I think he's the third stringer and he was a little sporadic with his play. I think this is his first road game. Otherwise, after watching Baylor in the second half last week, they may very well come out this week, against Missouri, and put up a real fight. I'd take the points with Baylor.
0
Baylor has had a rough season, mostly due to the lost of their quarterback. I watched the game last week vs. Nebraska. In the second half, Baylor being down 20 to Nebraska and having just lost 3 games in a row, should have been ready to pack it in. Instead, they came out with pride and determination and out played Nebraska. Their head coach, who came from Houston and was very successful, is not about to let these guys give up. My only question in taking Baylor would be their quarterback. I think he's the third stringer and he was a little sporadic with his play. I think this is his first road game. Otherwise, after watching Baylor in the second half last week, they may very well come out this week, against Missouri, and put up a real fight. I'd take the points with Baylor.
Baylor has had a rough season, mostly due to the lost of their quarterback. I watched the game last week vs. Nebraska. In the second half, Baylor being down 20 to Nebraska and having just lost 3 games in a row, should have been ready to pack it in. Instead, they came out with pride and determination and out played Nebraska. Their head coach, who came from Houston and was very successful, is not about to let these guys give up. My only question in taking Baylor would be their quarterback. I think he's the third stringer and he was a little sporadic with his play. I think this is his first road game. Otherwise, after watching Baylor in the second half last week, they may very well come out this week, against Missouri, and put up a real fight. I'd take the points with Baylor.
I agree, I don't think that he will have too tough of a time getting adjusted to the game against the Missouri defense who is absolutely atrocious. Mizzou is also very inconsistent and this could be a look ahead game. I think Baylor plays them very tough this week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by brandisland:
Baylor has had a rough season, mostly due to the lost of their quarterback. I watched the game last week vs. Nebraska. In the second half, Baylor being down 20 to Nebraska and having just lost 3 games in a row, should have been ready to pack it in. Instead, they came out with pride and determination and out played Nebraska. Their head coach, who came from Houston and was very successful, is not about to let these guys give up. My only question in taking Baylor would be their quarterback. I think he's the third stringer and he was a little sporadic with his play. I think this is his first road game. Otherwise, after watching Baylor in the second half last week, they may very well come out this week, against Missouri, and put up a real fight. I'd take the points with Baylor.
I agree, I don't think that he will have too tough of a time getting adjusted to the game against the Missouri defense who is absolutely atrocious. Mizzou is also very inconsistent and this could be a look ahead game. I think Baylor plays them very tough this week.
1. Reverse line movement is when a large majority of the betting population are on say the favorite at -7. While there are still 70 percent on them, the line drops to -6. That would in fact trigger to me that the underdog would be the play at +6. It is when the line moves when the majority is on them towards the dog. It has proven to be profitable if you play them correctly. Usually hits around 58-60 percent a year.
2. All of those teams above are who the RLM system says to take.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jp1lsu:
I'm a bit confused.
1) how do YOU define reverse line movement?
2) Which teams are you taking?
1. Reverse line movement is when a large majority of the betting population are on say the favorite at -7. While there are still 70 percent on them, the line drops to -6. That would in fact trigger to me that the underdog would be the play at +6. It is when the line moves when the majority is on them towards the dog. It has proven to be profitable if you play them correctly. Usually hits around 58-60 percent a year.
2. All of those teams above are who the RLM system says to take.
G...No offense but I am 15-5 for the last three weeks betting road favs. In the beginning of the year I worried about line movement and it messed with my handicapping so much that I would not play a strong lean of mine, Boise vs Fresno comes to mind, low and behold, Boise covers. I am not saying it doesn't win, sorry if you took it that way, but you can't just look at line movement, especially when crap teams like Baylor or UNLV are involved, you need to do some handicapping.
This week I am playing all favs, Houston was a fav. I like Oregon, Houston, UTEP, Sooners, OKla St, ND, BYU, and Houston, thoughts?
GL
0
G...No offense but I am 15-5 for the last three weeks betting road favs. In the beginning of the year I worried about line movement and it messed with my handicapping so much that I would not play a strong lean of mine, Boise vs Fresno comes to mind, low and behold, Boise covers. I am not saying it doesn't win, sorry if you took it that way, but you can't just look at line movement, especially when crap teams like Baylor or UNLV are involved, you need to do some handicapping.
This week I am playing all favs, Houston was a fav. I like Oregon, Houston, UTEP, Sooners, OKla St, ND, BYU, and Houston, thoughts?
Exactly, these 2 teams are bad, but whenever the public see a Colorado St. team against what looks to be a weaker opponent they pound them, not knowing that CSU is just as bad....
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Crap UNLV and Colorado St should be in DIV 3
Exactly, these 2 teams are bad, but whenever the public see a Colorado St. team against what looks to be a weaker opponent they pound them, not knowing that CSU is just as bad....
Exactly, these 2 teams are bad, but whenever the public see a Colorado St. team against what looks to be a weaker opponent they pound them, not knowing that CSU is just as bad....
No I am with you brother ...
Might add UNLV , but I have a horrible time trusting Sanford
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by grnlntrn4life:
Exactly, these 2 teams are bad, but whenever the public see a Colorado St. team against what looks to be a weaker opponent they pound them, not knowing that CSU is just as bad....
No I am with you brother ...
Might add UNLV , but I have a horrible time trusting Sanford
G...No offense but I am 15-5 for the last three weeks betting road favs. In the beginning of the year I worried about line movement and it messed with my handicapping so much that I would not play a strong lean of mine, Boise vs Fresno comes to mind, low and behold, Boise covers. I am not saying it doesn't win, sorry if you took it that way, but you can't just look at line movement, especially when crap teams like Baylor or UNLV are involved, you need to do some handicapping.
This week I am playing all favs, Houston was a fav. I like Oregon, Houston, UTEP, Sooners, OKla St, ND, BYU, and Houston, thoughts?
GL
I love some of those others that you have. I love Oregon this week, but haven't pulled the trigger yet. Probably will end up betting OU and ND as well. BOL this week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cburk:
G...No offense but I am 15-5 for the last three weeks betting road favs. In the beginning of the year I worried about line movement and it messed with my handicapping so much that I would not play a strong lean of mine, Boise vs Fresno comes to mind, low and behold, Boise covers. I am not saying it doesn't win, sorry if you took it that way, but you can't just look at line movement, especially when crap teams like Baylor or UNLV are involved, you need to do some handicapping.
This week I am playing all favs, Houston was a fav. I like Oregon, Houston, UTEP, Sooners, OKla St, ND, BYU, and Houston, thoughts?
GL
I love some of those others that you have. I love Oregon this week, but haven't pulled the trigger yet. Probably will end up betting OU and ND as well. BOL this week.
I agree, I don't think that he will have too tough of a time getting adjusted to the game against the Missouri defense who is absolutely atrocious. Mizzou is also very inconsistent and this could be a look ahead game. I think Baylor plays them very tough this week.
Wrong
They are giving up 22 ppg. The most they have given up is 41 to Texas. Gabbert has been injured since the 1st h of the Nebraska game. He is finally healthier and it showed 1st h vs Colorado. Baylor on the road is in trouble. Mizzou defense is very underrated if anything. The 41 vs Texas was mainly due to offensive lack of production......
0
Quote Originally Posted by grnlntrn4life:
I agree, I don't think that he will have too tough of a time getting adjusted to the game against the Missouri defense who is absolutely atrocious. Mizzou is also very inconsistent and this could be a look ahead game. I think Baylor plays them very tough this week.
Wrong
They are giving up 22 ppg. The most they have given up is 41 to Texas. Gabbert has been injured since the 1st h of the Nebraska game. He is finally healthier and it showed 1st h vs Colorado. Baylor on the road is in trouble. Mizzou defense is very underrated if anything. The 41 vs Texas was mainly due to offensive lack of production......
They are giving up 22 ppg. The most they have given up is 41 to Texas. Gabbert has been injured since the 1st h of the Nebraska game. He is finally healthier and it showed 1st h vs Colorado. Baylor on the road is in trouble. Mizzou defense is very underrated if anything. The 41 vs Texas was mainly due to offensive lack of production......
Not only texas, but oklahoma state as well. They gave up 33 points, most coming in the 2nd half too. Only threat on that defense is Witherspoon. This team is inconsistent, we will see though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Wrong
They are giving up 22 ppg. The most they have given up is 41 to Texas. Gabbert has been injured since the 1st h of the Nebraska game. He is finally healthier and it showed 1st h vs Colorado. Baylor on the road is in trouble. Mizzou defense is very underrated if anything. The 41 vs Texas was mainly due to offensive lack of production......
Not only texas, but oklahoma state as well. They gave up 33 points, most coming in the 2nd half too. Only threat on that defense is Witherspoon. This team is inconsistent, we will see though.
theres more to RLM than you think. Simply because it moves in favor of one side while the money is on the other side doesnt automatically make the play as public fade. 2 more factors are added such as betting trends. Betting trends show what side is getting betted on over a period of time. Lastly, linemakers know of people that bet on RLM and they have traps for us as well. Those two factors show why it hits 60% on your pick. When you learn to see it clearly it hits 100%. Remember Ohio State -38.5 last week jump to -44.5 and win by 45pts?
0
theres more to RLM than you think. Simply because it moves in favor of one side while the money is on the other side doesnt automatically make the play as public fade. 2 more factors are added such as betting trends. Betting trends show what side is getting betted on over a period of time. Lastly, linemakers know of people that bet on RLM and they have traps for us as well. Those two factors show why it hits 60% on your pick. When you learn to see it clearly it hits 100%. Remember Ohio State -38.5 last week jump to -44.5 and win by 45pts?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.